This topic is locked from further discussion.
Won't happen.
Unless Bill Gates and Kaz Hirai gets into bed together.
SSJBen
well idk they would potentially have to buy out epic to keep them from putting it on ps3 which is a likely buy out
After playing resistance , i laugh at the puny 8 player multiplayer of GOW.
But who cares about GOW 3, we got resistance 2 or 3 possibly by then.
Althought i might try GOW 2 that is looking good, as long as it has at least 16+ multiplayer im fine
After playing resistance , i laugh at the puny 8 player multiplayer of GOW.
But who cares about GOW 3, we got resistance 2 or 3 possibly by then.
Althought i might try GOW 2 that is looking good, as long as it has at least 16+ multiplayer im fine
The_Dude_Sam
well i did hear that there would be 16 player multiplayer but it doesnt really matter its elimation once dead always dead
so i only read the first post and here is my magnificent 2 cents. DONT CARE! gears is a highly overratted game based on awesome graphics, crappy game mechanics, and a gore based gimmicks! i can also name about a dozen game in this year alone (shooters only of course) that would be tons more fun and better to have on aspects of graphics, gameplay, online play, quality, innovation, box art, booklet thickness, and every other stupid thing i cant think of right now!
so, yeah...how about we see some good games instead...oh wait we will, cuz we own a ps3.
note: not a fanboy but honestly gears and halo are 2 games that just bring me to a brink of total anger due to the level of overrattedness (not sure if this is a word, but u get the point)!
so i only read the first post and here is my magnificent 2 cents. DONT CARE! gears is a highly overratted game based on awesome graphics, crappy game mechanics, and a gore based gimmicks! i can also name about a dozen game in this year alone (shooters only of course) that would be tons more fun and better to have on aspects of graphics, gameplay, online play, quality, innovation, box art, booklet thickness, and every other stupid thing i cant think of right now!
so, yeah...how about we see some good games instead...oh wait we will, cuz we own a ps3.
note: not a fanboy but honestly gears and halo are 2 games that just bring me to a brink of total anger due to the level of overrattedness (not sure if this is a word, but u get the point)!
haesuse
very well put i liked gears not gonna lie just cause of the online and halo is way overated just the online rankings made halo, halo
I was reading an article about Gears 2 and it said it was sadly exclusive to 360 which everyone knows but they said microsoft only had the rights over gears 1 and 2 so gears 3 if there is one will probably end up on ps3 PhAnToM_LeGeIVd
this is absolutely ...... POINTLESS. Just go and buy a 360 man.
It won't happen.
Inb4 LOL OVERRATED POS.
Seriously, if tomorrow Gears 2 for PS3 was announced, everyone would stop with the "overrated" stuff and start crapping their pants.
Gears of War is overated, just like Halo. If it was a game in an entirely different genre then I'd be excited about it. But it's just another shooter. It doesn't offer anything new.
Killzone 2 will be the best shooter out of them all.
rdsnuke
Why's that? whats so special about Killzone or Resistance that don't make them just another overrated shooter, which I am sure there are many to attest to that claim. anyway maybe if Sony sells 300 PS3' to every 1 360 then the game has a chance at going multiplat.
Like any multiplatform game the quality will instantly diminish the second it's no longer exclusive. Unless it's a timed exclusive (which is highly doubtful) where development can be focused completely on one platform at a time. newgames128
GTA ? hell even Gears is NOT exclusive.
[QUOTE="rdsnuke"]Gears of War is overated, just like Halo. If it was a game in an entirely different genre then I'd be excited about it. But it's just another shooter. It doesn't offer anything new.
Killzone 2 will be the best shooter out of them all.
Sepewrath
Why's that? whats so special about Killzone or Resistance that don't make them just another overrated shooter, which I am sure there are many to attest to that claim. anyway maybe if Sony sells 300 PS3' to every 1 360 then the game has a chance at going multiplat.
There's no such thing as an "overrated" game, because its all an opinion.this is a bit off topic but, Halo sucks compared to gears. Box-Heads should really use gears more when referring to the best games on their console. Halo 3 sucks. the end. oh and ps3 will never see gears. I wish it would, but it won't.---Saint---I'm sure there are people who own xboxs that think that MGS4 is horribly "overrated" too. It's all a matter of opinion.
I was reading an article about Gears 2 and it said it was sadly exclusive to 360 which everyone knows but they said microsoft only had the rights over gears 1 and 2 so gears 3 if there is one will probably end up on ps3 PhAnToM_LeGeIVd
It's VERY possible. For one MS doesn't own the franchise - they just have the rights to the first two installments as you pointed out.
More importantly if you read the article on the main page of GS in reference to the possible purchase of Epic games - well that would be huge. Right now that's not for sure - but if Epic Sells then it will be no holds bar and anything can happen.
:)
After playing resistance , i laugh at the puny 8 player multiplayer of GOW.
But who cares about GOW 3, we got resistance 2 or 3 possibly by then.
Althought i might try GOW 2 that is looking good, as long as it has at least 16+ multiplayer im fine
The_Dude_Sam
then you will be disappointed because it will have 8 player just like the first..... i would take gears 8 player multiplayer over resistance any day. resistance = clunky guns and horrible aiming... gears = tactical gameplay and percise controls...
[QUOTE="The_Dude_Sam"]After playing resistance , i laugh at the puny 8 player multiplayer of GOW.
But who cares about GOW 3, we got resistance 2 or 3 possibly by then.
Althought i might try GOW 2 that is looking good, as long as it has at least 16+ multiplayer im fine
Roland123_basic
then you will be disappointed because it will have 8 player just like the first..... i would take gears 8 player multiplayer over resistance any day. resistance = clunky guns and horrible aiming... gears = tactical gameplay and percise controls...
It's actually 10 people.I guess when people complain about that, they don't realize that Gears would suck with a lot of people. It would be possible, but it just wouldn't be fun, just like Resistance 2 wouldn't be fun with 10 people.
keeping my 360 just in case. And for all those saying gears is overrated, its not. Resistance is overrated.Altiar25
resistance 2 isent really being praised that much... so idk how it is overrated.. not comparing it to gears 2...
[QUOTE="Altiar25"]keeping my 360 just in case. And for all those saying gears is overrated, its not. Resistance is overrated.polishkid99
resistance 2 isent really being praised that much... so idk how it is overrated.. not comparing it to gears 2...
ive seen countless posts in these forums from the ps3 fanboys saying how Resistance 2 is gonna get a 10 and how its gonna be so awesome. honestly, from the beta, this game is pretty generic. its not bad, but certainly nothing about it is anything special. the competitive part of the beta was kinda bad. the AI is bad, especially the last big enemy u fight at the end. all it does is sit there, literally doesnt even move, while everyone just stands there and shoots at it. u might as well be standing there and shooting at a building or a tree. thats what it feels like.
Im not going to hide anything. I think gears of war is a good game and i wish the ps3 had a really good third person shooter like this with a good coop and good online. I hope we get gears 3 :)
josh_92
whyd you revive this thread? its from march
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment