If MAG scored AAA here on GS....

  • 74 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#51 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12363 Posts
seriously, MAG will be lucky to get anything over a 7.
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

49584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#53 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 49584 Posts
It would be Perfect Dark Zero all over again. Used for ownage, but everyone would know inside that it sucks. :P
Avatar image for oajlu
oajlu

2652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#54 oajlu
Member since 2006 • 2652 Posts

who knows, maybe it turns out to be a good game in final version.

Avatar image for thegamemonkey
thegamemonkey

3234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#55 thegamemonkey
Member since 2007 • 3234 Posts

I don't see it getting AAA; but Gamespot has been know to surpise us.

Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#56 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

[QUOTE="789shadow"]

[QUOTE="playharderfool"]

:o wow, I've never heard such strong negative comments about a game from a mod before.

playharderfool

Being a mod does not mean forsaking opinions.

lol he said 256 players is a gimmick...most ambitious "gimmick" i've seen anyone attemp for online games this gen

I wont say any more except opinions can be telling.

If massive numbers of players didnt work on PC's why would it work on consoles? Its a poorly thought out gimmick, and just a marketing ploy. Playing BF2 with 64 players is already hectic, and 256 is gonna be a S*** show, with zero communciation going on.

Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#57 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts
Flop means it won't reach what it's hyped. It's hyped A-AA, it'll probably get A-AA.
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

49584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#58 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 49584 Posts
Flop means it won't reach what it's hyped. It's hyped A-AA, it'll probably get A-AA.aaronmullan
There's AA hype for it? :?
Avatar image for Nedemis
Nedemis

10715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#59 Nedemis
Member since 2002 • 10715 Posts
won't happen....after playing the beta, I'm regretting the fact that I preordered it. Can you say "cancel" cause I know that I can? :)
Avatar image for coolguy735
coolguy735

489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#60 coolguy735
Member since 2008 • 489 Posts

I would eat my hat, and my current hat is woolen, and that would be unpleasurable to eat. so upon reflection, I would like this game to score lower than a 9.0scottiescott238

As a pose to the other range of tasty hats? :P

Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#61 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts
[QUOTE="aaronmullan"]Flop means it won't reach what it's hyped. It's hyped A-AA, it'll probably get A-AA.Stevo_the_gamer
There's AA hype for it? :?

From the last poll, it was the second highest.
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="789shadow"]

[QUOTE="playharderfool"]

:o wow, I've never heard such strong negative comments about a game from a mod before.

playharderfool

Being a mod does not mean forsaking opinions.

lol he said 256 players is a gimmick...most ambitious "gimmick" i've seen anyone attemp for online games this gen

I wont say any more except opinions can be telling.

it is a gimmick its not really 256 players for that matter, one single mode supports this its not a standard in the game, and even then its more like 8 on 8 players, at most 16 on 16 otherwise battles are in groups and chunks and rarely if ever does one team affect the battle of another across the map short of air strikes being used. I played the beta all most from inception and it never got any better the last part of the beta when they had quite a few updates out the game was still rampent with problems and balancing issues.
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="CannedWorms"][QUOTE="playharderfool"]

:o wow, I've never heard such strong negative comments about a game from a mod before.

playharderfool

He's right though.

But do you think 256 players is a "gimmick" tho?

I'm pretty sure I've been modded for trolling saying alot less than that.

I think cross game chat for xbl is a gimmick but I don't put that opinion on blast because I know some other people think that's a novel feature. If people are allowed to spam the tag word "gimmick"on everything they choose not to find impressive then this place will be over run with unrealistic projections that don't acknoledge truly notable acheivements of games and consoles.

ah yes but i think the difference here is he is saying it because its shown to be, as well as me, and others in the thread, you on the other hand would say cross platform chat on xbl is a gimmick because your affiliated with a certain group, not because its actually a gimmick.
Avatar image for gago-gago
gago-gago

12138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#64 gago-gago
Member since 2009 • 12138 Posts

MAG is a let down for me. I hope Zipper learn from this and should just stick to their bread and butter and that's Socom. If this gets AAA, I'm interested why GS gave it that score then I'll probably shake my head. Then I will read what the fanboys have to say and shake my head some more.

Avatar image for Shad0ki11
Shad0ki11

12576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Shad0ki11
Member since 2006 • 12576 Posts

Well, I think I'd just continue on with my daily life.siLVURcross

Same here

Avatar image for playharderfool
playharderfool

2085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 playharderfool
Member since 2009 • 2085 Posts

[QUOTE="playharderfool"]

[QUOTE="789shadow"]

Being a mod does not mean forsaking opinions.

