[QUOTE="baller72"]
See what I mean already people are already talking about Call of duty and comparing it.
lge777
??? And CoD and KZ are the 2 best shooters out,why wouldn't you want/DEMAND something better if you are going to spend you hard earned money on it.
Mag just isn't in the same ballpark as CoD or KZ2
I can agree on the front of graphics yea it is no where near in that department, however I feel that is not what they were going for. I think they were really trying to give the player more responsibility when it came to the battlefield. MAG has great team play mechanics that I feel are second to know out right now.I love Call of Duty and Killzone, but I feel those are just games party games. Sure there are objectives in those games, but it does not have the same feel.
put it like this... as far as fun factor go I have them both equal. Just one game is an Arcade shooter while the other is a tactical shooter. However, majority of people do not like tactical shooters and will downplay them and call it garbage other than trying to learn how to play.
I just feel people will not give the game a chance due to Call oof Duty being out and Call of Duty is a lot more easy to pick up and play instead of MAG. Since MAG has a pretty big learning curve.
Prime example my friend had huge beef with how you throw a grenade in MAG, which is you have to actually switch to the grenade and then throw it. Unlike COD. I told him man that is a lot more realistic and tactiful. imagine you being in a battle. Do you just always just have a grenade in your hand ready to go? I think not.
Log in to comment