This topic is locked from further discussion.
Its quite embarrassing that the top 9 selling Wii games are all first party, and are all sh*t like Wii Play, Wii Fit etc etc. WiiU will be an utter failure to everyone but the nostalgia riddled nintendo enthusiasts.
RR360DD
Isn't it also quite embarrasing that no 360 game will ever sell as much as Wii Fit?
[QUOTE="princemarth23"]
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
Its quite embarrassing that the top 9 selling Wii games are all first party, and are all sh*t like Wii Play, Wii Fit etc etc. WiiU will be an utter failure to everyone but the nostalgia riddled nintendo enthusiasts.
RR360DD
Mario Kart, Galaxy games, Brawl, New Super Mario Bros are all quality games.
But its all the same sh*t over and over. I have to give Nintendo credit here, they sell the same games reskinned over and over, and moronic sheep still lap it up.
Kudos nintendo, you have the stupidest audience.
(Plays Halo)
[QUOTE="princemarth23"]
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
Its quite embarrassing that the top 9 selling Wii games are all first party, and are all sh*t like Wii Play, Wii Fit etc etc. WiiU will be an utter failure to everyone but the nostalgia riddled nintendo enthusiasts.
RR360DD
Mario Kart, Galaxy games, Brawl, New Super Mario Bros are all quality games.
But its all the same sh*t over and over. I have to give Nintendo credit here, they sell the same games reskinned over and over, and moronic sheep still lap it up.
Kudos nintendo, you have the stupidest audience.
are you seriously complaining about the same game over and over again?[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
Its quite embarrassing that the top 9 selling Wii games are all first party, and are all sh*t like Wii Play, Wii Fit etc etc. WiiU will be an utter failure to everyone but the nostalgia riddled nintendo enthusiasts.
dream431ca
Isn't it also quite embarrasing that no 360 game will ever sell as much as Wii Fit?
I would still be more embarrassed if I was on nintendo since they had to go after casuals to get sales. Though it is a little embarrassing that sony/ms can't get them like nintendo can. But nintendo lacks hardcore so they all have weakness.Sry wasn't meant to spread cancer. All i'm sayin is, It HAZ No Gamezzz![QUOTE="silversix_"]Sheep is perfectly fine with their The Conduit as the best shooter, 10 games with Mario's face per year and Wii Fit/Wii Sport. Leave sheep alone! wiifan001
Sry wasn't meant to spread cancer. All i'm sayin is, It HAZ No Gamezzz![QUOTE="wiifan001"]
[QUOTE="silversix_"]Sheep is perfectly fine with their The Conduit as the best shooter, 10 games with Mario's face per year and Wii Fit/Wii Sport. Leave sheep alone! silversix_
Sry wasn't meant to spread cancer. All i'm sayin is, It HAZ No Gamezzz![QUOTE="wiifan001"]
[QUOTE="silversix_"]Sheep is perfectly fine with their The Conduit as the best shooter, 10 games with Mario's face per year and Wii Fit/Wii Sport. Leave sheep alone! silversix_
Talk to the hand
Sheep is perfectly fine with their The Conduit as the best shooter, 10 games with Mario's face per year and Wii Fit/Wii Sport. Leave sheep alone! silversix_Lolz have fun with your Facebook games :lol:
[QUOTE="silversix_"]Sheep is perfectly fine with their The Conduit as the best shooter, 10 games with Mario's face per year and Wii Fit/Wii Sport. Leave sheep alone! WreckEm711Lolz have fun with your Facebook games :lol: well it is possible that he can have FB games open in one tab and a Wii game open in another... at the click of a mouse, no waggle needed :p that is the magic of PC gaming.
[QUOTE="silversix_"]Sheep is perfectly fine with their The Conduit as the best shooter, 10 games with Mario's face per year and Wii Fit/Wii Sport. Leave sheep alone! WreckEm711Lolz have fun with your Facebook games :lol:For that you need a facebook account :lol:
Lolz have fun with your Facebook games :lol:For that you need a facebook account :lol: Ooh what a hipster you are :lol:[QUOTE="WreckEm711"][QUOTE="silversix_"]Sheep is perfectly fine with their The Conduit as the best shooter, 10 games with Mario's face per year and Wii Fit/Wii Sport. Leave sheep alone! silversix_
Sheep is perfectly fine with their The Conduit as the best shooter, 10 games with Mario's face per year and Wii Fit/Wii Sport. Leave sheep alone! silversix_
No, the COD games and Goldeneye are our best shooters, we got less then 10 games with Mario's face last year(Unless Mario made a cameo in Skyward Sword or Return to Dreamland I don't know about), and Nintendo does publish more new IPs then Wii Fit/Wii Sport.
