This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="789shadow"]
[QUOTE="playharderfool"]
:o wow, I've never heard such strong negative comments about a game from a mod before.
playharderfool
Being a mod does not mean forsaking opinions.
lol he said 256 players is a gimmick...most ambitious "gimmick" i've seen anyone attemp for online games this gen
I wont say any more except opinions can be telling.
If massive numbers of players didnt work on PC's why would it work on consoles? Its a poorly thought out gimmick, and just a marketing ploy. Playing BF2 with 64 players is already hectic, and 256 is gonna be a S*** show, with zero communciation going on.
Flop means it won't reach what it's hyped. It's hyped A-AA, it'll probably get A-AA.aaronmullanThere's AA hype for it? :?
I would eat my hat, and my current hat is woolen, and that would be unpleasurable to eat. so upon reflection, I would like this game to score lower than a 9.0scottiescott238
As a pose to the other range of tasty hats? :P
[QUOTE="aaronmullan"]Flop means it won't reach what it's hyped. It's hyped A-AA, it'll probably get A-AA.Stevo_the_gamerThere's AA hype for it? :? From the last poll, it was the second highest.
[QUOTE="789shadow"]
[QUOTE="playharderfool"]
:o wow, I've never heard such strong negative comments about a game from a mod before.
playharderfool
Being a mod does not mean forsaking opinions.
lol he said 256 players is a gimmick...most ambitious "gimmick" i've seen anyone attemp for online games this gen
I wont say any more except opinions can be telling.
it is a gimmick its not really 256 players for that matter, one single mode supports this its not a standard in the game, and even then its more like 8 on 8 players, at most 16 on 16 otherwise battles are in groups and chunks and rarely if ever does one team affect the battle of another across the map short of air strikes being used. I played the beta all most from inception and it never got any better the last part of the beta when they had quite a few updates out the game was still rampent with problems and balancing issues.He's right though.[QUOTE="CannedWorms"][QUOTE="playharderfool"]
:o wow, I've never heard such strong negative comments about a game from a mod before.
playharderfool
But do you think 256 players is a "gimmick" tho?
I'm pretty sure I've been modded for trolling saying alot less than that.
I think cross game chat for xbl is a gimmick but I don't put that opinion on blast because I know some other people think that's a novel feature. If people are allowed to spam the tag word "gimmick"on everything they choose not to find impressive then this place will be over run with unrealistic projections that don't acknoledge truly notable acheivements of games and consoles.
ah yes but i think the difference here is he is saying it because its shown to be, as well as me, and others in the thread, you on the other hand would say cross platform chat on xbl is a gimmick because your affiliated with a certain group, not because its actually a gimmick.MAG is a let down for me. I hope Zipper learn from this and should just stick to their bread and butter and that's Socom. If this gets AAA, I'm interested why GS gave it that score then I'll probably shake my head. Then I will read what the fanboys have to say and shake my head some more.
[QUOTE="playharderfool"]
[QUOTE="789shadow"]
Being a mod does not mean forsaking opinions.
Fizzman
lol he said 256 players is a gimmick...most ambitious "gimmick" i've seen anyone attemp for online games this gen
I wont say any more except opinions can be telling.
If massive numbers of players didnt work on PC's why would it work on consoles? Its a poorly thought out gimmick, and just a marketing ploy. Playing BF2 with 64 players is already hectic, and 256 is gonna be a S*** show, with zero communciation going on.
Ok but I expect you to say stuff like that lol.
[QUOTE="playharderfool"][QUOTE="CannedWorms"]He's right though.WilliamRLBaker
But do you think 256 players is a "gimmick" tho?
I'm pretty sure I've been modded for trolling saying alot less than that.
I think cross game chat for xbl is a gimmick but I don't put that opinion on blast because I know some other people think that's a novel feature. If people are allowed to spam the tag word "gimmick"on everything they choose not to find impressive then this place will be over run with unrealistic projections that don't acknoledge truly notable acheivements of games and consoles.
ah yes but i think the difference here is he is saying it because its shown to be, as well as me, and others in the thread, you on the other hand would say cross platform chat on xbl is a gimmick because your affiliated with a certain group, not because its actually a gimmick.I think it's a gimmick because...I think it's a gimmick. It dosn't have anything to do with the game you're playing. Dont try to twist my comments around with your self imposed rationalizations of what you "think" about me.
funny you say Cross game chat is not a gimmick, but it's not needed for the game you're playing and you have to pay extra for it.
Yet you say 256 players on line is a gimmick, but it's an intergal componet to the structure of the game itself and you don't have to pay extra for it.
Willi you can't talk to anybody on this fourm about being affiliated to a certian group, whatever my "affiliation" is it dosen't have any affect on how I post or what I say on these fourms.
it is a gimmick its not really 256 players for that matter, one single mode supports this its not a standard in the game, and even then its more like 8 on 8 players, at most 16 on 16 otherwise battles are in groups and chunks and rarely if ever does one team affect the battle of another across the map short of air strikes being used. I played the beta all most from inception and it never got any better the last part of the beta when they had quite a few updates out the game was still rampent with problems and balancing issues.WilliamRLBaker
:| How can you say that when the game hasn't even gone fully live yet? I mean if you haven't noticed the game hasn't been released...Oh wait, this is WilliamRLBarker I'm talking to...
[QUOTE="scottiescott238"]I would eat my hat, and my current hat is woolen, and that would be unpleasurable to eat. so upon reflection, I would like this game to score lower than a 9.0coolguy735
As a pose to the other range of tasty hats? :P
You see, I reckon I could eat a leather hat, its more chewy rather than the horror of gritting your teeth on wool :(All would be lost. The world itself would implode and everyone would be trapped in void of Hanna Montana theme songs and re-runs with albino versions of celebs talking about world peace. In short it wont happen and I regret ever sparking a slight interest in the game.
It Sure would be funny though.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment