Gamespot doesnt EVEN BOTHER to review half of the quality titles on the Wii

  • 89 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

Kind of difficult to compare consoles on this board when GS doesn't even bother to review half of the quality titles on Wii. Where are my reviews for Rune Factory Frontier, PES 09, Anno Dawn of Discovery ect., which are all quality titles receiving quality scores on other sites.

Even when we do get reviews they often come months after the fact like Cod WaW.

Ridiculous.

Avatar image for shutdown_202
shutdown_202

5649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 shutdown_202
Member since 2005 • 5649 Posts

Because gamespot are toobusy reviewing Indiana Jones and shovelware, thats all.

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

I guess it just perpetuates the idea that you can't compare the wii to the other consoles.............................................cause so many of the games don't get reviewed lol. Seriously though, who cares about gamespot when it comes to the wii? Just don't bother with them, makes your life easier. (well maybe not for SW purposes but that's beside the point)

Avatar image for TalesofRaGnArOk
TalesofRaGnArOk

3189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 TalesofRaGnArOk
Member since 2007 • 3189 Posts

Eh, those games arent exactly the greatest examples to use.

The Conduit - thats what I'm anticipating (fingers crossed for AA)

Also, Tatsunoko vs. Capcom will probably be another AA. That seems to be the trend lately with Wii scores

Avatar image for Bentham
Bentham

1154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Bentham
Member since 2008 • 1154 Posts
Gamspot still reviews games? This is certainly news to me.
Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

Gamspot still reviews games? This is certainly news to me. Bentham
Gamespot reviews pretty much everything that's not on the Wii.

Avatar image for voxware00
voxware00

5018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 voxware00
Member since 2004 • 5018 Posts

Eh, those games arent exactly the greatest examples to use.

The Conduit - thats what I'm anticipating (fingers crossed for AA)

Also, Tatsunoko vs. Capcom will probably be another AA. That seems to be the trend lately with Wii scores

TalesofRaGnArOk

the difference is, the conduit will get reviewed eventually

i'm still waiting for the Rune Factory review

have you guys been keeping up with Eurogamers Grand Slam Tennis review? it went from a 5 to an 8 , did GS forget to review the game with WMP also?

Avatar image for -PuLse
-PuLse

538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 -PuLse
Member since 2009 • 538 Posts

Anno and Dawn of Discovery are the same game.

Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

Anno and Dawn of Discovery are the same game.

-PuLse

Sorry the comma was a mistype.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#10 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
You think the Wii has it bad? Oh please, the PC has it ten times worse.
Avatar image for ImaPirate0202
ImaPirate0202

4473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 ImaPirate0202
Member since 2005 • 4473 Posts

I'm sure it's hard to sort through all the crap to find the gems that deserve to be reviewed.

Avatar image for hiphops_savior
hiphops_savior

8535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

#13 hiphops_savior
Member since 2007 • 8535 Posts
Maybe because Gamespot is awfully short on Editors to review enough games on time?
Avatar image for Hungry_Jello
Hungry_Jello

3024

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Hungry_Jello
Member since 2008 • 3024 Posts

Clickety Click made a list of all the games reviewed by each system and the Wii had the same amount as the others. This BS that the Wii doesnt get enough reviews is sheep dribble.

Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

Maybe because Gamespot is awfully short on Editors to review enough games on time?hiphops_savior
That's really not my problem. If Gamespot doesn't have the diginity to properly staff their site rather than demote themselves to a second tier review source as a result of it, the honus is on them to fix it.

Avatar image for hiphops_savior
hiphops_savior

8535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

#16 hiphops_savior
Member since 2007 • 8535 Posts

Clickety Click made a list of all the games reviewed by each system and the Wii had the same amount as the others. This BS that the Wii doesnt get enough reviews is sheep dribble.

Hungry_Jello
It could also mean that Gamespot is desperate for writers to fill the void that Greissman and Navarro left when they left GS. Gamespot needs full time writers badly, and the overdue games for reviews proves it.
Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

Clickety Click made a list of all the games reviewed by each system and the Wii had the same amount as the others. This BS that the Wii doesnt get enough reviews is sheep dribble.

Hungry_Jello

Meaningless post for the win?

The Wii has A LOT more game releases in general than the 360 or PS3.

The point is that gamespot is missing Wii reviews or coming signifcantly later than the other consoles.

Avatar image for SMR-Venom
SMR-Venom

6500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 SMR-Venom
Member since 2007 • 6500 Posts

Clickety Click made a list of all the games reviewed by each system and the Wii had the same amount as the others. This BS that the Wii doesnt get enough reviews is sheep dribble.

Hungry_Jello
That's definitely true. However, wouldn't it be better to review "actual" games rather than Indy Jones, Up and Professor Heinz Wolff's Gravity >_> I would rather read a review for PES 2009 or Rune Factory. But, it is understandable that GS are not in the situation to review all the games that seem interesting.
Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

[QUOTE="Hungry_Jello"]

Clickety Click made a list of all the games reviewed by each system and the Wii had the same amount as the others. This BS that the Wii doesnt get enough reviews is sheep dribble.

SMR-Venom

That's definitely true. However, wouldn't it be better to review "actual" games rather than Indy Jones, Up and Professor Heinz Wolff's Gravity >_> I would rather read a review for PES 2009 or Rune Factory. But, it is understandable that GS are not in the situation to review all the games that seem interesting.

As I stated it's not true. The Wii has alot more game releases than the other consoles in general, it should have many more reviews than them in 2009 as a result of it, but Gamespot misses the highest percentage of Wii reviews as well.

Avatar image for -CheeseEater-
-CheeseEater-

5258

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 -CheeseEater-
Member since 2007 • 5258 Posts
Maybe because Gamespot is awfully short on Editors to review enough games on time?hiphops_savior
Quite right!
Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

[QUOTE="hiphops_savior"]Maybe because Gamespot is awfully short on Editors to review enough games on time?-CheeseEater-
Quite right!

As I said,

That's really not my problem. If Gamespot doesn't have the diginity to properly staff their site rather than demote themselves to a second tier review source as a result of it, the honus is on them to fix it.

Avatar image for Hungry_Jello
Hungry_Jello

3024

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Hungry_Jello
Member since 2008 • 3024 Posts

[QUOTE="-CheeseEater-"][QUOTE="hiphops_savior"]Maybe because Gamespot is awfully short on Editors to review enough games on time?redfordo

Quite right!

As I said,

That's really not my problem. If Gamespot doesn't have the diginity to properly staff their site rather than demote themselves to a second tier review source as a result of it, the honus is on them to fix it.

Stop complaining. Its not going to get you anywhere. If you dont like the way things go around here then leave. Noones stopping you. There are other gaming forums that might share your blurred opinion.

Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

[QUOTE="redfordo"]

[QUOTE="-CheeseEater-"] Quite right!Hungry_Jello

As I said,

That's really not my problem. If Gamespot doesn't have the diginity to properly staff their site rather than demote themselves to a second tier review source as a result of it, the honus is on them to fix it.

Stop complaining. Its not going to get you anywhere. If you dont like the way things go around here then leave. Noones stopping you. There are other gaming forums that might share your blurred opinion.

Better yet, Stop telling me what to do. I have the right to complain if I want to and I'm going to whether you like it or not.

Avatar image for AppleBlade
AppleBlade

615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 AppleBlade
Member since 2008 • 615 Posts

I'm sure it's hard to sort through all the crap to find the gems that deserve to be reviewed.

ImaPirate0202
Not really. Just go to Metacritic and go down the list. Dawn of Discovery has an 83, Pro Evo Soccer 2009 has an 85, and Rune Factory: Frontier has an 80 average. Just to put things in perspective those games have higher Metacritic averages than Mirror's Edge, Assassin's Creed, and Prototype. Yet Gamespot has not reviewed any of them. I think it's pretty absurd for 3 games with review averages of 80 or higher which appear on the best-selling system do not get reviewed, especially consider that everyone loves to complain about the lack of quality titles on the Wii. If there really is such a lack, then it shouldn't be a problem reviewing the few quality games there are, right?
Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10310

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10310 Posts

Bah. The PC also doesn't get alot of exclusive and multiplat game reviews. I don't see other fellow hermits making threads and whining about this.

Avatar image for robobie
robobie

2172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#26 robobie
Member since 2007 • 2172 Posts

In all fairness, with the amount of games that do get released on the Wii, I don't find it hard to believe that GS doesn't have time to review them.

Avatar image for SMR-Venom
SMR-Venom

6500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#27 SMR-Venom
Member since 2007 • 6500 Posts

In all fairness, with the amount of games that do get released on the Wii, I don't find it hard to believe that GS doesn't have time to review them.

robobie
That is true, but they should have their priorities straight too. At least get the major titles out of the way before you review Indiana Jones >_>
Avatar image for Oscar-Wilde
Oscar-Wilde

1675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Oscar-Wilde
Member since 2007 • 1675 Posts

Bah. The PC also doesn't get alot of exclusive and multiplat game reviews. I don't see other fellow hermits making threads and whining about this.

glez13

We should though, the fact that is this happening is a major issue that should be corrected as fast as possible. being that some take these reviews as the final word to see if a game is worth of a purchase or not.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#29 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
There are a lot of games that don't get reviewed, but who cares? You'll probably complain regardless. In the end you're just going to resort to your own opinion and no one else's.
Avatar image for hy4k
hy4k

1790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 hy4k
Member since 2009 • 1790 Posts
i'd be patient i'm guessing reviews are coming
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

I find it ridiculous that the Wii is that diverse. One person thinks that some are quality titles. The other does not. They get everyone!

Avatar image for deactivated-5b2b34c3a42a1
deactivated-5b2b34c3a42a1

2436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 deactivated-5b2b34c3a42a1
Member since 2009 • 2436 Posts

Because you just called Harvest Moon a quality game.

[QUOTE="glez13"]

Bah. The PC also doesn't get alot of exclusive and multiplat game reviews. I don't see other fellow hermits making threads and whining about this.

Oscar-Wilde

We should though, the fact that is this happening is a major issue that should be corrected as fast as possible. being that some take these reviews as the final word to see if a game is worth of a purchase or not.

That's because PC gaming is a joke. I used to be a PC gamer but I just couldn't do it while the 360/PS3 were getting all the exclusives and the PC gets a decent port of a multiplat once in a while. Anyways just download a game to "sample" it. If you like it buy it, if you don't like it then don't buy it. Its the perfect demo.

Avatar image for Number_1_Gamer
Number_1_Gamer

1786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Number_1_Gamer
Member since 2007 • 1786 Posts
Wii is kiddy and doesn't matter, anyway.OreoMilkshake
So are you.
Avatar image for robobie
robobie

2172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#34 robobie
Member since 2007 • 2172 Posts

[QUOTE="robobie"]

In all fairness, with the amount of games that do get released on the Wii, I don't find it hard to believe that GS doesn't have time to review them.

SMR-Venom

That is true, but they should have their priorities straight too. At least get the major titles out of the way before you review Indiana Jones >_>

Agreed, they should pay attention to what the people on the forums are talking about and rate games that are getting good previews and multiplats. I don't think it's very fair to rate a game on one console and not rate it on the next.

Avatar image for rolo107
rolo107

5469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#35 rolo107
Member since 2007 • 5469 Posts

[QUOTE="SMR-Venom"][QUOTE="Hungry_Jello"]

Clickety Click made a list of all the games reviewed by each system and the Wii had the same amount as the others. This BS that the Wii doesnt get enough reviews is sheep dribble.

redfordo

That's definitely true. However, wouldn't it be better to review "actual" games rather than Indy Jones, Up and Professor Heinz Wolff's Gravity >_> I would rather read a review for PES 2009 or Rune Factory. But, it is understandable that GS are not in the situation to review all the games that seem interesting.

