Elizabeth Warren dodging DNA test to prove her heritage.

  • 96 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 178881 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@LJS9502_basic said:

Trolling?

The dictator aspect was not applied to any specific party. It was applied to an individual though his party isn't doing enough to keep him in check. And for people to ignore this just shows me that the country is NOT important to them. Their perceived wins are. Which makes them unpatriotic and part of a cult of personality.

And now we veer off into crazy talk. No one is being discriminated against.

Also stop using words about disabilities as insults. It's ignorant and makes you sound like a child. I'm also tired of editing it out since it's always been against the ToU and I doubt that's changed.

If a company that is hiring is legally obligated to hire a non-white or woman, then they will literally be engaging in discrimination. You can spin this in a web of ideological or social justice rhetoric, but this is blatant discrimination by definition. You people act surprised that people votes for the party that panders to folks that want to abolish the Southern border and double down on laws that require companies to hire these minorities simply for not being white.

That's not how it works. They are expected to hire the proportion amount of employees to the proportionate amount of the demographic. Therefore if the majority of their community is a minority then they should be represented by the same percentage in the workforce.

There is no party that wants to abolish the borders in the US. Do you get all your news from the hysterical alt right sites because you sound like it.

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#52  Edited By Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts

@LJS9502_basic said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@LJS9502_basic said:

Trolling?

The dictator aspect was not applied to any specific party. It was applied to an individual though his party isn't doing enough to keep him in check. And for people to ignore this just shows me that the country is NOT important to them. Their perceived wins are. Which makes them unpatriotic and part of a cult of personality.

And now we veer off into crazy talk. No one is being discriminated against.

Also stop using words about disabilities as insults. It's ignorant and makes you sound like a child. I'm also tired of editing it out since it's always been against the ToU and I doubt that's changed.

If a company that is hiring is legally obligated to hire a non-white or woman, then they will literally be engaging in discrimination. You can spin this in a web of ideological or social justice rhetoric, but this is blatant discrimination by definition. You people act surprised that people votes for the party that panders to folks that want to abolish the Southern border and double down on laws that require companies to hire these minorities simply for not being white.

That's not how it works. They are expected to hire the proportion amount of employees to the proportionate amount of the demographic. Therefore if the majority of their community is a minority then they should be represented by the same percentage in the workforce.

There is no party that wants to abolish the borders in the US. Do you get all your news from the hysterical alt right sites because you sound like it.

If you insert Mexicans into America, you have a higher Mexican American demographic in certain areas. That means that there will be a decrease in the hiring of white Americans, and that is a decrease that wouldn't exist without inserting Mexicans. It's called displacement. Do you not follow the logic here?

What exactly do you folks consider abhorrent about these people's reasoning that are opposed to that? In no other country would you expect the native demographic to altruistically embrace the idea of being displaced by a foreign work force.

No, the Democrats don't propose an idea to abolish the border, but their only stance on illegal immigration is to grant amnesty to everyone that does it to appeal to Mexican-American votes.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 178881 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:

If you insert Mexicans into America, you have a higher Mexican American demographic in certain areas. That means that there will be a decrease in the hiring of white Americans, and that is a decrease that wouldn't exist without inserting Mexicans. It's called displacement. Do you not follow the logic here?

What exactly do you folks consider abhorrent about these people's reasoning that are opposed to that? In no other country would you expect the native demographic to altruistically embrace the idea of being displaced by a foreign work force.

No, the Democrats don't propose an idea to abolish the border, but their only stance on illegal immigration other than to support the idea that we grant amnesty to everyone that does it.

No that means that given the fact that you have 95% Mexicans then you should have roughly that same amount present in your work force. How do you have 85% white when you only have 5% percent of the populate in that demographic unless you ARE discriminating.

Avatar image for joshrmeyer
JoshRMeyer

12577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 JoshRMeyer
Member since 2015 • 12577 Posts

How hard is it to get one of her hairs and be done with this? Lol

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#55  Edited By Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts

@LJS9502_basic said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:

If you insert Mexicans into America, you have a higher Mexican American demographic in certain areas. That means that there will be a decrease in the hiring of white Americans, and that is a decrease that wouldn't exist without inserting Mexicans. It's called displacement. Do you not follow the logic here?

What exactly do you folks consider abhorrent about these people's reasoning that are opposed to that? In no other country would you expect the native demographic to altruistically embrace the idea of being displaced by a foreign work force.

No, the Democrats don't propose an idea to abolish the border, but their only stance on illegal immigration other than to support the idea that we grant amnesty to everyone that does it.

No that means that given the fact that you have 95% Mexicans then you should have roughly that same amount present in your work force. How do you have 85% white when you only have 5% percent of the populate in that demographic unless you ARE discriminating.

So your logic is that if you have 50 percent (A) and 50 percent (B), then non-discriminant hiring practices would give you a 50/50 workforce.

This is a complete abstraction from reality because it implies that these demographics do not differ culturally and will never choose to enter an occupational field according to a cultural trends.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#56  Edited By TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@LJS9502_basic said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:

If you insert Mexicans into America, you have a higher Mexican American demographic in certain areas. That means that there will be a decrease in the hiring of white Americans, and that is a decrease that wouldn't exist without inserting Mexicans. It's called displacement. Do you not follow the logic here?

