What car do you drive?!

I myself have a 1998 1.8 petrolHonda Integra Type-R:P

1990 ford escort :P still runs like a champ though...

1991 saab 900 S, great old car, almost 250,000miles and still going strong

1999 Pontiac grand Am GT. Yes a GT, it's a real racecar :P

Mountain Bike.

It's got great fuel efficiency.

Vauxhall Corsa. Crap.Big_Bad_Sad

My baby... 1985 Toyota MR2:

Acura 3.2 TL S-Type

2001 Chevy Impala.

i drive a one of these babies...

No car. Main means of transportation: BMX Bike.

My baby... 1985 Toyota MR2:

2004 F-150 lightning

2009 Nissan Altima

A lame '93 Saturn. I want a new car. :(

A hideously unremarkably 1997 Ford Taurus. On the plus side, it's much bigger inside than today's compact cars, has sold a ridiculous number of cars so parts are easy to find and cheap, and other than the transmission has one of the most reliable engines in history. Not very fuel efficient, though - but then again, you wouldn't expect a 3L V6 to be efficient even if it only puts out ~160hp (seriously, how did they manage that few horsepower from that volume). It's also visually bland and undesirable, which means I don't have to worry about anyone stealing it or keying it. And it only cost me $1200 a few years back. So I can deal with it being what it is.DJ_Lae

That seems to be a huge problem with American cars with BHP. They always have ridiculously massive engines and squeeze barely no horsepower out of it which is very strange. Your average V6 should be putting out at least 250BHP Thats an extra 100 plus with a good service you could gain back more horses;)gibson-les-rick

2007 Nissan 350z Touring. 6-speed manual, Leather, Bose stereo. I'm very fortunate to have my "realistic" dream car already. My ultimate dream car is an Aston Martin V12 Vantage.

[QUOTE="gibson-les-rick"]That seems to be a huge problem with American cars with BHP. They always have ridiculously massive engines and squeeze barely no horsepower out of it which is very strange. Your average V6 should be putting out at least 250BHP Thats an extra 100 plus with a good service you could gain back more horses;)DJ_Lae

I don't own my own car so I drive my parents.

[QUOTE="DJ_Lae"][QUOTE="gibson-les-rick"]That seems to be a huge problem with American cars with BHP. They always have ridiculously massive engines and squeeze barely no horsepower out of it which is very strange. Your average V6 should be putting out at least 250BHP Thats an extra 100 plus with a good service you could gain back more horses;)gibson-les-rick

Honda has always made some of the most impressive engines in terms of power per displacement. The original S2000 was 2.0 liters and made 240hp. Compare that to a 1995 Ford Mustang V6- 3.8 liter making 140-145hp. WTF?!! My 3.5 liter V6 makes 306 hp.

2001 Pontiac Grand Prix GT

[QUOTE="gibson-les-rick"]

Yeah, it is ridiculous. About the only good thing I can say about the engine is that it's not loud, and has a lot more torque than a similarly sized four cylinder - 180lb/ft, I think. And for city driving that's a nicer thing to have, especially at low rpm.DJ_Lae

Honda has always made some of the most impressive engines in terms of power per displacement. The original S2000 was 2.0 liters and made 240hp. Compare that to a 1995 Ford Mustang V6- 3.8 liter making 140-145hp. WTF?!! My 3.5 liter V6 makes 306 hp.

Honda has always made some of the most impressive engines in terms of power per displacement. The original S2000 was 2.0 liters and made 240hp. Compare that to a 1995 Ford Mustang V6- 3.8 liter making 140-145hp. WTF?!! My 3.5 liter V6 makes 306 hp.

hartsickdiscipl

i drive a one of these babies...

hiphopballer

Honda has always made some of the most impressive engines in terms of power per displacement. The original S2000 was 2.0 liters and made 240hp. Compare that to a 1995 Ford Mustang V6- 3.8 liter making 140-145hp. WTF?!! My 3.5 liter V6 makes 306 hp.

I drive a 1995 Camaro z28.

My love...

1992 Mitsubishi Evo I

'02 acura rsx type-s

Nissan Frontier.

This is a picture of my baby. His name is Tito. :)

[QUOTE="gibson-les-rick"] Just a comparison I had my Integra dyno tested recently and it produced 193BHP and its only a 1.8, gotta love japanese cars! Also it ''was'' my dream car but I would love aBMW 5 series

Honda has always made some of the most impressive engines in terms of power per displacement. The original S2000 was 2.0 liters and made 240hp. Compare that to a 1995 Ford Mustang V6- 3.8 liter making 140-145hp. WTF?!! My 3.5 liter V6 makes 306 hp.

Honda Accord 02

2006 Chrysler 300C, with the 340 HP Hemi V-8.

A smoker performance-wise, but switches to 4-cylinders for fuel economy when cruising.

i drive a PT cruiser.

My 1999 Dodge Dakota, got it with 31xxx miles on it and now its got about 36xxx

[QUOTE="gibson-les-rick"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

Honda has always made some of the most impressive engines in terms of power per displacement. The original S2000 was 2.0 liters and made 240hp. Compare that to a 1995 Ford Mustang V6- 3.8 liter making 140-145hp. WTF?!! My 3.5 liter V6 makes 306 hp.

WWIAB

I can't deny that there was a serious squeeze on power during the smog era due to emissions regulations. However, Ford was notorious until very recent years for the low specific outputs of their engines. Even a 2007 Mustang V6 with a 4.0 liter V6 makes 210hp. My 3.5 liter v6 makes 306hp under the same emissions standards. It doesn't have v8 torque, but 268 lb-ft ain't shabby.

2004 Subaru WRX. It's a fun little car to have! Here's me tearing it up down on the Texas shore in Corpus Crusty.

1997 BMW 318i

2010 S 600