Fizzman

lol he said 256 players is a gimmick...most ambitious "gimmick" i've seen anyone attemp for online games this gen

I wont say any more except opinions can be telling.

If massive numbers of players didnt work on PC's why would it work on consoles? Its a poorly thought out gimmick, and just a marketing ploy. Playing BF2 with 64 players is already hectic, and 256 is gonna be a S*** show, with zero communciation going on.

Ok but I expect you to say stuff like that lol.

Avatar image for playharderfool
playharderfool

2085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 playharderfool
Member since 2009 • 2085 Posts

[QUOTE="playharderfool"]

[QUOTE="CannedWorms"]He's right though.WilliamRLBaker

But do you think 256 players is a "gimmick" tho?

I'm pretty sure I've been modded for trolling saying alot less than that.

I think cross game chat for xbl is a gimmick but I don't put that opinion on blast because I know some other people think that's a novel feature. If people are allowed to spam the tag word "gimmick"on everything they choose not to find impressive then this place will be over run with unrealistic projections that don't acknoledge truly notable acheivements of games and consoles.

ah yes but i think the difference here is he is saying it because its shown to be, as well as me, and others in the thread, you on the other hand would say cross platform chat on xbl is a gimmick because your affiliated with a certain group, not because its actually a gimmick.

I think it's a gimmick because...I think it's a gimmick. It dosn't have anything to do with the game you're playing. Dont try to twist my comments around with your self imposed rationalizations of what you "think" about me.

funny you say Cross game chat is not a gimmick, but it's not needed for the game you're playing and you have to pay extra for it.

Yet you say 256 players on line is a gimmick, but it's an intergal componet to the structure of the game itself and you don't have to pay extra for it.

Willi you can't talk to anybody on this fourm about being affiliated to a certian group, whatever my "affiliation" is it dosen't have any affect on how I post or what I say on these fourms.

Avatar image for playharderfool
playharderfool

2085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 playharderfool
Member since 2009 • 2085 Posts

it is a gimmick its not really 256 players for that matter, one single mode supports this its not a standard in the game, and even then its more like 8 on 8 players, at most 16 on 16 otherwise battles are in groups and chunks and rarely if ever does one team affect the battle of another across the map short of air strikes being used. I played the beta all most from inception and it never got any better the last part of the beta when they had quite a few updates out the game was still rampent with problems and balancing issues.WilliamRLBaker

:| How can you say that when the game hasn't even gone fully live yet? I mean if you haven't noticed the game hasn't been released...Oh wait, this is WilliamRLBarker I'm talking to...

Avatar image for deactivated-61010a1ed19f4
deactivated-61010a1ed19f4

3235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#69 deactivated-61010a1ed19f4
Member since 2007 • 3235 Posts

[QUOTE="scottiescott238"]I would eat my hat, and my current hat is woolen, and that would be unpleasurable to eat. so upon reflection, I would like this game to score lower than a 9.0coolguy735

As a pose to the other range of tasty hats? :P

You see, I reckon I could eat a leather hat, its more chewy rather than the horror of gritting your teeth on wool :(
Avatar image for RadecSupreme
RadecSupreme

4824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#70 RadecSupreme
Member since 2009 • 4824 Posts

I dont think it will. Bad Company 2 is better.

Avatar image for ChiSoxBombers
ChiSoxBombers

3700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 ChiSoxBombers
Member since 2006 • 3700 Posts

If it scored AAA here, that GS loses all my respect

Avatar image for zero_snake99
zero_snake99

3478

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72 zero_snake99
Member since 2004 • 3478 Posts
I can guarantee you that the majority of SWs users have not played the beta... it's apparent. They go by what others say, and what others say is just fabricated half the time. It's a very well made game. I have more fun with it than BFBC2.
Avatar image for mccoyca112
mccoyca112

5434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#73 mccoyca112
Member since 2007 • 5434 Posts

All would be lost. The world itself would implode and everyone would be trapped in void of Hanna Montana theme songs and re-runs with albino versions of celebs talking about world peace. In short it wont happen and I regret ever sparking a slight interest in the game.

It Sure would be funny though.

Avatar image for Sully28
Sully28

5097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 Sully28
Member since 2003 • 5097 Posts

If MAG scores AAA i will personally buy two copies of the game, one for me, and one for my friend just because after playing the beta i have lost all faith in this game and have shared my opinion on how bad it will be openly.