What exactly do you folks consider abhorrent about these people's reasoning that are opposed to that? In no other country would you expect the native demographic to altruistically embrace the idea of being displaced by a foreign work force.

No, the Democrats don't propose an idea to abolish the border, but their only stance on illegal immigration other than to support the idea that we grant amnesty to everyone that does it.

No that means that given the fact that you have 95% Mexicans then you should have roughly that same amount present in your work force. How do you have 85% white when you only have 5% percent of the populate in that demographic unless you ARE discriminating.

So your logic is that if you have 50 percent (A) and 50 percent (B), then non-discriminant hiring practices would give you a 50/50 workforce.

This is a complete abstraction from reality because it implies that these demographics do not differ culturally and will never choose to enter an occupational field according to a cultural trends.

honestly its no longer something to worry about.

women have been going to college more than men now for awhile now and they are predicting that women will make more money then men based purely on qualifications alone.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 178881 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@LJS9502_basic said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:

If you insert Mexicans into America, you have a higher Mexican American demographic in certain areas. That means that there will be a decrease in the hiring of white Americans, and that is a decrease that wouldn't exist without inserting Mexicans. It's called displacement. Do you not follow the logic here?

What exactly do you folks consider abhorrent about these people's reasoning that are opposed to that? In no other country would you expect the native demographic to altruistically embrace the idea of being displaced by a foreign work force.

No, the Democrats don't propose an idea to abolish the border, but their only stance on illegal immigration other than to support the idea that we grant amnesty to everyone that does it.

No that means that given the fact that you have 95% Mexicans then you should have roughly that same amount present in your work force. How do you have 85% white when you only have 5% percent of the populate in that demographic unless you ARE discriminating.

So your logic is that if you have 50 percent (A) and 50 percent (B), then non-discriminant hiring practices would give you a 50/50 workforce.

This is a complete abstraction from reality because it implies that these demographics do not differ culturally and will never choose to enter an occupational field according to a cultural trends.

WTF does culture have to do with employment? Hint: nothing.

Then the employment break down in that scenario should be about even with the community.

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#58  Edited By Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts

@LJS9502_basic said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@LJS9502_basic said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:

If you insert Mexicans into America, you have a higher Mexican American demographic in certain areas. That means that there will be a decrease in the hiring of white Americans, and that is a decrease that wouldn't exist without inserting Mexicans. It's called displacement. Do you not follow the logic here?

What exactly do you folks consider abhorrent about these people's reasoning that are opposed to that? In no other country would you expect the native demographic to altruistically embrace the idea of being displaced by a foreign work force.

No, the Democrats don't propose an idea to abolish the border, but their only stance on illegal immigration other than to support the idea that we grant amnesty to everyone that does it.

No that means that given the fact that you have 95% Mexicans then you should have roughly that same amount present in your work force. How do you have 85% white when you only have 5% percent of the populate in that demographic unless you ARE discriminating.

So your logic is that if you have 50 percent (A) and 50 percent (B), then non-discriminant hiring practices would give you a 50/50 workforce.

This is a complete abstraction from reality because it implies that these demographics do not differ culturally and will never choose to enter an occupational field according to a cultural trends.

WTF does culture have to do with employment? Hint: nothing.

Then the employment break down in that scenario should be about even with the community.

Look at the NBA, and NFL for example. They have to be discriminating if we are to expect an accurate representation of the demographic. Is that not your logic? Does this not provide that different cultures lend themselves to different skill sets?

This idea that culture does not effect one's aspirations and ambitions and therefor directly influence what fields one would choose to enter and how successful and/or career focused they will be is completely asinine.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#59  Edited By TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@LJS9502_basic said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@LJS9502_basic said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:

If you insert Mexicans into America, you have a higher Mexican American demographic in certain areas. That means that there will be a decrease in the hiring of white Americans, and that is a decrease that wouldn't exist without inserting Mexicans. It's called displacement. Do you not follow the logic here?

What exactly do you folks consider abhorrent about these people's reasoning that are opposed to that? In no other country would you expect the native demographic to altruistically embrace the idea of being displaced by a foreign work force.

No, the Democrats don't propose an idea to abolish the border, but their only stance on illegal immigration other than to support the idea that we grant amnesty to everyone that does it.

No that means that given the fact that you have 95% Mexicans then you should have roughly that same amount present in your work force. How do you have 85% white when you only have 5% percent of the populate in that demographic unless you ARE discriminating.

So your logic is that if you have 50 percent (A) and 50 percent (B), then non-discriminant hiring practices would give you a 50/50 workforce.

This is a complete abstraction from reality because it implies that these demographics do not differ culturally and will never choose to enter an occupational field according to a cultural trends.

WTF does culture have to do with employment? Hint: nothing.

Then the employment break down in that scenario should be about even with the community.

Look at the NBA, and NFL for example. They have to be discriminating if we are to expect an accurate representation of the demographic. Is that not your logic?

Besides that, my point is that this idea that culture does not effect one's aspirations and ambitions and therefor directly influence what fields one would choose to enter and how successful and/or career focused they will be is completely asinine.

the trend is changing.

mens days as a standard leadership role are likely to be more a minority than a majority.

this is based on trends we see already and the wave is massive and unstoppable.

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#60  Edited By Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts

@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@LJS9502_basic said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:

So your logic is that if you have 50 percent (A) and 50 percent (B), then non-discriminant hiring practices would give you a 50/50 workforce.

