Battlefield 4 reveal due "in about 90 days"

  • 91 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for faizan_faizan
faizan_faizan

7869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 faizan_faizan
Member since 2009 • 7869 Posts

I just hope the SP Campaign isn't crappy full of QTEs, Also the Destruction was very scripted, And more players.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#52 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Every year?

BF3 came out in 2011.

Wasdie

Medal of Honor was last year's spunkgargleweewee release from EA. Next years will be BF4. And since they're benching MoH because EA is too lazy to give the series the time and money it needs to be good, Battlefield will probably be picking up the slack unless Repawn gets their act together. Then EA will milk that IP to death, too. Man, I remember when true Battlefield sequels were events. F*cking EA. Worst publisher ever.

MoH was done by Danger Close. EA works with more than one studio. Oh btw, you should check out the history of BF game launches. There has been a game or an expansion nearly every year since 2002.

Also, as I edited to my post after you responded I'll say it again...

.A team of 230-250 can pump out a full game in 1 year no problem, as long as the ground work and thinking has been done first. Typical big-buget game development time is about 2 years. One for pre-production with a small team and the leaders of the game, and then full production which involves 200+. This way that 200+ can move from project to project easily. You don't have to worry about laying off people inbetween games, you can just keep having people work on different games and pump out content for those. 

While they were doing pre-production for BF3, the DICE team was working on a Need for Speed project and Medal of Honor 2010's multiplayer.

They have a seperate team at DICE that does engine work. That team only works on the Frosbite 2.0 engine. Unlike for BF3, BF4 will have an advantage of a finished engine and a lot more mature of an engine. 

So settle down.

I know who did MoH. :P My problem is whether they can make a game. My problem is that I am so tired of shooters that I literally cannot play them anymore unless I force myself. They're just constantly being thrown in our faces. And constantly milking the Battlefield IP is just going to weaken the brand over time. Look at Call of Duty. It's not good for an IP in the long run. But hey, this is EA. So... yeah.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#53 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="PCgameruk"] We should be well above that. BF3 should of been 128 this gen at least.DarkLink77

256 players?

Oh, Lord. The more players = better game argument.

Yeah I don't get that either, just suiting the best amount of players is for the best, and it's why 64 players works for BF.

Avatar image for Grey_Eyed_Elf
Grey_Eyed_Elf

7970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Grey_Eyed_Elf
Member since 2011 • 7970 Posts

Milking at its finest.

The engine used in BF3 is brand new and very demanding, also BF is a multiplayer game... What substantial improvement could 4 have that couldn't be added to 3 through a map pack?

12

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
[QUOTE="campzor"][QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

I wonder which poorly-fitting rap/hip-hop/wubstep song they'll use for the TV commercial.

Wonder how bad the SP will be this time. Hopefully they do more co-op missions though. That's one thing I actually wanted DLC for in BF3.

JangoWuzHere
hopefully there is NO campaign, and they just allow you to play mp with bots, just like bf2 -.-

That would be awful.

why would it be awful? what good came from that sorry excuse of a 4-5 hour campaign? Nothing..it was awful... WIth offline mp... u can pretty much practice to ur hearts content..also bots > shi!tty qte infested linear battlefield campaign
Avatar image for Primordialous
Primordialous

1313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#56 Primordialous
Member since 2012 • 1313 Posts

I wonder which poorly-fitting rap/hip-hop/wubstep song they'll use for the TV commercial.

ChubbyGuy40

Avatar image for deactivated-61cc564148ef4
deactivated-61cc564148ef4

10909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 deactivated-61cc564148ef4
Member since 2007 • 10909 Posts

Battlefield games used to be such an event when they came out. When 2 came out everyone went crazy over it. Now each new installment is just like any other game coming out

Avatar image for RR360DD
RR360DD

14099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 RR360DD
Member since 2011 • 14099 Posts

Milking at its finest.

The engine used in BF3 is brand new and very demanding, also BF is a multiplayer game... What substantial improvement could 4 have that couldn't be added to 3 through a map pack?

12

Grey_Eyed_Elf
Huh? Its probably going to be a next gen game, i'm sure there'll be a ton of things in the game not possible on current hardware, never mind as DLC for Battlefield 3 LOL
Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

Milking at its finest.

The engine used in BF3 is brand new and very demanding, also BF is a multiplayer game... What substantial improvement could 4 have that couldn't be added to 3 through a map pack?

12

Grey_Eyed_Elf
BF 4 is most likely going to be for nextgen consoles. Consolites will finally have 64 players at ultra settings.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#60 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

I just hope the SP Campaign isn't crappy full of QTEs, Also the Destruction was very scripted, And more players.

faizan_faizan
How many more players does it need?=O
Avatar image for TheDidact
TheDidact

3986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61 TheDidact
Member since 2012 • 3986 Posts
Will it be out next calendar year (2014) or next fiscal year?
Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11698

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#62 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11698 Posts
Like I said in another thread, they are saying within 90 days because the new consoles will be announced within 90 days, they just don't know when exactly. :) People are saying milk milk because we got use to it being; Mainline BF game then Spinoffs then another Mainline BF game. Now they are going from a mainline BF game to another mainline game without spin-off. Also 64 players is enough.
Avatar image for fueled-system
fueled-system

6529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 fueled-system
Member since 2008 • 6529 Posts
BF3 was a disgrace on consoles, hopefully they learn from their mistakes and don't go 100% graphics at the expense of gameplay
Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
Now this Im excited for :D Im still playing the hell out of BF3
Avatar image for AAllxxjjnn
AAllxxjjnn

19992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 AAllxxjjnn
Member since 2008 • 19992 Posts
huh, well, good news for me, this time I won't have to be worried about disappointment, because I'm not excited at all. Fool me once, EA.
Avatar image for HaloPimp978
HaloPimp978

7329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#66 HaloPimp978
Member since 2005 • 7329 Posts

Guess that means next gen is right around the corner and that's right the time of GDC.

Avatar image for jamejame
jamejame

10634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 jamejame
Member since 2005 • 10634 Posts

Well Battlefield: Bad Company 2 and Battlefield 3 (to a slightly lesser extent) are, in my opinion, the greatest multiplayer shooters ever made, so I could not be more stoked for this. I know it's popular to hate good and popular things, but I quite frankly, dgaf. Battlefield is the epitome of competitive multiplayer in my eyes.

Avatar image for DarkGamer007
DarkGamer007

6033

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 DarkGamer007
Member since 2008 • 6033 Posts

unless its futuristic (like BF 2042) i don't care. Never thought i'd say this to a BF game but im pretty much tired as fk of modern theme. Cannot stand it anymore no matter how of a quality the game is.silversix_
Same. Titan mode with destructable environments would be fun as all hell.

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#69 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

If they can cut the SP campaign out entirely, and would drop the price $10 whilst giving them a lot less to stress about, that would be totally fine. Preferable even.

Avatar image for JasonDarksavior
JasonDarksavior

9323

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#70 JasonDarksavior
Member since 2008 • 9323 Posts

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

I wonder which poorly-fitting rap/hip-hop/wubstep song they'll use for the TV commercial.

Wonder how bad the SP will be this time. Hopefully they do more co-op missions though. That's one thing I actually wanted DLC for in BF3.

Master_ShakeXXX

lol, who freakin cares about the single player in these games? I'd rather they make them online only and focus entirely on the multiplayer. 

You know how people say "I wish they wouldn't include a half-baked multiplayer mode and put all of their efforts into making a great single player experience"? Well that can work both ways for certain games. Battlefield doesn't  need  singleplayer. Frankly I think it's a waste in this case.

Dude ... whats with your sig? lol
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#71 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

I wonder which poorly-fitting rap/hip-hop/wubstep song they'll use for the TV commercial.

Wonder how bad the SP will be this time. Hopefully they do more co-op missions though. That's one thing I actually wanted DLC for in BF3.

JasonDarksavior

lol, who freakin cares about the single player in these games? I'd rather they make them online only and focus entirely on the multiplayer. 

You know how people say "I wish they wouldn't include a half-baked multiplayer mode and put all of their efforts into making a great single player experience"? Well that can work both ways for certain games. Battlefield doesn't  need  singleplayer. Frankly I think it's a waste in this case.

Dude ... whats with your sig? lol

Creepy girl from Evil Dead Remake.

Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#72 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

BF3 was a disgrace on consoles, hopefully they learn from their mistakes and don't go 100% graphics at the expense of gameplayfueled-system

 

It was a disgrace everywhere.

Avatar image for faizan_faizan
faizan_faizan

7869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 faizan_faizan
Member since 2009 • 7869 Posts

[QUOTE="fueled-system"]BF3 was a disgrace on consoles, hopefully they learn from their mistakes and don't go 100% graphics at the expense of gameplayPug-Nasty

 

It was a disgrace everywhere.

How so?
Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts

This means EA will be able to announce the PS4 version since Sony is revealing the PS4 in a matter of weeks. 

Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#75 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

[QUOTE="Pug-Nasty"]

[QUOTE="fueled-system"]BF3 was a disgrace on consoles, hopefully they learn from their mistakes and don't go 100% graphics at the expense of gameplayfaizan_faizan

 

It was a disgrace everywhere.

How so?

 

Battlenet was upsetting, especiallly not being able to change game settings until actually playing.

The servers were a joke, with latency issues primarily due to not being able to set a ping limit on who could join.  Very few matches I played on PC didn't have players with 200+ ms pings.

The consoles had better search options, with regions within regions able to be set.  The PC was far more limited in that regard.

 

I also just feel the Frostbite engine is just not very good.  It just plays buggy, especially clipping and hit reg.

Avatar image for deactivated-5c79c3cfce222
deactivated-5c79c3cfce222

4715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#76 deactivated-5c79c3cfce222
Member since 2009 • 4715 Posts

[QUOTE="MercenaryMafia"]I would rather have Bad Company 3 now and save Battlefield 4 for next-gen consoles, but hey its EA after all.Wasdie

Rumors are that BF4 will be on both of the next gen consoles. 64 players at 60fps as well.

Air Superiority being officially confirmed in End Game makes the China leak look quite real.

In which case it at this point sounds like a spruced up BF3 with some more stuff taken from BF2.

 

Avatar image for GhettoBlastin92
GhettoBlastin92

1231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 GhettoBlastin92
Member since 2012 • 1231 Posts
I'd prefer BC3 to be honest.
Avatar image for MacBoomStick
MacBoomStick

1822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 MacBoomStick
Member since 2011 • 1822 Posts

After the disappointment that was BF3 I am not excited. As long as they continue to develop BF games for consoles they will continue to suffer.

Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 12183 Posts

Bring back Commander Mode. Second make squads better to organize. Third use a frontline mode that requires the whole team to push forward and capture points you need at least six people near them to caputure the flag. 

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#80 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="MercenaryMafia"]I would rather have Bad Company 3 now and save Battlefield 4 for next-gen consoles, but hey its EA after all.McStrongfast

Rumors are that BF4 will be on both of the next gen consoles. 64 players at 60fps as well.

Air Superiority being officially confirmed in End Game makes the China leak look quite real.

In which case it at this point sounds like a spruced up BF3 with some more stuff taken from BF2.

 

I just hope it has less problems than BF3 as well.

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#81 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
In other words, Battlefield 3-2 Waiting for Haggard and Sweetwater to come back. Which, considering the response to the BF3 campaign and the silence on Bad Company 3, isn't unlikely to happen in this game.
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26645 Posts

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]I don't understand the hate for the SP, it was so much more enjoyable than Black ops 2.megadeth1117

svvdm95.gif

Both the CoD and BF series had horrible campaigns. He's not far off the mark with his remark.
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26645 Posts
BF3 was a disgrace on consoles, hopefully they learn from their mistakes and don't go 100% graphics at the expense of gameplayfueled-system
100% graphics? The graphics were worse than low on the PC version of BF3. :lol:
Avatar image for jessejay420
jessejay420

4091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 jessejay420
Member since 2011 • 4091 Posts
how long has bf3 been out?
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26645 Posts

how long has bf3 been out?jessejay420

October 20th, 2011.

Avatar image for jessejay420
jessejay420

4091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 jessejay420
Member since 2011 • 4091 Posts
[QUOTE="fueled-system"]BF3 was a disgrace on consoles, hopefully they learn from their mistakes and don't go 100% graphics at the expense of gameplayDragonfireXZ95
100% graphics? The graphics were worse than low on the PC version of BF3. :lol:

Agreed. actually,who cares if i agree? theres no denying that the graphics are absolutely horrible lol.
Avatar image for pl4yer_f0und
pl4yer_f0und

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 pl4yer_f0und
Member since 2009 • 990 Posts

I hope they get rid of that ugly blue/gray filter they put over the visuals, I want some color in the game.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

46283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#88 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 46283 Posts

It'll have pretty graphics and physics. I'm interested to see those, but there's no chance I'll actually buy the game. I'm sick of modern day shooters.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#89 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30570 Posts

Bad Company 1 and 2 are two of my favourite shooters this gen! Unfortunatly 360 and PS3 couldn't handle Battlefield 3 the way it should be played (64 players, HD, good framerate, etc).

Now, the next gen consoles version of Battlefield 4 seem to be everything BF3 should have been. Can't f*** wait!

Avatar image for dramaybaz
dramaybaz

6020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 dramaybaz
Member since 2005 • 6020 Posts
I most likely won't buy, if they are going to turn it in a COD like game with rehashes and map packs.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#91 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64037 Posts
Drop the single player, and focus strictly on the MP kthx