So, i went through both games and took pictures of each, same car, on the same or same(ish) track, and came to the conclusion that GT6 car models, Specifically the lighting, lights,paint, etc. once again, look better,(More photorealistic, Forza 5(once again) has better, MUCH, MUCH MUUCCHH better environments though,No competition, period. But still, this is pretty interesting considering the generation gap.
As always, to get the original HD resolution, Click on the picture.
here they are.
First car, KTM xbow
Volks wagen Bug.
Ferrari F40
Subaru BRZ
Continuing with that theme, Subaru Impreza.
PEUGEOT HDI FAP(lol)
Ferrari 208 GTO
Ferrari 458 italia
Mazda RX7 FD Spirit R.
RUF yellow Bird.
yes i replicated the tag, to mach GT6.
Lexus LFA
So, For me atleast,
Forza 5 pros,
Incredible environmental effects. fog, sun rays effect,
The textures.
Clouds, no pun intended.
Trees, Grass, Road textures.
Good damage, and particle effects. best on metallic.
Incredible orange peel paint effect.
High attention to details, dynamic reflections of dashboard/wheel etc.
Highly detailed environments on Every track.
Updated lighting looks great and takes on it's on look.
Metal surface materials look much more natural.
Chrome, looks hands down better on body panels.
much better LOD of model. nice and smooth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Cons:
Tail lights and head lights, Need alot of work.
The lighting while a massive step forward is still behind GT.( this is more of a what do you prefer situation) but a con for me.
Cars tend to look, plastic at times, not very natural.
outside of forza vista, Wheels stop looking polished, a bit more matte.(LFA photo)
The crowds, No seriously, lets try and ignore them. But they are still there, Just drive faster.
Horrible smoke effects, seriously discouraging. smoke has the ability to teleport from the ground far after you pass it. instead of from the car, and disperses quickly.
very few cons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GT6 Pros.
Highly photo realistic lighting engine.
Head lights and tail lights look like actual lights, glass, the chrome a reflections etc.
The bulbs reflect inside the chrome of the lights, so does the beam from the lights.
Better paint tones when out on the track.
crowds(while bad) react to what you do, if you crash they cover their little 2/3d faces and have full body movement.
The lighting engine brings out the cars more dynamically.
Surfaces on the models react more naturally to light.(plastic etc)
Great volumetric smoke effects. reflect shadows and lights. and lots of smoke that lingers for a long time.(great for drifting, burnouts etc)
Dynamic Headlights.
Rain effects (while honestly lacking imo) look ok,better then GT5 that's for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cons.
Horrible trees, 2D, only certain tracks have 3d trees( good wood, some city tracks)(hardware)
horrible grass, (hardware limitations)
horrible clouds on standard tracks( green valley, trial moutain etc.
Environments lacking (Race atmosphere) Which forza 5 nails.
Crowds, while 3d, look freakishly horrible, especially on eiger, they look better in london though. but not by much
Environments as a whole are severely lacking. (blame this on hardware)
horrible damage, seriously...just bad, bad damage, if you can even call it damage. GT5 while bad, was better.
crash at 200, and slight dents and scuffs that make the car look burnt...what?
standards cars, that were not upgraded to premium, just horrible as hell, the RUF yellow bird was 1 of the 200 to be updated to premium.
aka the supra RZ.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
And that's really all for me, what do you think SW?
Log in to comment