@JimB: You tell others to get out of an echo chamber but in the same post link to American Spectator? Hahahaha
Is there one single "right wing" news outlet you would consider trust worthy?
absolutely positively not.
20 years ago I might have said 'perhaps' but now? not a snowball chance in hell
and yes I know you were not asking me, I am just interjecting
Yet you use MSNBC and CNN as reliable news sources.
of course.
they are not really liberal enough for me but they do at least get facts right despite not diving as deep as I would like
They don't get the facts right and are selective in their reporting. If something happens that goes against the narrative they just don't report the story. I wish news outlets would report all the information good or bad on all the politicians and issues so sound judgment could be made. If you are Conservative you get all bad stories if you are Liberal all good stories. You can't find any stories about the Obama scandals while he ws president in the main stream media. They went out of their way to protect him. I did not want to persecute Obama just be truthful, call it the same both ways. I ask to much because that will never happen.
20 years ago I might have said 'perhaps' but now? not a snowball chance in hell
and yes I know you were not asking me, I am just interjecting
Yet you use MSNBC and CNN as reliable news sources.
of course.
they are not really liberal enough for me but they do at least get facts right despite not diving as deep as I would like
They don't get the facts right and are selective in their reporting. If something happens that goes against the narrative they just don't report the story. I wish news outlets would report all the information good or bad on all the politicians and issues so sound judgment could be made. If you are Conservative you get all bad stories if you are Liberal all good stories. You can't find any stories about the Obama scandals while he ws president in the main stream media. They went out of their way to protect him. I did not want to persecute Obama just be truthful, call it the same both ways. I ask to much because that will never happen.
if you say so.
only thing I can agree with is that they are narrative driven but they are not liberal enough.
I perfer Democracy Now, far more professional but still MSNBC despite there slightly conservative bias on some shows is still miles better than any conservative programming which is out right unbelievably absurd in almost all cases
20 years ago I might have said 'perhaps' but now? not a snowball chance in hell
and yes I know you were not asking me, I am just interjecting
Yet you use MSNBC and CNN as reliable news sources.
of course.
they are not really liberal enough for me but they do at least get facts right despite not diving as deep as I would like
They don't get the facts right and are selective in their reporting. If something happens that goes against the narrative they just don't report the story. I wish news outlets would report all the information good or bad on all the politicians and issues so sound judgment could be made. If you are Conservative you get all bad stories if you are Liberal all good stories. You can't find any stories about the Obama scandals while he ws president in the main stream media. They went out of their way to protect him. I did not want to persecute Obama just be truthful, call it the same both ways. I ask to much because that will never happen.
if you say so.
only thing I can agree with is that they are narrative driven but they are not liberal enough.
I perfer Democracy Now, far more professional but still MSNBC despite there slightly conservative bias on some shows is still miles better than any conservative programming which is out right unbelievably absurd in almost all cases
The only thing I ask is for truthfulness. By your comments you don't care about that.
Yet you use MSNBC and CNN as reliable news sources.
of course.
they are not really liberal enough for me but they do at least get facts right despite not diving as deep as I would like
They don't get the facts right and are selective in their reporting. If something happens that goes against the narrative they just don't report the story. I wish news outlets would report all the information good or bad on all the politicians and issues so sound judgment could be made. If you are Conservative you get all bad stories if you are Liberal all good stories. You can't find any stories about the Obama scandals while he ws president in the main stream media. They went out of their way to protect him. I did not want to persecute Obama just be truthful, call it the same both ways. I ask to much because that will never happen.
if you say so.
only thing I can agree with is that they are narrative driven but they are not liberal enough.
I perfer Democracy Now, far more professional but still MSNBC despite there slightly conservative bias on some shows is still miles better than any conservative programming which is out right unbelievably absurd in almost all cases
The only thing I ask is for truthfulness. By your comments you don't care about that.
conservative media lies, nearly about everything and the reason they are absurd is because they lie so often.
the channels you mention do not.
so what is it you are asking me again about 'truthfulness' and how i dont care about it?
I don't know, him buying that Burger and asking for Dijon was a pretty big deal for the right wing media. They went on for days about that, especially Hannity.
His entire administration was a scandal. From the Beer summit, Fast and Furious, Obamacare, Bengasi, the IRS, Clinton Email and his world wide apology tour.
Beer Summit: I don't see what you take issue with here.
Fast and Furious: An operation conducted by ATF between 2006 and 2011. Good luck with pegging this on Obama.
Obamacare: Not the way I wanted to see healthcare handled, but a scandal? Really?
Benghazi: The fact that you're willing to point fingers while misspelling the city where this incident took place, is a scandal.
The IRS: Members of my family were actually targeted by the IRS for no reason. That doesn't mean Obama told them to do it.
Clinton Email: This is Hillary's problem....
Worldwide Apology Tour: It amazes me that the right can look at diplomacy as a bad thing. Good job, knuckle-draggers.
Meanwhile you support a president that blows up twitter more than a 16 year old girl. You support a president that said, on tape, that he just #grabsthatpussy because women won't say no to him and that when you have money, you can do whatever you want. You support a president that nails hookers and porn stars while his wife is pregnant, and then has his lawyer pay them to keep quiet. Good job!
What about how under him the NRA did a dragnet on the whole world?
Fast and Furious was under Obama. Gun Walker took place under Bush. Under Bush no guns went to Mexico and no one got killed as happened under Obama's Fast and Furious.
Hillary's email happened on his watch with his approval and knowledge.
Obamacare again took place on his watch with him his full support. He illegally changed it 30 times. Democrats has to be bought off with tax payer money to get enough votes for it to pass. Besides being an absolute terrible bill.
IRS Again this happened under Obama's watch with his approval, as it supported his 2012 re-election campaign.
His apology tour was not diplomacy it was blaming the United States for everything wrong in the world. Besides things only got worse.
The Beer Summit was his opening salvo in his war on the police.
All your examples are Infowars-level conspiracies that have been debunked numerous times. Fast and furious, especially, strikes me as something that has repeatedly been debunked and shown to have nothing to do with President Obama, yet here you are years later acting as if it's not only true, but the most relevant thing despite everyone being even remotely close to it having left public service years ago. Take off the tinfoil hat, dude.
His entire administration was a scandal. From the Beer summit, Fast and Furious, Obamacare, Bengasi, the IRS, Clinton Email and his world wide apology tour.
Beer Summit: I don't see what you take issue with here.
Fast and Furious: An operation conducted by ATF between 2006 and 2011. Good luck with pegging this on Obama.
Obamacare: Not the way I wanted to see healthcare handled, but a scandal? Really?
Benghazi: The fact that you're willing to point fingers while misspelling the city where this incident took place, is a scandal.
The IRS: Members of my family were actually targeted by the IRS for no reason. That doesn't mean Obama told them to do it.
Clinton Email: This is Hillary's problem....
Worldwide Apology Tour: It amazes me that the right can look at diplomacy as a bad thing. Good job, knuckle-draggers.
Meanwhile you support a president that blows up twitter more than a 16 year old girl. You support a president that said, on tape, that he just #grabsthatpussy because women won't say no to him and that when you have money, you can do whatever you want. You support a president that nails hookers and porn stars while his wife is pregnant, and then has his lawyer pay them to keep quiet. Good job!
What about how under him the NRA did a dragnet on the whole world?
Fast and Furious was under Obama. Gun Walker took place under Bush. Under Bush no guns went to Mexico and no one got killed as happened under Obama's Fast and Furious.
Hillary's email happened on his watch with his approval and knowledge.
Obamacare again took place on his watch with him his full support. He illegally changed it 30 times. Democrats has to be bought off with tax payer money to get enough votes for it to pass. Besides being an absolute terrible bill.
IRS Again this happened under Obama's watch with his approval, as it supported his 2012 re-election campaign.
His apology tour was not diplomacy it was blaming the United States for everything wrong in the world. Besides things only got worse.
The Beer Summit was his opening salvo in his war on the police.
All your examples are Infowars-level conspiracies that have been debunked numerous times. Fast and furious, especially, strikes me as something that has repeatedly been debunked and shown to have nothing to do with President Obama, yet here you are years later acting as if it's not only true, but the most relevant thing despite everyone being even remotely close to it having left public service years ago. Take off the tinfoil hat, dude.
The NSA dragnetting the world was admitted in front of congress.
His entire administration was a scandal. From the Beer summit, Fast and Furious, Obamacare, Bengasi, the IRS, Clinton Email and his world wide apology tour.
Beer Summit: I don't see what you take issue with here.
Fast and Furious: An operation conducted by ATF between 2006 and 2011. Good luck with pegging this on Obama.
Obamacare: Not the way I wanted to see healthcare handled, but a scandal? Really?
Benghazi: The fact that you're willing to point fingers while misspelling the city where this incident took place, is a scandal.
The IRS: Members of my family were actually targeted by the IRS for no reason. That doesn't mean Obama told them to do it.
Clinton Email: This is Hillary's problem....
Worldwide Apology Tour: It amazes me that the right can look at diplomacy as a bad thing. Good job, knuckle-draggers.
Meanwhile you support a president that blows up twitter more than a 16 year old girl. You support a president that said, on tape, that he just #grabsthatpussy because women won't say no to him and that when you have money, you can do whatever you want. You support a president that nails hookers and porn stars while his wife is pregnant, and then has his lawyer pay them to keep quiet. Good job!
What about how under him the NRA did a dragnet on the whole world?
Fast and Furious was under Obama. Gun Walker took place under Bush. Under Bush no guns went to Mexico and no one got killed as happened under Obama's Fast and Furious.
Hillary's email happened on his watch with his approval and knowledge.
Obamacare again took place on his watch with him his full support. He illegally changed it 30 times. Democrats has to be bought off with tax payer money to get enough votes for it to pass. Besides being an absolute terrible bill.
IRS Again this happened under Obama's watch with his approval, as it supported his 2012 re-election campaign.
His apology tour was not diplomacy it was blaming the United States for everything wrong in the world. Besides things only got worse.
The Beer Summit was his opening salvo in his war on the police.
All your examples are Infowars-level conspiracies that have been debunked numerous times. Fast and furious, especially, strikes me as something that has repeatedly been debunked and shown to have nothing to do with President Obama, yet here you are years later acting as if it's not only true, but the most relevant thing despite everyone being even remotely close to it having left public service years ago. Take off the tinfoil hat, dude.
First of all they are not infowars conspiracies they occurred. I posted an article from the American Spectator which said the same thing. I could find other sources but why bother when you are dealing with someone who has a closed mind and lies to themselves.
Log in to comment