MAG- Predict the reivew!

I have to agree with Baller72,

They will most likely compare it to COD MW1-2.

I think they will give it a 6-7.

And they would probably say "you're better off getting MW2"

Gamespot reviews these days are going down hill.

Bad Company 2 with the mind blowing environmental destruction2Chalupas

From the BETA, I would assume a 6.5-7.0. The game is GOOD, not GREAT. a full out massive war is fun in all but it's more restrictive then I first imagined it to be. For one thing, most of the vehicles are not drivable and cannot be strategically placed. The customization and unlockables do give a sense of re-playability but I don't think the gameplay has much going for it. [QUOTE="2Chalupas"]Bad Company 2 with the mind blowing environmental destructionRhen_Var

I never played those games. I've played Bad Company 1 plenty, and the ability to destroy buildings adds a huge element missing in Modern Warfare 2. I'm referring to the MULTIPLAYER compared to MAG and MW2, and the gameplay element that environmental destruction brings there. I thoroughly enjoyed the ability to blow the %%@ out of the building clusters along with anyone camping inside it in the first Battlefield: Bad Company. No place to hide for campers on a wide open battlefield when going up against mortar strikes, airstrikes, tank attacks, etc.

I only played the PS3 beta for Bad Company 2, which didn't really include everything. But it was enough to know how great this game is going to be. It looks like it's just carrying forward Bad Company 1 and making it look like they've been polishing it for the last 3 years with a bunch of new maps (and 64 players on PC). Basically every wall of every building can be reduced to rubble, and every inch of dirt can be made to look like moon craters via artillary strikes. What more would you want in terms of "environmental destruction"?

I can see anywhere from 7.0 - 8.5, it looks like a great game, people have such a skewed way of looking at games, like only 8's and 9's count, that's a bad way to look at games... there needs to be a middle ground, how else are we to differentiate between abysmal, good, average, mediocre, elite, etc. Just because a 5 or a 6 isn't amazing, doesn't mean it's a 1 or a 2.

7.0 or 7.5... From the beta/demo I didn't think it was a very mind blowing game. The obvious big thing about this game is playing 128 vs. 128 on Domination but the game overall feels very generic to me.

sadly a 7.5

7.5 or 8 I think after the public beta there was a lot of people that decided to not be so excited for it because well just cause its exclusive doesn't mean it will be great. Me being one of them. :P

this is a hard one to predict, I had a great time playing the beta, but yeah the game fells kind of generic and yes they sacrificed the graphics a little so they could handle all the 256 player affair smoothly, but they're not bad at all and like I said I had fun playing it and I guess that that's what's important,

though I think they could have handled that shadow war thing a little better, as of now I didn't noticed much difference beetween being on the winning or loosing sides...

more vehicles would've been nice too, given some of the maps are huge and it's a pain in the ass to have to run for 3-5 minutes(depending on the situation) to get to where the action is, transport helis would have been awesome.

I think it'll get beetween 7 and 8, 8.5 tops.

5.5-60....it looks horrible

5.5-60....it looks horrible

jsmoke03

anywhere in between 7.5-8.5

7.0. Maybe 7.5 since it's an exclusive.

7.0-8.0

7

Probably an 8, but if comparisons to games like Battlefield and COD:MW are made, then it will be judged less on its own merits and more on how it "doesn't stack up". If that happens, 7.5-6.5.

Even so, I already preordered this game, and it looks great.

I say 7 or 8 at best...

I honestly think that it will get an 8, but at the moment the graphics arent looking that good...but thats just me and i hope i am wrong...

7.5

i say 7.5 but it could get an 8.0 or 8.5 but thats the highest

i actually think it will score a 9 here...

[QUOTE="baller72"]

See what I mean already people are already talking about Call of duty and comparing it.

lge777

??? And CoD and KZ are the 2 best shooters out,why wouldn't you want/DEMAND something better if you are going to spend you hard earned money on it.

Mag just isn't in the same ballpark as CoD or KZ2

It should get 2.5

[QUOTE="lge777"]

[QUOTE="baller72"]

See what I mean already people are already talking about Call of duty and comparing it.

shadowkiller11

??? And CoD and KZ are the 2 best shooters out,why wouldn't you want/DEMAND something better if you are going to spend you hard earned money on it.

Mag just isn't in the same ballpark as CoD or KZ2

But COD is one of the best shooters out, most people would agree

[QUOTE="shadowkiller11"][QUOTE="lge777"]

??? And CoD and KZ are the 2 best shooters out,why wouldn't you want/DEMAND something better if you are going to spend you hard earned money on it.

Mag just isn't in the same ballpark as CoD or KZ2

M0wen10

But COD is one of the best shooters out, most people would agree

7.0 on IGN, I can't guess Gamespot.NotAFurry

• 7.0 if there'sminimal technical/server problems at launch
• 6.0 if there's major technical/server problems at launch

I liked the game , but don't think it will get strong reviews based on its pricepoint vesus content. I hope it pulls a 7.0 at least and there's no major technical issues at launch.

[QUOTE="NotAFurry"]7.0 on IGN, I can't guess Gamespot.uRan_Ehr

7.5 but i'm buying regardless and i havent even played the beta.....I like the concept, though the trick is in the execution. Should be interesting to see what the devs make out of the premise. Its got a lot of potential imo and the public reception to the game should also be interesting.

6.5-7 with lack of SP but it may be worth a purchase if the price drops quickly.

8.6/10