[QUOTE="Katafran"][QUOTE="Nwordjohn"] I think the real point that this thread is missing isn't about who would win, but should it even happen? War is good for nothing, it only leads to future conflicts, that the veterans of past wars don't even fight. While Iran may be trying to get nuclear materials, they do allow the IAEA into their country for inspections frequently and all is within boundaries of the law.
Therefore the real arguement is, are you prepared for another war under false pretenses? The blood of all of those innocent civilians falls on the hands of the U.S citizens. How? You elect your representatives and it is up to you to keep them in line, no one else can. By allowing them to do this you are just as guilty as they are. Just remember, the media only portrays what they are told to. Can you really trust them?
Nwordjohn
Everyone knows that war is terrible. That's a very easy arguement to make. The point is that our allies are not safe so long as Iran waves their weapons and keeps enriching uranium past what's necessary for nuclear power.
You do realize according to your country's own NIE report that Iran is at least another 10 years away from making any type of nuclear weapon? Not to mention most of the agression so far has been America and Israel flexing military muscle. Lets not forget a year ago when America started making up reasons for aggression against Iran.
It was along the lines of:
"Iran is causing the insurgency"
"IEDs are being sent from Iran to Iraq"
When that failed they started talking about WMDs. You know... just like they did with Iraq. They put the fear into you so you'll buy into their wars. Iran is peaceful. Its the U.S and Israel that are the real aggressors, but whereas they own the corporate media they will never be shown in that light.
Actually Iran actually DID send insurgents in, or at least allowed insurgents to fight in Iraq. I certainly wouldnt be surprised if they supplied them, it's not unheard of.
Funny thing, Do you think that Iran would really flaunt the world to such a degree if they REALLY weren't aiming for nuclear weapons? If you do, that is damn naive.
Would you have us wait 10 years until they are right on top of having one?
You sound like the type of person that protests at military funerals. That bad intelligence about WMD's was gotten from European intelligence agencies and seemed legit at the time, hindsight is a **** Bush jumped the gun, but he most likely didn't mean it as a lie.
There has been NO overt aggression on the US part in Iran, compared to Iran breaking known international laws and harassing US warships.
Both sides have been just as inflammatory with their rhetoric, though US hasnt vowed to wipe out Iran, while they HAVE vowed to wipe out Israel.
When someone states they will kill you, it is a good idea to take them seriously.
Log in to comment