This is a complete abstraction from reality because it implies that these demographics do not differ culturally and will never choose to enter an occupational field according to a cultural trends.

WTF does culture have to do with employment? Hint: nothing.

Then the employment break down in that scenario should be about even with the community.

Look at the NBA, and NFL for example. They have to be discriminating if we are to expect an accurate representation of the demographic. Is that not your logic?

Besides that, my point is that this idea that culture does not effect one's aspirations and ambitions and therefor directly influence what fields one would choose to enter and how successful and/or career focused they will be is completely asinine.

the trend is changing.

mens days as a standard leadership role are likely to be more a minority than a majority.

this is based on trends we see already and the wave is massive and unstoppable.

That's because more men are pretending to be women and doing it better than women.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#61 TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@LJS9502_basic said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:

So your logic is that if you have 50 percent (A) and 50 percent (B), then non-discriminant hiring practices would give you a 50/50 workforce.

This is a complete abstraction from reality because it implies that these demographics do not differ culturally and will never choose to enter an occupational field according to a cultural trends.

WTF does culture have to do with employment? Hint: nothing.

Then the employment break down in that scenario should be about even with the community.

Look at the NBA, and NFL for example. They have to be discriminating if we are to expect an accurate representation of the demographic. Is that not your logic?

Besides that, my point is that this idea that culture does not effect one's aspirations and ambitions and therefor directly influence what fields one would choose to enter and how successful and/or career focused they will be is completely asinine.

the trend is changing.

mens days as a standard leadership role are likely to be more a minority than a majority.

this is based on trends we see already and the wave is massive and unstoppable.

That's because more men are taping and/or removing their genitals and pretending to be women.

the facts are more women are going to college then men, more women are finishing college then men.

simply because of real tactile physics women becoming the majority of leaders is highly likely now.

what are men doing? I dont know I can only speculate I dont have the numbers

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#62  Edited By Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts

@tryit said:

the facts are more women are going to college then men, more women are finishing college then men.

simply because of real tactile physics women becoming the majority of leaders is highly likely now.

what are men doing? I dont know I can only speculate I dont have the numbers

Yet we have a feminist narrative and entire field of academics that revolves around this idea that boo hoo hoo women are oppressed because society. Ironic, is it not?

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#63  Edited By TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:

the facts are more women are going to college then men, more women are finishing college then men.

simply because of real tactile physics women becoming the majority of leaders is highly likely now.

what are men doing? I dont know I can only speculate I dont have the numbers

Yet we have a feminist narrative and entire field of academics that revolves around this idea that boo hoo hoo women are oppressed because society. Ironic, is it not?

its not ironic yet but it will be.

its still another 10-15 years off or so. but average wages for women have been increasing already.

for me however they should consider that another thing that is 10-15 years off is massive automation (robots). so what are the skills of men?

resistance at this point is fuitle

and the thing is, the men who are complaining about how unfair the world is that a developer makes a game with a female lead all the while saying there should be legislation against lootboxes will absolutely be left behind zero question about it

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#64  Edited By Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts

@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:

the facts are more women are going to college then men, more women are finishing college then men.

simply because of real tactile physics women becoming the majority of leaders is highly likely now.

what are men doing? I dont know I can only speculate I dont have the numbers

Yet we have a feminist narrative and entire field of academics that revolves around this idea that boo hoo hoo women are oppressed because society. Ironic, is it not?

its not ironic yet but it will be.

its still another 10-15 years off or so. but average wages for women have been increasing already.

for me however they should consider that another thing that is 10-15 years off is massive automation (robots). so what are the skills of men?

resistance at this point is fuitle

The average IQ of men and women is about the same. The difference is that there is more of a disparity in men, meaning that the number of men that are borderline retarded is higher than women, but the number of men that are geniuses is much higher than women.

This idea that women are suddenly going to encompass a majority of the intellectuals, inventors, and innovators in society is laughable. In reality, the idea that men are failing (which they definitely are) is going to lead to failures of society. Implying that this is a good thing is like praising the idea that your home is on fire because the flames are providing you with warmth.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#65  Edited By TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:

the facts are more women are going to college then men, more women are finishing college then men.

simply because of real tactile physics women becoming the majority of leaders is highly likely now.

what are men doing? I dont know I can only speculate I dont have the numbers

Yet we have a feminist narrative and entire field of academics that revolves around this idea that boo hoo hoo women are oppressed because society. Ironic, is it not?

its not ironic yet but it will be.

its still another 10-15 years off or so. but average wages for women have been increasing already.

for me however they should consider that another thing that is 10-15 years off is massive automation (robots). so what are the skills of men?

resistance at this point is fuitle

The average IQ of men and women is about the same. The difference is that there is more of a disparity in men, meaning that the number of men that are borderline retarded is higher than women, but the number of men that are geniuses is much higher than women.

This idea that women are suddenly going to encompass a majority of the intellectuals, inventors, and innovators in society is laughable. In reality, the idea that men are failing (which they definitely are) is going to lead to failures of society. The idea that this is a good thing is like praising the idea that your home is on fire because the flames are providing you with warmth.

sorry but its already happening.

more women (by a large margin) have been going and finishing college more than men and its a trend that has been going on for a long time now.

