Should the PSN cost?

  • 53 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for -NOXiK_AOPK-
-NOXiK_AOPK-

352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 -NOXiK_AOPK-
Member since 2008 • 352 Posts

Well ima start by saying yes...reasons for that is because we'd have a better online experice...

1:Sony will actually spend money(ours)on the whole look of it...(Themes,interfaces,widgets,ect.)

2:They will spend money(ours)advertising anything the possiblly could...which is not a bad thing...

3:Would spend money(ours)more exclusive content maybe out own SIM(Avitar wonnabees)

4:All that other sh!t i cant think of rigth now that every PLAYSTATION OWNER WANTS & DESERVES

aND YES I HAVE BOTH BUT IM A SONY FAN BOY AT HEART...

P.S. WE NEED TO COMPETE WITH XBOX LIVE...AND SHUT UP ALL THOSE XBOX FAN BOYS MOUTH ONCE AND FOR ALL...CKUZ EVERY1 ONE KNOWS THAT XBOX LIVE IS THE ONLY REASON IT STILL EXIST(aDMITTED YOU XBOX LOVERS YOU KNOW ITS TRUE,WE HAVE WAY BETTER CONTENT)...WE DID IT TO DREAMCAST AND WE CAN DO IT TO YOU TOO...:twisted: GO SONY!!!

Avatar image for amsfm6
amsfm6

2777

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 amsfm6
Member since 2009 • 2777 Posts

Hell no, it does exactly what it should do.

Avatar image for good_sk8er7
good_sk8er7

4327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#3 good_sk8er7
Member since 2009 • 4327 Posts

ew...no because then I won't play online. That would not be good at all.. Horrible idea I think. Although good things could come from it. I like how things look now on PSN. and I love it being FREEEEEEEEE

Avatar image for white_sox
white_sox

17442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#4 white_sox
Member since 2006 • 17442 Posts
Did you just say you wanted to pay money for ads and themes? I vote no.
Avatar image for chiko1
chiko1

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 chiko1
Member since 2006 • 203 Posts

no im glad its free and thats the way the cookie crumbles lol jk felt like writing that but no not beacause it bad or anything but it will make more people buy a ps3 over xbox even tho i like both

Avatar image for photobooth
photobooth

276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 photobooth
Member since 2004 • 276 Posts

It should always be free. If they charged money it would only be for profit. I highly doubt they'd put all that money into R&D, so it's unlikely we'd see the PSN improve at a faster pace than it is now.

Avatar image for rjxtian
rjxtian

2638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 rjxtian
Member since 2005 • 2638 Posts

PSN does everything I want it to do.

I would not be happy if it cost money, and turned into an XBL InYourFace Book experience.

Avatar image for coolkid93
coolkid93

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#8 coolkid93
Member since 2007 • 6749 Posts

Hell no, it does exactly what it should do.

amsfm6
What he said. I don't want to pay $50 dollars a year for some ONLINE service. Forget that. It goes online doesn't it? It works right? So It has no problems out of me. Yes I sometimes have problems with it but not much though.
Avatar image for Satanized
Satanized

106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Satanized
Member since 2009 • 106 Posts

Of course not. Us PS fanboys will lose bragging rights. Also, people would not want to convert to PSN when we all know xbox live has a better online comunity and experience. There is also enough mark-up on the games they publish and they would lose sales if Sony made PSN cost. So in the end, the best things in life are FREE...

Avatar image for Ninja_Zombie83
Ninja_Zombie83

1893

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#10 Ninja_Zombie83
Member since 2009 • 1893 Posts
No thank you. YOU may have extra money you don't know what to do with, but I would rather be paying for games than paying for something thats already free.
Avatar image for GC4ever
GC4ever

3044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 GC4ever
Member since 2004 • 3044 Posts

its fine the way it is
hell no i want to pay for the service
thats what makes it better than xbox live

Avatar image for deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
deactivated-57e5de5e137a4

12929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
Member since 2004 • 12929 Posts
Throwing money at it doesn't equal a better product.
Avatar image for Reiji-Arisu
Reiji-Arisu

651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Reiji-Arisu
Member since 2009 • 651 Posts
It should be free, thats the advantage it has over XBL.
Avatar image for ReaperV7
ReaperV7

6756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 ReaperV7
Member since 2008 • 6756 Posts
psn is why i no longer have xbox live gold account .
Avatar image for Epak_
Epak_

11911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 Epak_
Member since 2004 • 11911 Posts

Nah. I'm already paying for XBL...

Avatar image for WEAPON_X_RECON
WEAPON_X_RECON

232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 WEAPON_X_RECON
Member since 2009 • 232 Posts

Well ima start by saying yes...reasons for that is because we'd have a better online experice...

1:Sony will actually spend money(ours)on the whole look of it...(Themes,interfaces,widgets,ect.)

2:They will spend money(ours)advertising anything the possiblly could...which is not a bad thing...

3:Would spend money(ours)more exclusive content maybe out own SIM(Avitar wonnabees)

4:All that other sh!t i cant think of rigth now that every PLAYSTATION OWNER WANTS & DESERVES

aND YES I HAVE BOTH BUT IM A SONY FAN BOY AT HEART...

P.S. WE NEED TO COMPETE WITH XBOX LIVE...AND SHUT UP ALL THOSE XBOX FAN BOYS MOUTH ONCE AND FOR ALL...CKUZ EVERY1 ONE KNOWS THAT XBOX LIVE IS THE ONLY REASON IT STILL EXIST(aDMITTED YOU XBOX LOVERS YOU KNOW ITS TRUE,WE HAVE WAY BETTER CONTENT)...WE DID IT TO DREAMCAST AND WE CAN DO IT TO YOU TOO...:twisted: GO SONY!!!

-NOXiK_AOPK-

What the heck are you talking about..??? The PSN is fine, the quality wasn't all that great at the beginning but now it's up to speed with XBL(I use both)

Avatar image for brummydude
brummydude

298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 brummydude
Member since 2007 • 298 Posts
Forget that. Free is best. Its fine the way it is. and firmware 3.10 will have cross game chat. what the hell else do you want. XBL should be a pay as you play service. not a subscription. I might still have it if it was
Avatar image for kweeni
kweeni

11413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#19 kweeni
Member since 2007 • 11413 Posts
hell no! free psn is one of the reasons why i prefer ps3 over x360
Avatar image for SadPSPAddict
SadPSPAddict

5462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

#20 SadPSPAddict
Member since 2006 • 5462 Posts

Hell that's a big no. I use both (PSN a lot more though) and the interface is so much better for browsing. On-line play nothing to choose between them so Sony have got it right!

Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#21 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts
No thanks. I like my free psn.
Avatar image for larsmet
larsmet

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 larsmet
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts
Unless they make it a lot better (like xbox live is) then, I wouldn't mind paying a few bucks per year (45$?). For that they would have to change many things because the interface, simply put, bad.
Avatar image for ArchoNils2
ArchoNils2

10534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 ArchoNils2
Member since 2005 • 10534 Posts

I personally think it would be best to leave the actual PSN as it is, but they could create something similar to the gold of ms by having a opportunity to dl from faster servers by shopping in the PS Store or by having some downloads earlier and/or cheaper (somehow what they did with quore, but to extend that idea over the whole account)

Avatar image for jd-gamer
jd-gamer

247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 jd-gamer
Member since 2007 • 247 Posts

No.

Avatar image for WEAPON_X_RECON
WEAPON_X_RECON

232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 WEAPON_X_RECON
Member since 2009 • 232 Posts

Unless they make it a lot better (like xbox live is) then, I wouldn't mind paying a few bucks per year (45$?). For that they would have to change many things because the interface, simply put, bad.larsmet

Other then in game chat,what actually does LIVE offer that is better??(I use both)

Avatar image for Furi-Kun
Furi-Kun

10903

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Furi-Kun
Member since 2007 • 10903 Posts

PSN should cost $200.00 a year. Then people will buy PS3s like hot cakes and chicken wings.

Avatar image for Mutt523
Mutt523

3805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#27 Mutt523
Member since 2008 • 3805 Posts

PSN should cost $200.00 a year. Then people will buy PS3s like hot cakes and chicken wings.

Furi-Kun
Furi stop drinking and posting at the same time.
Avatar image for Doomtime
Doomtime

4282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Doomtime
Member since 2004 • 4282 Posts
To me, the fact that its free means people shouldn't be complaining. A free service that is comparable to Xbox Live? Why the complaints? Take what they give us and be gracious. As far as PSN costing money, I hope they don't ever charge.
Avatar image for deactivated-58319077a6477
deactivated-58319077a6477

4954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 deactivated-58319077a6477
Member since 2007 • 4954 Posts
No it should stay the it is.
Avatar image for Zathic
Zathic

1946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -2

User Lists: 0

#30 Zathic
Member since 2007 • 1946 Posts

No, that's the reason I like the PS3 more.

Avatar image for thelastguy
thelastguy

12030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 thelastguy
Member since 2007 • 12030 Posts

No way

Avatar image for GingerDeadMan
GingerDeadMan

807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 GingerDeadMan
Member since 2009 • 807 Posts

Is this a troll job? I wouldn't even bother with PSN if it wasn't free. It's very hit-or-miss. I try not to complain about it due to the fact that it's free. I enjoy my uses out of it but most of my online game experiences are noticeably different than a PC game. I haven't played much 360 online to compare/contrast but seeing as how they actually pay for Live, it SHOULD be better. PSN is good considering it is free but some of the micro-transations are downright scams. ($5.99 for 4 miniature MGS figures in LBP, are you serious?)...

Avatar image for MarcRecon
MarcRecon

8191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 4

#33 MarcRecon
Member since 2009 • 8191 Posts

PSN should cost $200.00 a year. Then people will buy PS3s like hot cakes and chicken wings.

Furi-Kun

:|...furi

Avatar image for G-Legend
G-Legend

7387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#34 G-Legend
Member since 2005 • 7387 Posts

Why do people think that the money makes the better service? PSN is almost as good as XBL and it's free, Sony just needs to incorporate a few more things and then it will be on par. The reason you pay for XBL is because M$ runs it's own servers so it needs the money, which is why they have game invites in all their games, but that will probably be the only thing M$ has an upper hand on Sony in because if Sony comes out with cross-game chat and voice messaging, it will be equal to M$ party system.

Avatar image for Swift_Boss_A
Swift_Boss_A

14579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Swift_Boss_A
Member since 2007 • 14579 Posts

I can play games online on PSN with hardly any problems, I don't think it should cost. I'm sure Sony is making plenty money from the PS store(s) purchases. PSN may lack some features compared to it's competitors but the online play is great and on par as far as Im concerned, I don't mind waiting for those extra perks to come and it's not something that I really give a damn about to tell you the truth.

Avatar image for Jackc8
Jackc8

8515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#36 Jackc8
Member since 2007 • 8515 Posts

Online games work just fine, you've got a nice store where you can get PS1 classics, downloadable games, and free demo's - that's all I want. And it's free! There's no way I'd want to pay so they could add a tiny bit of crap that I have no interest in whatsoever.

Does the $50 / year system have a web browser?

Avatar image for whitetiger3521
whitetiger3521

4686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#37 whitetiger3521
Member since 2005 • 4686 Posts

No PSN is fine the way it is.. If you wanna pay go buy a Qore membership

Avatar image for nelson415
nelson415

1807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#38 nelson415
Member since 2007 • 1807 Posts

NO! i dont care about those features xbox has, as long as i can play online and play with friends its good.

Avatar image for Yazu13
Yazu13

5185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 88

User Lists: 0

#39 Yazu13
Member since 2005 • 5185 Posts

PSN is perfect the way it is. I'd rather have Sony's online services be free than be aesthetically pleasing.

Avatar image for yungswift44
yungswift44

1614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#40 yungswift44
Member since 2003 • 1614 Posts

your intitled to your opinion, and i respect your thought....but that was dumb

Avatar image for Bubble_Man
Bubble_Man

3100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#41 Bubble_Man
Member since 2006 • 3100 Posts

Like others have predictably answered, I say no. I can already play online and instantly join a game by accepting an invitation. NOT having to pay a fee just to play online is one of the perks of owninga PS3.

Avatar image for warmaster670
warmaster670

4699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 warmaster670
Member since 2004 • 4699 Posts

Did you just say you wanted to pay money for ads and themes? I vote no.white_sox

Its amazing how MS has brainwashed people into WANTING to give companies money for no reason.

Avatar image for supa_badman
supa_badman

16714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#43 supa_badman
Member since 2008 • 16714 Posts

Free online is one big reason why I chose ps3 over 360. :|

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#44 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25931 Posts
The ability to play online should ALWAYS be free. But if they offered some kind of premium option with more features (PSN Gold, or something like that) and charged $30 a year, that would be OK.
Avatar image for jcopp72
jcopp72

5375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#45 jcopp72
Member since 2007 • 5375 Posts
if they would start charging for it i would not use PSN anymore
Avatar image for Silent-Hal
Silent-Hal

9795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#46 Silent-Hal
Member since 2007 • 9795 Posts
I don't care how much they'd improve it, the day I pay for online gaming is the day Hell freezes over.
Avatar image for spawnassasin
spawnassasin

18702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 spawnassasin
Member since 2006 • 18702 Posts

no way

Avatar image for StealthMonkey4
StealthMonkey4

7434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#48 StealthMonkey4
Member since 2009 • 7434 Posts
From a gamer's perspective: No. From Sony's perspective: Yes. MS makes millions off of Gold subscriptions, if Sony charged even just about $20 a year, they'd make a lot of profit.
Avatar image for StealthMonkey4
StealthMonkey4

7434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#49 StealthMonkey4
Member since 2009 • 7434 Posts
From a gamer's perspective: No. From Sony's perspective: Yes. MS makes millions from Gold subscriptions, if Sony just charged about $20 a year they'd make a lot of profit.
Avatar image for paperdollparade
paperdollparade

1915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 paperdollparade
Member since 2007 • 1915 Posts

no no it should not and I will never understrand why people want to pay for something that is already free.