[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]yes, in terms of textures, resolution and AA. but when PC doesn't have a single exclusive developer to make a game optimized just for that $1000 gpu all that power means nothing. this is why PS3 has won most of graphics awards here on GS, the winner is picked by which system was able to output the most from hardware and PC is far from that spectrum today.I don't know on what hardware they were running the E3 demo. But fine, I'm with you, let's be on the safe side and say top of the line $1000 nVidia Titan.
The bottom line is; that high end PC footage of BF4 you saw, you do agree it looks better than this KZ footage, right?
ZoomZoom2490
Beautiful. That "yes" is what I was hoping to hear.
I hope now you do understand why it's not necessarily a sin for PC gamers to call it nothing special (at least in terms of graphics based on your answer) and be surprised by PS fans overreaction when there is already something better running on a last gen BF3 engine with high res (by your own admission).
If anything this footage warrants nothing but a disapointment reaction to what little power the hardware inside those next-gen consoles seems to be if the most graphically celebrated PS4 launch title is unable to match that of a last gen engine.
Will later titles in PS4 lifecycle match BF3 graphics or surpass it? Might be. But for the time being, this less-than last gen BF3 engine is nothing short of a disappointment let alone special.
Log in to comment