So unless all those men are becoming self taught computer programmers the then the reason womens pay has gone up to 75 cents to the dollar is painfully easy to see.

the question is, in the age of automation what are men doing for job protection I wonder?

but regardless, the men who are sitting at home complaining about how unfair the world is because a developer makes a game with a female lead saying that people are 'forcing' them to do it all the while saying there should be legislation against toolboxes will absolutely positively be left behind

baby boomers are retiring and the demograhics are changing rapidly.

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#66  Edited By Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts

@tryit said:

sorry but its already happening.

more women (by a large margin) have been going and finishing college more than men and its a trend that has been going on for a long time now.

So unless all those men are becoming self taught computer programmers the then the reason womens pay has gone up to 75 cents to the dollar is painfully easy to see.

the question is, in the age of automation what are men doing for job protection I wonder?

but regardless, the men who are sitting at home complaining about how unfair the world is because a developer makes a game with a female lead saying that people are 'forcing' them to do it all the while saying there should be legislation against toolboxes will absolutely positively be left behind

baby boomers are retiring and the demograhics are changing rapidly.

Men becoming less competent is not a positive trend for society. Keep gloating that your house is on fire.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#67 TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:

sorry but its already happening.

more women (by a large margin) have been going and finishing college more than men and its a trend that has been going on for a long time now.

So unless all those men are becoming self taught computer programmers the then the reason womens pay has gone up to 75 cents to the dollar is painfully easy to see.

the question is, in the age of automation what are men doing for job protection I wonder?

but regardless, the men who are sitting at home complaining about how unfair the world is because a developer makes a game with a female lead saying that people are 'forcing' them to do it all the while saying there should be legislation against toolboxes will absolutely positively be left behind

baby boomers are retiring and the demograhics are changing rapidly.

Men becoming less competent is not a positive trend for society. Keep gloating that your house is on fire.

I am not making a judgement either way, I am just illustrating to you what is inevitable reality.

and I can assure you complaining about developers making female leads is only going to make your life worse in the process

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#68 Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts
@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:

Men becoming less competent is not a positive trend for society. Keep gloating that your house is on fire.

I am not making a judgement either way, I am just illustrating to you what is inevitable reality.

and I can assure you complaining about developers making female leads is only going to make your life worse in the process

Women can slave away to be society's primary earners while men sit at home and shitpost on the internet. Sounds good to me.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#69  Edited By TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:

Men becoming less competent is not a positive trend for society. Keep gloating that your house is on fire.

I am not making a judgement either way, I am just illustrating to you what is inevitable reality.

and I can assure you complaining about developers making female leads is only going to make your life worse in the process

Women can slave away to be society's primary earners while men sit at home and shitpost on the internet. Sounds good to me.

me as well! love it!

if lucky might even play male lead games

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#70 Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts

@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:

Men becoming less competent is not a positive trend for society. Keep gloating that your house is on fire.

I am not making a judgement either way, I am just illustrating to you what is inevitable reality.

and I can assure you complaining about developers making female leads is only going to make your life worse in the process

Women can slave away to be society's primary earners while men sit at home and shitpost on the internet. Sounds good to me.

me as well! love it!

if lucky might even play male lead games

And then we can get attention and praise from the press whenever we talk about how oppressed we are and all the other shit that comes with being incompetent in a developed society.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#71 TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:

Men becoming less competent is not a positive trend for society. Keep gloating that your house is on fire.

I am not making a judgement either way, I am just illustrating to you what is inevitable reality.

and I can assure you complaining about developers making female leads is only going to make your life worse in the process

Women can slave away to be society's primary earners while men sit at home and shitpost on the internet. Sounds good to me.

me as well! love it!

if lucky might even play male lead games

And then we can get attention and praise from the press whenever we talk about how oppressed we are and all the other shit that comes with being incompetent in a developed society.

why would we want that?

wanting 'attention and praise'.....kind sounds snowflaky dont you think?

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#72  Edited By Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts
@tryit said:

why would we want that?

wanting 'attention and praise'.....kind sounds snowflaky dont you think?

Of course, but why not? If society can function without us and we can depend on someone elses income then why not play a game where we make a scene for victim bux? What else are we going to do? Git gud? **** that. I'll just shit my pants and blame everyone else for making me do it.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#73 TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:

why would we want that?

wanting 'attention and praise'.....kind sounds snowflaky dont you think?

Of course, but why not? If society can function without us and we can depend on someone elses income then why not play a game where we make a scene for victim bux? What else are we going to do? Git gud? **** that. I'll just shit my pants and blame everyone else for making me do it.

why would you do that? sounds excessively snowflaky to throw a fit about not getting attention and phrase dont you think?

you think its wise to just follow the habits of your opposition? why would you want to go down to their level?

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#74 Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts
@tryit said:

why would you do that? sounds excessively snowflaky to throw a fit about not getting attention and phrase dont you think?

you think its wise to just follow the habits of your opposition? why would you want to go down to their level?

It's not about being wise, it's about justice and equality. Since women are dominating society, we need to advocate for social justice. We need to make a scene and act as incompetent as possible in public so everyone feels sorry for us. What do we have to lose?

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#75  Edited By TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:

why would you do that? sounds excessively snowflaky to throw a fit about not getting attention and phrase dont you think?

you think its wise to just follow the habits of your opposition? why would you want to go down to their level?

It's not about being wise, it's about justice and equality. Since women are dominating society, we need to advocate for social justice. We need to make a scene and act as incompetent as possible in public so everyone feels sorry for us. What do we have to lose?

its about being just?

like a SJW snowflake? (I add the snowflake because it appears you want to justice for something that is unimportant 'recognition'...lol)

you are sounds a LOT like a lefy snowflake right now why are you following their lead in how to be?

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#76  Edited By Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts
@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:

why would you do that? sounds excessively snowflaky to throw a fit about not getting attention and phrase dont you think?

you think its wise to just follow the habits of your opposition? why would you want to go down to their level?

It's not about being wise, it's about justice and equality. Since women are dominating society, we need to advocate for social justice. We need to make a scene and act as incompetent as possible in public so everyone feels sorry for us. What do we have to lose?

its about being just?

like a SJW snowflake? (I add the snowflake because it appears you want to justice for something that is unimportant 'recognition'...lol)

you are sounds a LOT like a lefy snowflake right now why are you following their lead in how to be?

Yeah, that's what Hitler said before he killed 600 million people.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#77 TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:

why would you do that? sounds excessively snowflaky to throw a fit about not getting attention and phrase dont you think?

you think its wise to just follow the habits of your opposition? why would you want to go down to their level?

It's not about being wise, it's about justice and equality. Since women are dominating society, we need to advocate for social justice. We need to make a scene and act as incompetent as possible in public so everyone feels sorry for us. What do we have to lose?

its about being just?

like a SJW snowflake? (I add the snowflake because it appears you want to justice for something that is unimportant 'recognition'...lol)

you are sounds a LOT like a lefy snowflake right now why are you following their lead in how to be?

Yeah, that's what Hitler said before he killed 600 million people.

I am reading what you said, reading what I said, I cant connect the two

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#78  Edited By Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts

@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:

It's not about being wise, it's about justice and equality. Since women are dominating society, we need to advocate for social justice. We need to make a scene and act as incompetent as possible in public so everyone feels sorry for us. What do we have to lose?

its about being just?

like a SJW snowflake? (I add the snowflake because it appears you want to justice for something that is unimportant 'recognition'...lol)

you are sounds a LOT like a lefy snowflake right now why are you following their lead in how to be?

Yeah, that's what Hitler said before he killed 600 million people.

I am reading what you said, reading what I said, I cant connect the two

It's fascistic to say that justice is simply "unimportant recognition lol". If everyone was like you we be burning people in ovens right now. Trump is literally Hitler. Black lives matter.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#79 TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:

It's not about being wise, it's about justice and equality. Since women are dominating society, we need to advocate for social justice. We need to make a scene and act as incompetent as possible in public so everyone feels sorry for us. What do we have to lose?

its about being just?

like a SJW snowflake? (I add the snowflake because it appears you want to justice for something that is unimportant 'recognition'...lol)

you are sounds a LOT like a lefy snowflake right now why are you following their lead in how to be?

Yeah, that's what Hitler said before he killed 600 million people.

I am reading what you said, reading what I said, I cant connect the two

It's fascistic to say that justice is simply "unimportant recognition lol". If everyone was like you we be burning people in ovens right now. Trump is literally Hitler. Black lives matter.

1. again, trump is not literally Hitler and I have never made that comparison, never would make that comparison, dont know anyone on the left who has ever made that comparison and for SPECIFIC reasons. Hitler was evil, but he was also smart. Trump is not, he can be as evil as he wants to be he would never be like Hitler, never in a million years.

2. I was not making a correlation between justice and 'getting recognition.

3. you are the one who is jealous that other people are getting recognition and you are not and you find that unfair. Read that about 15 times and tell me what it sounds like to you?

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#80  Edited By Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts

@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:

Yeah, that's what Hitler said before he killed 600 million people.

I am reading what you said, reading what I said, I cant connect the two

It's fascistic to say that justice is simply "unimportant recognition lol". If everyone was like you we be burning people in ovens right now. Trump is literally Hitler. Black lives matter.

1. again, trump is not literally Hitler and I have never made that comparison, never would make that comparison, dont know anyone on the left who has ever made that comparison and for SPECIFIC reasons. Hitler was evil, but he was also smart. Trump is not, he can be as evil as he wants to be he would never be like Hitler, never in a million years.

2. I was not making a correlation between justice and 'getting recognition.

3. you are the one who is jealous that other people are getting recognition and you are not and you find that unfair. Read that about 15 times and tell me what it sounds like to you?

But Trump is a fascist. Fact.

I'm not sure why you're mocking my position on social justice. I want a world where people aren't oppressed for being born incompetent.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#81  Edited By TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:

I am reading what you said, reading what I said, I cant connect the two

It's fascistic to say that justice is simply "unimportant recognition lol". If everyone was like you we be burning people in ovens right now. Trump is literally Hitler. Black lives matter.

1. again, trump is not literally Hitler and I have never made that comparison, never would make that comparison, dont know anyone on the left who has ever made that comparison and for SPECIFIC reasons. Hitler was evil, but he was also smart. Trump is not, he can be as evil as he wants to be he would never be like Hitler, never in a million years.

2. I was not making a correlation between justice and 'getting recognition.

3. you are the one who is jealous that other people are getting recognition and you are not and you find that unfair. Read that about 15 times and tell me what it sounds like to you?

But Trump is a fascist. Fact.

I'm not sure why you're mocking my position on social justice. I want a world where people aren't oppressed for being born incompetent.

but not all fascists are or could be like Hitler.

see?

its very clear distinction here as to why nobody on the left compares him to Hitler specifically. a very specific reason and its not because they would be afraid to but a different reason...would you like to know what that reason is?

YOUR Words:

'I want a world where people aren't oppressed for being born incompetent.'

that is how you are stating you believe, that is what YOU are STATING is your position, that is not mine, I do not share your position

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#82  Edited By Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts

@tryit said:

but not all fascists are or could be like Hitler.

see?

its very clear distinction here as to why nobody on the left compares him to Hitler specifically. a very specific reason and its not because they would be afraid to but a different reason...would you like to know what that reason is?

No he's just like Hitler. Only fascists disagree. I should be able to be as incompetent as I want and still have everything I feel entitled to. I want people in games that look just like me in the name of justice. I don't care if the game's story suffers because of it. I'm tired of being oppressed. Disagree and you're clearly privileged and your opinion doesn't matter.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#83  Edited By TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:

but not all fascists are or could be like Hitler.

see?

its very clear distinction here as to why nobody on the left compares him to Hitler specifically. a very specific reason and its not because they would be afraid to but a different reason...would you like to know what that reason is?

No he's just like Hitler. Only fascists disagree. I should be able to be as incompetent as I want and still have everything I feel entitled to. I want people in games that look just like me in the name of justice. I don't care if the game's story suffers because of it. I'm tired of being oppressed. Disagree and you're clearly privileged and your opinion doesn't matter.

ok.. the only person who is saying Trump is like Hitler is YOU

nobody on the left says that. and for specific reason, would you like to know what that specific reason is?

YOU are saying 'should be able to be as incompetent as I want and still have everything I feel entitled to.'

YOUR position, not mine

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#84  Edited By Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts

@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:

but not all fascists are or could be like Hitler.

see?

its very clear distinction here as to why nobody on the left compares him to Hitler specifically. a very specific reason and its not because they would be afraid to but a different reason...would you like to know what that reason is?

No he's just like Hitler. Only fascists disagree. I should be able to be as incompetent as I want and still have everything I feel entitled to. I want people in games that look just like me in the name of justice. I don't care if the game's story suffers because of it. I'm tired of being oppressed. Disagree and you're clearly privileged and your opinion doesn't matter.

ok.. the only person who is saying Trump is like Hitler is YOU

nobody on the left says that. and for specific reason, would you like to know what that specific reason is?

YOU are saying 'should be able to be as incompetent as I want and still have everything I feel entitled to.'

YOUR position, not mine

He is like Hitler. I'm not claiming to say otherwise.

How dare you criticize my views from your position of privilege. Sometimes you just need to listen. I'm oppressed. Why would someone claim to be oppressed if it weren't so?

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#85  Edited By TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:

but not all fascists are or could be like Hitler.

see?

its very clear distinction here as to why nobody on the left compares him to Hitler specifically. a very specific reason and its not because they would be afraid to but a different reason...would you like to know what that reason is?

No he's just like Hitler. Only fascists disagree. I should be able to be as incompetent as I want and still have everything I feel entitled to. I want people in games that look just like me in the name of justice. I don't care if the game's story suffers because of it. I'm tired of being oppressed. Disagree and you're clearly privileged and your opinion doesn't matter.

ok.. the only person who is saying Trump is like Hitler is YOU

nobody on the left says that. and for specific reason, would you like to know what that specific reason is?

YOU are saying 'should be able to be as incompetent as I want and still have everything I feel entitled to.'

YOUR position, not mine

He is like Hitler. I'm claiming to say otherwise.

How dare you criticize my views from your position of privilege. Sometimes you just need to listen. I'm oppressed. Why would someone claim to be oppressed if it weren't so?

the reason your believe that everyone who is incompetent should have the same treatment as others is that it brings everyone down. access is and should be granted on aptitude. By your view of the world anyone should have access to something like nuclear weapons regardless of if they are competent or not to handle them.

I do not agree with your view on that subject.

I also do not agree that Trump is like Hitler, Trump is not smart enough to be an evil mastermind. I understand you feel Trump is like Hitler and I see how you make that correlation but I do not agree with your assessment.

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#86  Edited By Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts

@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:

No he's just like Hitler. Only fascists disagree. I should be able to be as incompetent as I want and still have everything I feel entitled to. I want people in games that look just like me in the name of justice. I don't care if the game's story suffers because of it. I'm tired of being oppressed. Disagree and you're clearly privileged and your opinion doesn't matter.

ok.. the only person who is saying Trump is like Hitler is YOU

nobody on the left says that. and for specific reason, would you like to know what that specific reason is?

YOU are saying 'should be able to be as incompetent as I want and still have everything I feel entitled to.'

YOUR position, not mine

He is like Hitler. I'm claiming to say otherwise.

How dare you criticize my views from your position of privilege. Sometimes you just need to listen. I'm oppressed. Why would someone claim to be oppressed if it weren't so?

the reason your believe that everyone who is incompetent should have the same treatment as others is that it brings everyone down. access is and should be granted on aptitude. By your view of the world anyone should have access to something like nuclear weapons regardless of if they are competent or not to handle them.

I do not agree with your view on that subject.

I also do not agree that Trump is like Hitler, Trump is not smart enough to be an evil mastermind. I understand you feel Trump is like Hitler and I see how you make that correlation but I do not agree with your assessment.

But "aptitude" is code for bigotry. You know the systems rigged against me. Keep talking from your position of privilege thinking you know what the rest of the world experiences. I need more people in games that look like me too. I don't care if it comes off being ideological pandering.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#87 TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:

No he's just like Hitler. Only fascists disagree. I should be able to be as incompetent as I want and still have everything I feel entitled to. I want people in games that look just like me in the name of justice. I don't care if the game's story suffers because of it. I'm tired of being oppressed. Disagree and you're clearly privileged and your opinion doesn't matter.

ok.. the only person who is saying Trump is like Hitler is YOU

nobody on the left says that. and for specific reason, would you like to know what that specific reason is?

YOU are saying 'should be able to be as incompetent as I want and still have everything I feel entitled to.'

YOUR position, not mine

He is like Hitler. I'm claiming to say otherwise.

How dare you criticize my views from your position of privilege. Sometimes you just need to listen. I'm oppressed. Why would someone claim to be oppressed if it weren't so?

the reason your believe that everyone who is incompetent should have the same treatment as others is that it brings everyone down. access is and should be granted on aptitude. By your view of the world anyone should have access to something like nuclear weapons regardless of if they are competent or not to handle them.

I do not agree with your view on that subject.

I also do not agree that Trump is like Hitler, Trump is not smart enough to be an evil mastermind. I understand you feel Trump is like Hitler and I see how you make that correlation but I do not agree with your assessment.

But "aptitude" is code for bigotry. You know the systems rigged against me. Keep talking from your position of privilege thinking you know what the rest of the world experiences. I need more people in games that look like me too. I don't care if it comes off being ideological pandering.

I dont care if its code word for bigotry or not.

I dont care if I am a bigot.

access based on aptitude should be restrictive and incompetence should not be allowed the same access as people with aptitude. PEROID, I dont care what you call it

I dont agree with you.

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#88 Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts

@tryit said:

I dont care if its code word for bigotry or not.

I dont care if I am a bigot.

access based on aptitude should be restrictive and incompetence should not be allowed the same access as people with aptitude. PEROID, I dont care what you call it

I dont agree with you.

That's because you're privileged. How obtuse and selfish can you be? Why can't someone like me have anything nice just because of who I am?

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#89  Edited By TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:

I dont care if its code word for bigotry or not.

I dont care if I am a bigot.

access based on aptitude should be restrictive and incompetence should not be allowed the same access as people with aptitude. PEROID, I dont care what you call it

I dont agree with you.

That's because you're privileged. How obtuse and selfish can you be? Why can't someone like me have anything nice just because of who I am?

ok I am privileged (and by the way I actually am)

but other than throwing around labels you havent explained in detail why you think people who are unqualified should have the same access as people who are qualified.

that sounds aweful

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#90 Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts

@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:

I dont care if its code word for bigotry or not.

I dont care if I am a bigot.

access based on aptitude should be restrictive and incompetence should not be allowed the same access as people with aptitude. PEROID, I dont care what you call it

I dont agree with you.

That's because you're privileged. How obtuse and selfish can you be? Why can't someone like me have anything nice just because of who I am?

ok I am privalaged

but other than throwing around labels you havent explained in detail why you think people who are unqualified should have the same access as people who are qualified.

that sounds aweful

because the system is rigged to "disqualify" people on the basis of them having certain inalienable characteristics. Also, you've already admitted that you don't care you're a bigot. So all you're doing is spewing hate speech. Yeah people like me just "aren't qualified". Taking us right back to Jim Crowe.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#91  Edited By TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:

I dont care if its code word for bigotry or not.

I dont care if I am a bigot.

access based on aptitude should be restrictive and incompetence should not be allowed the same access as people with aptitude. PEROID, I dont care what you call it

I dont agree with you.

That's because you're privileged. How obtuse and selfish can you be? Why can't someone like me have anything nice just because of who I am?

ok I am privalaged

but other than throwing around labels you havent explained in detail why you think people who are unqualified should have the same access as people who are qualified.

that sounds aweful

because the system is rigged to "disqualify" people on the basis of them having certain inalienable characteristics. Also, you've already admitted that you don't care you're a bigot. So all you're doing is spewing hate speech. Yeah people like me just "aren't qualified". Taking us right back to Jim Crowe.

try to be coherent.

because there is a difference between ACTUAL incompetence and FALSE incompetence.

you seem to be suggesting the actually are qualified but labeled as not. That is different then your original assertion.\

I am referring to actual incompetence which you think actual incompetence should still be rewarded with full access.

(here is what I know about you: you like to focus on labels, I like to focus on substance, labels do not affect me its a waste of time)

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#92  Edited By Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts

@tryit said:

try to be coherent.

because there is a difference between ACTUAL incompetence and FALSE incompetence.

you seem to be suggesting the actually are qualified but labeled as not. That is different then your original assertion.\

I am referring to actual incompetence which you think actual incompetence should still be rewarded with full access.

I've been labeled as incompetent by privileged people. And you think that just because people discriminate that I should not have access. What a world we live in where people like you think it's just acceptable that society has different standards for different people just because they were born a certain way.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#93  Edited By TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:

try to be coherent.

because there is a difference between ACTUAL incompetence and FALSE incompetence.

you seem to be suggesting the actually are qualified but labeled as not. That is different then your original assertion.\

I am referring to actual incompetence which you think actual incompetence should still be rewarded with full access.

I've been labeled as incompetent by privileged people. And you think that just because people discriminate that I should not have access. What a world we live in where people like you think it's just acceptable that society has different standards for different people just because they were born a certain way.

here is what I know about you in detail.

you are trying to get me offended by labels. I should warn you its not worth it, I am not affected by labels, I am only affected by substance, its not worth the risk on your part. I am immune to standard attempts at insult labeling, its a lost cause

I am taking a break because its boring

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#94  Edited By Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts
@tryit said:

here is what I know about you in detail.

you are trying to get me offended by labels. I should warn you its not worth it, I am not affected by labels, I am only affected by substance, its not worth the risk on your part.

I am taking a break because its boring

Because you have zero arguments besides "but muh labels". Enjoy your privilege, or as you say, "privalage".

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#95 TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@tryit said:

here is what I know about you in detail.

you are trying to get me offended by labels. I should warn you its not worth it, I am not affected by labels, I am only affected by substance, its not worth the risk on your part.

I am taking a break because its boring

Because you have zero arguments besides "but muh labels". Enjoy your privilege, or as you say, "privalage".

I am going to move on because I have become bored with this game but I do want to leave you with something to think about.

For all your attempts at throwing labels around it appears what you have illustrated is that the group that has the thin skin is actually NOT the left but rather....the thin skinners are the people on the right.

labels bore me, call me whatever you like, i will never report it, I respect free speech even if its an attempt to insult

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#96  Edited By Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts

@tryit said:

I am going to move on because I have become bored with this game but I do want to leave you with something to think about.

For all your attempts at throwing labels around it appears what you have illustrated is that the group that has the thin skin is actually NOT the left but rather....the thin skinners are the people on the right.

labels bore me, call me whatever you like, i will never report it, I respect free speech even if its an attempt to insult

Nice joke. There's an entire leftist playbook designated to labeling every aspect of conservative politics including Trump's Supporters as some sort of "ist/ism" or "phobe". What this proves is that you're entirely partisan when it comes your criticism of political views if you honestly think that most people on the left don't slander their opposition with labels or that this is exclusive to the right. The reality is that you're only critical of views that do not conform to your political alignment.

Avatar image for piisexactly4
Piisexactly4

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#97 Piisexactly4
Member since 2017 • 65 Posts
@mrbojangles25 said:
@piisexactly4 said:

Source is shit, but.....it is super shady that she claims to be a native and used that to get a high paying job. Looking at her, I'd be surprised if she had any in her.

"Looking at her..."

Right, because you can tell people's race so easily. Tell me, how do you tell when someone is 1/16 Korean? Are their eyes slanted? Do they have black hair? What about Native American? Do they have darker skin? Or specific nose shapes?

Maybe we should get out our calipers and take measurements!

I'm 1/4 latino, but you wouldn't know it from looking at me. with my blond hair and blue eyes.

Point is that because of this, it makes it super easy to lie, and all politicians are liars.....

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

58534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#98 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 58534 Posts

@piisexactly4 said:
@mrbojangles25 said:
@piisexactly4 said:

Source is shit, but.....it is super shady that she claims to be a native and used that to get a high paying job. Looking at her, I'd be surprised if she had any in her.

"Looking at her..."

Right, because you can tell people's race so easily. Tell me, how do you tell when someone is 1/16 Korean? Are their eyes slanted? Do they have black hair? What about Native American? Do they have darker skin? Or specific nose shapes?

Maybe we should get out our calipers and take measurements!

I'm 1/4 latino, but you wouldn't know it from looking at me. with my blond hair and blue eyes.

Point is that because of this, it makes it super easy to lie, and all politicians are liars.....

Right, so it's pointless. I mean American Indian or not, the last thing we want to do is create culture where it's OK to publicly call for genetic testing of people, make race-based jokes based on one's heritage, and so forth.

Just let it go, calling her on the lie is less important than maintaining our national integrity.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#99 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

@mrbojangles25 said:
@piisexactly4 said:
@mrbojangles25 said:
@piisexactly4 said:

Source is shit, but.....it is super shady that she claims to be a native and used that to get a high paying job. Looking at her, I'd be surprised if she had any in her.

"Looking at her..."

Right, because you can tell people's race so easily. Tell me, how do you tell when someone is 1/16 Korean? Are their eyes slanted? Do they have black hair? What about Native American? Do they have darker skin? Or specific nose shapes?

Maybe we should get out our calipers and take measurements!

I'm 1/4 latino, but you wouldn't know it from looking at me. with my blond hair and blue eyes.

Point is that because of this, it makes it super easy to lie, and all politicians are liars.....

Right, so it's pointless. I mean American Indian or not, the last thing we want to do is create culture where it's OK to publicly call for genetic testing of people, make race-based jokes based on one's heritage, and so forth.

Just let it go, calling her on the lie is less important than maintaining our national integrity.

exactly,. I'm 30% crow and i find her comments offensive.