I just love how the people who criticize Nintendo can't even get their facts right.
[QUOTE="silversix_"]Sheep is perfectly fine with their The Conduit as the best shooter, 10 games with Mario's face per year and Wii Fit/Wii Sport. Leave sheep alone! caryslan2
No, the COD games and Goldeneye are our best shooters.
Are saying that this is a good thing?[QUOTE="silversix_"]Sheep is perfectly fine with their The Conduit as the best shooter, 10 games with Mario's face per year and Wii Fit/Wii Sport. Leave sheep alone! caryslan2
No, the COD games and Goldeneye are our best shooters, we got less then 10 games with Mario's face last year(Unless Mario made a cameo in Skyward Sword or Return to Dreamland I don't know about), and Nintendo does publish more new IPs then Wii Fit/Wii Sport.
I just love how the people who criticize Nintendo can't even get their facts right.
Nintendo is a disgrace and you shouldn't even use COD as your "best shooters"
COD is terrible on the Wii.
The Wii doesn't even really have any COD title released this gen.
just PS2 iterations with new skins.
How does it feel knowing you're probably new to 2006.How does it feel for sheep knowing that PS2 games look better than Wii games..
ThisIsTwoFace
The Wii doesn't even really have any COD title released this gen.
just PS2 iterations with new skins.
rasengan2552
I laugh at you.
[QUOTE="ThisIsTwoFace"]How does it feel knowing you're probably new to 2006.How does it feel for sheep knowing that PS2 games look better than Wii games..
Arbiterisl33t69
How does it feel knowing that its 2012 and Im merely reviving a fact that Nintendogs continue to deny?
[QUOTE="rasengan2552"]
The Wii doesn't even really have any COD title released this gen.
just PS2 iterations with new skins.
LegatoSkyheart
I laugh at you.
"JUST PS2 ITERATIONS WITH NEW SKINS"
Clown.
[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]
[QUOTE="rasengan2552"]
The Wii doesn't even really have any COD title released this gen.
just PS2 iterations with new skins.
ThisIsTwoFace
I laugh at you.
"JUST PS2 ITERATIONS WITH NEW SKINS"
Clown.
Modern Warefare isn't on PS2.
[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]
[QUOTE="rasengan2552"]
The Wii doesn't even really have any COD title released this gen.
just PS2 iterations with new skins.
ThisIsTwoFace
I laugh at you.
"JUST PS2 ITERATIONS WITH NEW SKINS"
Clown.
you guys completely missed the point I was trying to make ...*facepalm*
am at a lost for words right now ...
[QUOTE="caryslan2"]
[QUOTE="silversix_"]Sheep is perfectly fine with their The Conduit as the best shooter, 10 games with Mario's face per year and Wii Fit/Wii Sport. Leave sheep alone! ThisIsTwoFace
No, the COD games and Goldeneye are our best shooters, we got less then 10 games with Mario's face last year(Unless Mario made a cameo in Skyward Sword or Return to Dreamland I don't know about), and Nintendo does publish more new IPs then Wii Fit/Wii Sport.
I just love how the people who criticize Nintendo can't even get their facts right.
Nintendo is a disgrace and you shouldn't even use COD as your "best shooters"
COD is terrible on the Wii.
Modern Warfare Reflex, Black Ops and Modern Warfare 3 are some of the best online games on the Wii. About the only real issue is the fact that Activision refuses to give us map packs and updated game modes.
Otherwise, they are excellent games. And I do enjoy the Wii versions due to the motion controls.
you guys completely missed the point I was trying to make ...
*facepalm*
am at a lost for words right now ...
rasengan2552
dude you would be right if the latest Call of Duty Game for the Wii would be World at War, which I think is just the PS2 version (don't know didn't play any version of the game).
but I'm pointing out fact that Call of Duty 4 Exists on the Wii and that game isn't on the PS2. So how can it be "a PS2 iteration with new skins" if there's no PS2 game to come off from?
Your Point is that the Wii just has PS2 graphics, but didn't some of you guys just get done saying the Wii doesn't have PS2 graphics? lol
How does it feel for sheep knowing that PS2 games look better than Wii games..
ThisIsTwoFace
Are you serious? Last generation, the Gamecube and Xbox blew the PS2 out of the water in terms of graphics. Now, the Wii's hardware is based on the Gamecube's hardware, which means the system is above the PS2 in terms of raw power. Many Wii games are at least Gamecube quality, and there are some that push or exceed Xbox quality graphics.
Maybe the PS2 ports or early games are PS2 quality, but there are Wii games that look better then PS2 games. This is not fanboyism speaking, its common sense. The Wii's hardware is more powerful then the PS2 since its based on Gamecube tech.
yes. ,Your Point is that the Wii just has PS2 graphicsLegatoSkyheart
not me.but didn't some of you guys just get done saying the Wii doesn't have PS2 graphics? lol
[QUOTE="rasengan2552"]
you guys completely missed the point I was trying to make ...
*facepalm*
am at a lost for words right now ...
LegatoSkyheart
dude you would be right if the latest Call of Duty Game for the Wii would be World at War, which I think is just the PS2 version (don't know didn't play any version of the game).
but I'm pointing out fact that Call of Duty 4 Exists on the Wii and that game isn't on the PS2. So how can it be "a PS2 iteration with new skins" if there's no PS2 game to come off from?
Your Point is that the Wii just has PS2 graphics, but didn't some of you guys just get done saying the Wii doesn't have PS2 graphics? lol
Atcually, World at War on the Wii is based on the HD versions, so even that does not count. Unless the PS2 suddenly got versions of Modern Warfare, Black Ops, and Modern Warfare 3, there is no way they can be "reskinned" PS2 versions.
As far as I'm aware, COD 3 is the only one that was on both the PS2 and Wii.
This was my point eariler. It seems like people are willing to throw out half-baked arguments that really make no sense in the long run. I'm not opposed to people attacking the Wii's online or third-party support, since those are valid issues with the system. But throwing out arguments like "a PS2 iteration with new skins" is pointless because it removes all validity of the statement due to a lack of research.
And it makes the person who makes the comments look desperate for an argument against Nintendo. Its an argument that they can't even back up with facts and it makes them look like biased fanboys.
yes.[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]
Your Point is that the Wii just has PS2 graphicsrasengan2552
See I understood your point, but I gave out proof that your statement meant nothing, seeing as MW1 isn't on the PS2.
[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]
[QUOTE="rasengan2552"]
you guys completely missed the point I was trying to make ...
*facepalm*
am at a lost for words right now ...
caryslan2
dude you would be right if the latest Call of Duty Game for the Wii would be World at War, which I think is just the PS2 version (don't know didn't play any version of the game).
but I'm pointing out fact that Call of Duty 4 Exists on the Wii and that game isn't on the PS2. So how can it be "a PS2 iteration with new skins" if there's no PS2 game to come off from?
Your Point is that the Wii just has PS2 graphics, but didn't some of you guys just get done saying the Wii doesn't have PS2 graphics? lol
Atcually, World at War on the Wii is based on the HD versions, so even that does not count. Unless the PS2 suddenly got versions of Modern Warfare, Black Ops, and Modern Warfare 3, there is no way they can be "reskinned" PS2 versions.
As far as I'm aware, COD 3 is the only one that was on both the PS2 and Wii.
This was my point eariler. It seems like people are willing to throw out half-baked arguments that really make no sense in the long run. I'm not opposed to people attacking the Wii's online or third-party support, since those are valid issues with the system. But throwing out arguments like "a PS2 iteration with new skins" is pointless because it removes all validity of the statement due to a lack of research.
And it makes the person who makes the comments look desperate for an argument against Nintendo. Its an argument that they can't even back up with facts and it makes them look like biased fanboys.
I know that we're past this ... but I just wanted to point out that by " reskinned PS2 iterations" I was implying that all Wii COD games released this gen are just re-skinned version of COD 2: Big Red One on PS2. :)[QUOTE="caryslan2"][QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]
dude you would be right if the latest Call of Duty Game for the Wii would be World at War, which I think is just the PS2 version (don't know didn't play any version of the game).
but I'm pointing out fact that Call of Duty 4 Exists on the Wii and that game isn't on the PS2. So how can it be "a PS2 iteration with new skins" if there's no PS2 game to come off from?
