What is your favorite music player on your computer?

I am still using iTunes (on Windows), mostly because I got resources to kill and I have been using it forever. I am rather curious what everyone is using.

iTunes. I got a Hexacore, 8gb ddr3 I can afford to 'waste resources'.

I just like the layout, and I have an itouch.

*I just checked. My CPU usage goes up 2% and my ram goes up by 1% how is that unoptimized?

Itunes > apple lossless :) and windows media or wm classic on samples.

On Windows: foobar2000 --So fast!

On KDE: Amarok --Godly Interface!

On GNOME, I use Audacious, which is like foobar2000.

Itunes > apple lossless :) and windows media or wm classic on samples.

Bikouchu35

I just use iTunes. There's nothing huge wrong with it that I see.

And I've got some iPods. :p

Media Player. It does what I need it to do.

I've been using Windows Media Player forever.

[QUOTE="Bikouchu35"]

Itunes > apple lossless :) and windows media or wm classic on samples.

Fightingfan

flac and alac are the same, just that the former works with everything else and the latter only works on apple stuff, apple logic. The files retain the same bloated size which Im having trouble managing on the phone, sad. Wav is even higher which I believe is uncompress but in terms in sq that doesnt make difference at all compare to compressed lossless.

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]

[QUOTE="Bikouchu35"]

Itunes > apple lossless :) and windows media or wm classic on samples.

Bikouchu35

flac and alac are the same, just that the former works with everything else and the latter only works on apple stuff, apple logic. The files retain the same bloated size which Im having trouble managing on the phone, sad. Wav is even higher which I believe is uncompress but in terms in sq that doesnt make difference at all compare to compressed lossless.

I am still of the mindset from some years back that iTunes was a massive resource hog that did nothing but waste time. It has always worked well for me and I am still tethered to my iPod classic as Apple is the only one still making HDD mp3 players (hell, they are the only ones making quality mp3 players at all!).

I just use iTunes. I don't need some special hipster program.

Main issue here as well, can't load-up a cell phone with window's loseless file format(Name escapes me at this moment).Fightingfan

I sometimes question myself if Im an idiot if I stick around for the next iproduct when an android can play flac without the tedious chore of converting. My biggest jab is the lack of sd slot grr.

I use winamp right now cause it plays flac files.

I have Zune. It's a good media player imo, and it can stream music onto my 360.

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"] Main issue here as well, can't load-up a cell phone with window's loseless file format(Name escapes me at this moment).Bikouchu35

I sometimes question myself if Im an idiot if I stick around for the next iproduct when an android can play flac without the tedious chore of converting. My biggest jab is the lack of sd slot grr.

On Windows: foobar2000 --So fast!

On KDE: Amarok --Godly Interface!

On GNOME, I use Audacious, which is like foobar2000.

Blade8Aus

foobar

I am still of the mindset from some years back that iTunes was a massive resource hog that did nothing but waste time. It has always worked well for me and I am still tethered to my iPod classic as Apple is the only one still making HDD mp3 players (hell, they are the only ones making quality mp3 players at all!).

PEELEDbanana

Are there people here talking about music players being fast? I didn't know fastness was an issue with music players in the last ten years. You just click on the song and it plays. I guess Palantas is not an audiophile.

I just use iTunes. I don't need some special hipster program.

CHOASXIII

I have a Zune Pass, and use Zune for the same reason.

Winamp

iTunes because it's easy to sort my music the way I want it, find music easily and because I have an iPod.

That being said, I have been using Winamp occasionally because it's not such a resource hog, but I cannot be bothered updating both media players whenever I get a new album, so I just stick to iTunes.

on my windows desktop i use windows media player. very lightwight program with a wonderful UI. especially with Win7.

on my macbook i use iTunes. iTunes is lame as hell on windows, but runs fantastically on my mac for obvious reasons. i like the UI for it a lot too.

iTunes because I HAD and iPod until I lost it.

I use Windows Media Player. It's a piece of crap that takes forever to load, but I almost never listen to music on my computer anyway.

Windows media player or itunes.

Windows Media Player for music.

VLC for videos.

I've been using Windows Media Player forever.

soulless4now

This.

I only use my phone to listen to music. Otherwise I'll just listen to my playlists on YouTube.

[QUOTE="PEELEDbanana"]

I am still of the mindset from some years back that iTunes was a massive resource hog that did nothing but waste time. It has always worked well for me and I am still tethered to my iPod classic as Apple is the only one still making HDD mp3 players (hell, they are the only ones making quality mp3 players at all!).

DJ_Headshot

Winamp

I love to put Milkdrop visualizations in desktop mode.

ive been using vlc a lot lately.

i have itunes but i only use it for syncing with my ipod.