As I stated it's not true. The Wii has alot more game releases than the other consoles in general, it should have many more reviews than them in 2009 as a result of it, but Gamespot misses the highest percentage of Wii reviews as well.

Oh, so they should cater to you and become Wiispot. lol
Avatar image for Shielder7
Shielder7

5191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#36 Shielder7
Member since 2006 • 5191 Posts

As I stated it's not true. The Wii has alot more game releases than the other consoles in general, it should have many more reviews than them in 2009 as a result of it, but Gamespot misses the highest percentage of Wii reviews as well.

redfordo

Because shovelware doesn't need reviewed and crossed system games for the Xbox 360 and Ps3 really only need to be review once. Also 8 year olds & soccer moms i.e. "the casual gamer" don't usually read Game review sites, they get there game reviews from Susan ( the block watch captain) and her son Jimmy so why bother?

Jimmy says Mario's a fun game BTW

Avatar image for ImaPirate0202
ImaPirate0202

4473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#37 ImaPirate0202
Member since 2005 • 4473 Posts

[QUOTE="ImaPirate0202"]

I'm sure it's hard to sort through all the crap to find the gems that deserve to be reviewed.

AppleBlade

Not really. Just go to Metacritic and go down the list. Dawn of Discovery has an 83, Pro Evo Soccer 2009 has an 85, and Rune Factory: Frontier has an 80 average. Just to put things in perspective those games have higher Metacritic averages than Mirror's Edge, Assassin's Creed, and Prototype. Yet Gamespot has not reviewed any of them. I think it's pretty absurd for 3 games with review averages of 80 or higher which appear on the best-selling system do not get reviewed, especially consider that everyone loves to complain about the lack of quality titles on the Wii. If there really is such a lack, then it shouldn't be a problem reviewing the few quality games there are, right?

I understand what you're saying, but I don't think a reviewer should ever use other reviews to base his opinion. Seeing that a game got good reviews, then being let down could cause his opinion to be faltered. I'd rather they go into the game with a neutral mindset. I would figure the editors go by hype, rather than other reviews.

Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

[QUOTE="redfordo"]

As I stated it's not true. The Wii has alot more game releases than the other consoles in general, it should have many more reviews than them in 2009 as a result of it, but Gamespot misses the highest percentage of Wii reviews as well.

Shielder7

Because shovelware doesn't need reviewed and crossed system games for the Xbox 360 and Ps3 really only need to be review once. Also 8 year olds & soccer moms i.e. "the casual gamer" don't usually read Game review sites, they get there game reviews from Susan ( the block watch captain) and her son Jimmy so why bother?

Jimmy says Mario's a fun game BTW

Anno, Rune Factory and PES 09 are all AA rated titles and are absolutely not shovelware by any terms of the definition. These are the games I am complaining about in terms of Gamespots missed reviews.

Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

[QUOTE="redfordo"]

[QUOTE="SMR-Venom"] That's definitely true. However, wouldn't it be better to review "actual" games rather than Indy Jones, Up and Professor Heinz Wolff's Gravity >_> I would rather read a review for PES 2009 or Rune Factory. But, it is understandable that GS are not in the situation to review all the games that seem interesting.rolo107

As I stated it's not true. The Wii has alot more game releases than the other consoles in general, it should have many more reviews than them in 2009 as a result of it, but Gamespot misses the highest percentage of Wii reviews as well.

Oh, so they should cater to you and become Wiispot. lol

How about catering to all consoles equally and not demonstrating bias? Or is that the kind of journalism that comforts you?

Avatar image for ImaPirate0202
ImaPirate0202

4473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#40 ImaPirate0202
Member since 2005 • 4473 Posts

[QUOTE="rolo107"][QUOTE="redfordo"]As I stated it's not true. The Wii has alot more game releases than the other consoles in general, it should have many more reviews than them in 2009 as a result of it, but Gamespot misses the highest percentage of Wii reviews as well.

redfordo

Oh, so they should cater to you and become Wiispot. lol

How about catering to all consoles equally and not demonstrating bias? Or is that the kingd of journalism that comforts you?

It comforts me perfectly because if Gamespot doesn't review it, then I look on different sites. Problem solved.

Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

[QUOTE="redfordo"]

[QUOTE="rolo107"] Oh, so they should cater to you and become Wiispot. lolImaPirate0202

How about catering to all consoles equally and not demonstrating bias? Or is that the kingd of journalism that comforts you?

It comforts me perfectly because if Gamespot doesn't review it, then I look on different sites. Problem solved.

What does what you just said have to do with Gamespot treating the different consoles equally?

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#43 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
You think the Wii has it bad? Oh please, the PC has it ten times worse.Vandalvideo
Yep, it took them nearly a month to review WOTLK. :lol:
Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]You think the Wii has it bad? Oh please, the PC has it ten times worse.princeofshapeir
Yep, it took them nearly a month to review WOTLK. :lol:

At least it was reviewed. I cant say the same for many Wii titles.

Avatar image for ImaPirate0202
ImaPirate0202

4473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#45 ImaPirate0202
Member since 2005 • 4473 Posts

[QUOTE="ImaPirate0202"]

[QUOTE="redfordo"]How about catering to all consoles equally and not demonstrating bias? Or is that the kingd of journalism that comforts you?

redfordo

It comforts me perfectly because if Gamespot doesn't review it, then I look on different sites. Problem solved.

What does what you just said have to do with Gamespot treating the different consoles equally?

This: If you don't like it, GTFO.

Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

[QUOTE="redfordo"]

[QUOTE="ImaPirate0202"]

It comforts me perfectly because if Gamespot doesn't review it, then I look on different sites. Problem solved.

ImaPirate0202

What does what you just said have to do with Gamespot treating the different consoles equally?

This: If you don't like it, GTFO.

And who are you exactly to try and tell me what to do, and what possible reason would I listen? lol please.

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#47 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]You think the Wii has it bad? Oh please, the PC has it ten times worse.redfordo

Yep, it took them nearly a month to review WOTLK. :lol:

At least it was reviewed. I cant say the same for many Wii titles.

Yeah, but imagine if they held off reviewing a big game like New Super Mario Bros. Wii or Super Mario Galaxy 2 for a month. That's how it was with WOTLK. Their review in the end for WOTLK was terrible anyway - it scored lower than Burning Crusade, and it is universally agreed that WOTLK is the better expansion.
Avatar image for ImaPirate0202
ImaPirate0202

4473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#48 ImaPirate0202
Member since 2005 • 4473 Posts

[QUOTE="ImaPirate0202"]

[QUOTE="redfordo"]What does what you just said have to do with Gamespot treating the different consoles equally?

redfordo

This: If you don't like it, GTFO.

And who are you exactly to try and tell me what to do, and what possible reason would I listen? lol please.

I like to think I offered you an option.

Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

[QUOTE="redfordo"]

[QUOTE="ImaPirate0202"]

This: If you don't like it, GTFO.

ImaPirate0202

And who are you exactly to try and tell me what to do, and what possible reason would I listen? lol please.

I like to think I offered you an option.

Let me offer you one:

No.

Avatar image for Planeforger
Planeforger

19584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 Planeforger
Member since 2004 • 19584 Posts

That's because PC gaming is a joke. I used to be a PC gamer but I just couldn't do it while the 360/PS3 were getting all the exclusives and the PC gets a decent port of a multiplat once in a while. Anyways just download a game to "sample" it. If you like it buy it, if you don't like it then don't buy it. Its the perfect demo.

ColdP1zza

PCs still get the most quality exclusive titles (check the lists), and most 360 exclusives wind up on the PC sooner or later, so I don't really see your point.
And why don't you just download demos instead of illegally downloading the full games? That's what they're for.

Anyway, I agree with the TC - Gamespot is really lagging behind with their reviews, and basically only focus on getting their big-name 360/PS3 titles out 'on time'.