Your Point is that the Wii just has PS2 graphics, but didn't some of you guys just get done saying the Wii doesn't have PS2 graphics? lol
rasengan2552
Atcually, World at War on the Wii is based on the HD versions, so even that does not count. Unless the PS2 suddenly got versions of Modern Warfare, Black Ops, and Modern Warfare 3, there is no way they can be "reskinned" PS2 versions.
As far as I'm aware, COD 3 is the only one that was on both the PS2 and Wii.
This was my point eariler. It seems like people are willing to throw out half-baked arguments that really make no sense in the long run. I'm not opposed to people attacking the Wii's online or third-party support, since those are valid issues with the system. But throwing out arguments like "a PS2 iteration with new skins" is pointless because it removes all validity of the statement due to a lack of research.
And it makes the person who makes the comments look desperate for an argument against Nintendo. Its an argument that they can't even back up with facts and it makes them look like biased fanboys.
I know that we're past this ... but I just wanted to point out that by " reskinned PS2 iterations" I was implying that all Wii COD games released this gen are just re-skinned version of COD 2: Big Red One on PS2. :)I really don't want to start pages about this one topic, but I have to ask. How can games like Modern Warfare Reflex and Black Ops be reskinned versions of Big Red One if those games aren't even set during WWII and BRO does not have the same online system as those game?
As for the graphics, those three games are likely different from BRO as well.
So, what do you mean by that statement?
I know that we're past this ... but I just wanted to point out that by " reskinned PS2 iterations" I was implying that all Wii COD games released this gen are just re-skinned version of COD 2: Big Red One on PS2. :)rasengan2552
That's even more Hilarious!
I know that we're past this ... but I just wanted to point out that by " reskinned PS2 iterations" I was implying that all Wii COD games released this gen are just re-skinned version of COD 2: Big Red One on PS2. :)[QUOTE="rasengan2552"][QUOTE="caryslan2"]
Atcually, World at War on the Wii is based on the HD versions, so even that does not count. Unless the PS2 suddenly got versions of Modern Warfare, Black Ops, and Modern Warfare 3, there is no way they can be "reskinned" PS2 versions.
As far as I'm aware, COD 3 is the only one that was on both the PS2 and Wii.
This was my point eariler. It seems like people are willing to throw out half-baked arguments that really make no sense in the long run. I'm not opposed to people attacking the Wii's online or third-party support, since those are valid issues with the system. But throwing out arguments like "a PS2 iteration with new skins" is pointless because it removes all validity of the statement due to a lack of research.
And it makes the person who makes the comments look desperate for an argument against Nintendo. Its an argument that they can't even back up with facts and it makes them look like biased fanboys.
caryslan2
I really don't want to start pages about this one topic, but I have to ask. How can games like Modern Warfare Reflex and Black Ops be reskinned versions of Big Red One if those games aren't even set during WWII and BRO does not have the same online system as those game?
As for the graphics, those three games are likely different from BRO as well.
So, what do you mean by that statement?
you are still reading into that ? I am just mindlessly trying to say that the graphics are outdated, no literal statements.[QUOTE="ThisIsTwoFace"]
[QUOTE="caryslan2"]
No, the COD games and Goldeneye are our best shooters, we got less then 10 games with Mario's face last year(Unless Mario made a cameo in Skyward Sword or Return to Dreamland I don't know about), and Nintendo does publish more new IPs then Wii Fit/Wii Sport.
I just love how the people who criticize Nintendo can't even get their facts right.
caryslan2
Nintendo is a disgrace and you shouldn't even use COD as your "best shooters"
COD is terrible on the Wii.
Modern Warfare Reflex, Black Ops and Modern Warfare 3 are some of the best online games on the Wii. About the only real issue is the fact that Activision refuses to give us map packs and updated game modes.
Otherwise, they are excellent games. And I do enjoy the Wii versions due to the motion controls.
COD Black Ops..
IGN gives Wii version 7.5/10
Metacritic : 80/100
COD Modern Warfare (Wii)
Metacritic : 76/100 (Xbox/PS3 : 94/100 )
GameRankings : 78.50% (PS3 Version : 93.54%)
COD Modern Warfare 3 (Wii)
Metacritic : 70/100 (PS3/Xbox : 88/100)
GameRankings : 69.25% (PS3 : 88.14 % , Xbox 88.34 %)
If thats your definition of "excellent" then it just shows the typical Nintendogs view of games and it shows the difference in quality between PS3/Xbox and Wii.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment