Brady or Manning on your team?

[QUOTE="midnite_toker22"]

[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"]Did you just call Brady a system QB?Jaysonguy

Matt Cassel threw for 3693 yds, 21 TDs and 11 INTs while completing 63.4% of his passes in that system whenBrady went down.

Carried them to an 11-5 record as well.

Obviously Brady is much better than Cassel, but Belichick's system is a huge part of his success.

Cassel completed 55% of his passes, had 2924 yds and 16 TDs to 16 INTs last year with the Cheifs.

Boy, it's almost like going from a Superbowl contender to one of the 3 worst teams in the league makes your numbers go down

:|

Exactly, the Patriots are a Superbowl contender with or without Brady.

The Colts without Manning, not so much.

[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

[QUOTE="midnite_toker22"]

Matt Cassel threw for 3693 yds, 21 TDs and 11 INTs while completing 63.4% of his passes in that system whenBrady went down.

Carried them to an 11-5 record as well.

Obviously Brady is much better than Cassel, but Belichick's system is a huge part of his success.

Cassel completed 55% of his passes, had 2924 yds and 16 TDs to 16 INTs last year with the Cheifs.

midnite_toker22

Boy, it's almost like going from a Superbowl contender to one of the 3 worst teams in the league makes your numbers go down

:|

Exactly, the Patriots are a Superbowl contender with or without Brady.

The Colts without Manning, not so much.

[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

Boy, it's almost like going from a Superbowl contender to one of the 3 worst teams in the league makes your numbers go down

:|

Exactly, the Patriots are a Superbowl contender with or without Brady.

The Colts without Manning, not so much.

[QUOTE="Bobbles"][QUOTE="midnite_toker22"]

Exactly, the Patriots are a Superbowl contender with or without Brady.

The Colts without Manning, not so much.

MoonMarvel

[QUOTE="midnite_toker22"]

[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

Boy, it's almost like going from a Superbowl contender to one of the 3 worst teams in the league makes your numbers go down

:|

Bobbles

Exactly, the Patriots are a Superbowl contender with or without Brady.

The Colts without Manning, not so much.

[QUOTE="Bobbles"][QUOTE="midnite_toker22"]

Exactly, the Patriots are a Superbowl contender with or without Brady.

The Colts without Manning, not so much.

Chutebox

I dont think anyone expected Matt Cassell to lead the Patriots to the SB if they had gotten in.

Patriots are not a SB team without Brady.

Just like the Colts are not a SB team without Manning.

I hate everything from Boston, but it would be foolish to say that any bum can lead the Patriots to the SB.

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="Bobbles"] Uh, no. Without Brady they are not a SB contender. Did they make the playoffs in Brady's absence? I forgot....Fizzman

I dont think anyone expected Matt Cassell to lead the Patriots to the SB if they had gotten in.

Patriots are not a SB team without Brady.

Just like the Colts are not a SB team without Manning.

I hate everything from Boston, but it would be foolish to say that any bum can lead the Patriots to the SB.

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"] Ok, but that was odd. They went 11-5...they should have been in the playoffs.Chutebox

I dont think anyone expected Matt Cassell to lead the Patriots to the SB if they had gotten in.

Patriots are not a SB team without Brady.

Just like the Colts are not a SB team without Manning.

I hate everything from Boston, but it would be foolish to say that any bum can lead the Patriots to the SB.

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="Fizzman"]

I dont think anyone expected Matt Cassell to lead the Patriots to the SB if they had gotten in.

Patriots are not a SB team without Brady.

Just like the Colts are not a SB team without Manning.

I hate everything from Boston, but it would be foolish to say that any bum can lead the Patriots to the SB.

Bobbles

Mannings, he's just better imo.

Chutebox

Tough call. They both have great careers, and not to mention they were equally as funny on SNL.

I'll go with Manning even though he beat my Bears in one of the most boring Super Bowls to date.