Intriguing.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="comp_atkins"]lol no.. Yes...in several ways the recession of the early 80s was worse than the one we just had. Recovery was far greater and there was little government intervention. Little government intervention = massive contractionary and expansionary monetary policy?[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]So you think all that random government spending and 'stimulus' actually did something? We've had similar recessions, like in the early 80s, and recovered far faster because government wasn't such a huge percentage of the economy.KC_Hokie
like talking to a wall.. so what about private sector jobs supported, maybe not even fully, by government funds? When those jobs are propped up by borrowed and printed money then that's a bad thing. That's why GDP dropped last quarter....defense spending dropped.[QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Doesn't really matter. 100% of it is borrowed, printed or taxed. All three take away from the private sector and finite resources of the economy. KC_Hokie
It's good that government spending dropped. Terrible it was such a high percentage of the economy in the first place.
which brings us full circle to the original point i made about not all government supported jobs are funded by borrowed/printed money... there aren't solid brick walls in the economy between what is government-funded and privately-funded... it's all interconnected. to simply say "we should just eliminate all jobs funded by borrowed/printed money" is a ridiculous statement to make because it shows a glaring lack of understanding of the complexities of our economy.[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]When those jobs are propped up by borrowed and printed money then that's a bad thing. That's why GDP dropped last quarter....defense spending dropped.[QUOTE="comp_atkins"] like talking to a wall.. so what about private sector jobs supported, maybe not even fully, by government funds? comp_atkins
It's good that government spending dropped. Terrible it was such a high percentage of the economy in the first place.
which brings us full circle to the original point i made about not all government supported jobs are funded by borrowed/printed money... there aren't solid brick walls in the economy between what is government-funded and privately-funded... it's all interconnected. to simply say "we should just eliminate all jobs funded by borrowed/printed money" is a ridiculous statement to make because it shows a glaring lack of understanding of the complexities of our economy.Subtlety has no place in an OT discussion, especially with those who only attack and ignore contradictory information, however well it's supported.
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"] lol no.. -Sun_Tzu-Yes...in several ways the recession of the early 80s was worse than the one we just had. Recovery was far greater and there was little government intervention. Little government intervention = massive contractionary and expansionary monetary policy? That recession was a correction to the prior recession.
We're going to have a significant correction to the one we just had too.
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]When those jobs are propped up by borrowed and printed money then that's a bad thing. That's why GDP dropped last quarter....defense spending dropped.[QUOTE="comp_atkins"] like talking to a wall.. so what about private sector jobs supported, maybe not even fully, by government funds? comp_atkins
It's good that government spending dropped. Terrible it was such a high percentage of the economy in the first place.
which brings us full circle to the original point i made about not all government supported jobs are funded by borrowed/printed money... there aren't solid brick walls in the economy between what is government-funded and privately-funded... it's all interconnected. to simply say "we should just eliminate all jobs funded by borrowed/printed money" is a ridiculous statement to make because it shows a glaring lack of understanding of the complexities of our economy. Saying there isn't a difference between the private and public sectors is socialism and a huge problem.Little government intervention = massive contractionary and expansionary monetary policy? That recession was a correction to the prior recession.[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"] Yes...in several ways the recession of the early 80s was worse than the one we just had. Recovery was far greater and there was little government intervention. KC_Hokie
We're going to have a significant correction to the one we just had too.
Hokie don't you think it's a little too soon to start making predictions again?[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]That recession was a correction to the prior recession.[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] Little government intervention = massive contractionary and expansionary monetary policy? -Sun_Tzu-
We're going to have a significant correction to the one we just had too.
Hokie don't you think it's a little too soon to start making predictions again? One more quarter like the last one and I'm right. This is a far easier prediction since the last few years of government spending, borrowing and printing are not sustainable.[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]That recession was a correction to the prior recession.Hokie don't you think it's a little too soon to start making predictions again? One more quarter like the last one and I'm right. This is a far easier prediction since the last few years of government spending, borrowing and printing are not sustainable. oh boy here we go againWe're going to have a significant correction to the one we just had too.
KC_Hokie
Why are liberals so emotional?DaBrainz
You didn't need to leave the other thread to say that. And there's very little emotion in this thread, just a debate, of sorts.
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]That recession was a correction to the prior recession.Hokie don't you think it's a little too soon to start making predictions again? One more quarter like the last one and I'm right. This is a far easier prediction since the last few years of government spending, borrowing and printing are not sustainable. It's ok Hokie, we'll just make it all magically disappear with trillion dollar coins LOLWe're going to have a significant correction to the one we just had too.
KC_Hokie
[QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]When those jobs are propped up by borrowed and printed money then that's a bad thing. That's why GDP dropped last quarter....defense spending dropped.which brings us full circle to the original point i made about not all government supported jobs are funded by borrowed/printed money... there aren't solid brick walls in the economy between what is government-funded and privately-funded... it's all interconnected. to simply say "we should just eliminate all jobs funded by borrowed/printed money" is a ridiculous statement to make because it shows a glaring lack of understanding of the complexities of our economy. Saying there isn't a difference between the private and public sectors is socialism and a huge problem. i never said there wasn't a difference... just that it isn't as black and white as you'd like to think. we live in the real world, after all. simply saying socialism = bad, capitalism = good and that being ( essentially ) your only argument may get you a bumper sticker made, but it will not address any real-world issues... in the real world we have both.It's good that government spending dropped. Terrible it was such a high percentage of the economy in the first place.
KC_Hokie
[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]Yea....it was the Department of Commerce that provided that data. And it was totally unexpected for the GDP to drop DURING the holiday quarter. Almost never happens. GDP is seasonally adjusted each quarter so the holiday sales aren't factored into it.For reference, since looking at a single data point is never much use.KC_Hokie
I think the press is blaming the superstorm Sandy. That way you can focus your rage on a non human thing.
Damn, Obama done messed up the economy again!
whipassmt
Four years of similar policies and now we have a single quarter that's bad. Yep, he's most likely to blame.
[QUOTE="whipassmt"]
Damn, Obama done messed up the economy again!
jimkabrhel
Four years of similar policies and now we have a single quarter that's bad. Yep, he's most likely to blame.
well it's his fault insofar as he can be blamed for not resisting spending cuts more than he did[QUOTE="-RocBoys9489-"]I lost faith in the US government long ago. Nobody is going to do anything to solve our debt CRISIS; not problem, CRISISAbbetenhow is it a crisis? Do you have any idea how much 16 trillion dollars is?
I'm at a lost for words on the minimal understanding of economic indicators in this thread. (GDP is a fine broad measure to use for how an economy is going, I have never seen GNP used in anything worth reading)
First, one quarter does not constitute a trend, especially with the volatility that we had in q4 (Sandy and the lead up to the fiscal "cliff" deal).
Also, the private sector did fairly well in 2012. The public sector (which, the TC thinks we should contract even more) was the drag on job growth in 2012.
Further, the EU is going through recession right now. So, the drop in exports the US is seeing is due significantly to that.......
[QUOTE="Abbeten"][QUOTE="-RocBoys9489-"]I lost faith in the US government long ago. Nobody is going to do anything to solve our debt CRISIS; not problem, CRISISDarkLink77how is it a crisis? Do you have any idea how much 16 trillion dollars is? Do you have any idea how low interest rates are?
[QUOTE="Abbeten"][QUOTE="-RocBoys9489-"]I lost faith in the US government long ago. Nobody is going to do anything to solve our debt CRISIS; not problem, CRISISDarkLink77how is it a crisis? Do you have any idea how much 16 trillion dollars is? yes. that doesn't answer my question.
[QUOTE="Abbeten"][QUOTE="-RocBoys9489-"]I lost faith in the US government long ago. Nobody is going to do anything to solve our debt CRISIS; not problem, CRISISDarkLink77how is it a crisis? Do you have any idea how much 16 trillion dollars is? We can borrow for basically nothing right now..... It needs to be addressed in the future (mainly long-term liabilities like social security and medicare). However, it is not an imminent threat to our economy.
[QUOTE="Abbeten"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Exactly what the Greeks said up until a few years ago. KC_Hokiegreeks don't issue bonds in their own sovereign currency bro~ also they had a little problem with tax evasion and their huge deficits being kept a secret from the public until they were accidentally revealedJapan issues their own bonds and currency and look at their situation. They keep throwing cash into their economy which causes perpetual recession. Yeah, look at their situation - no debt crisis.
[QUOTE="Abbeten"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Exactly what the Greeks said up until a few years ago. KC_Hokiegreeks don't issue bonds in their own sovereign currency bro~ also they had a little problem with tax evasion and their huge deficits being kept a secret from the public until they were accidentally revealedJapan issues their own bonds and currency and look at their situation. They keep throwing cash into their economy which causes perpetual recession. For 2010 GDP growth in Japan was 4.4%........ Far from a recession.
[QUOTE="Abbeten"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Exactly what the Greeks said up until a few years ago. KC_Hokiegreeks don't issue bonds in their own sovereign currency bro~ also they had a little problem with tax evasion and their huge deficits being kept a secret from the public until they were accidentally revealedJapan issues their own bonds and currency and look at their situation. They keep throwing cash into their economy which causes perpetual recession. interest rates on japanese bonds are also very low they're not having a debt crisis either
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Japan issues their own bonds and currency and look at their situation. They keep throwing cash into their economy which causes perpetual recession. KC_HokieYeah, look at their situation - no debt crisis. Their debt as a percentage of GDP is higher than ours. And ours is high. And yet they are still not Greece and there is still no Japanese debt crisis.
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Japan issues their own bonds and currency and look at their situation. They keep throwing cash into their economy which causes perpetual recession. KC_HokieYeah, look at their situation - no debt crisis. Their debt as a percentage of GDP is higher than ours. And ours is high. really? your definition of a debt crisis is simply high debt?
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] Yeah, look at their situation - no debt crisis. -Sun_Tzu-Their debt as a percentage of GDP is higher than ours. And ours is high. And yet they are still not Greece and there is still no Japanese debt crisis. It's hurt their economy for two decades. And yes their debt crisis is coming:
Faced with balancing aggressive spending plans on a mountain of debt, Japan's government said it would cut overall planned bond issuance in the coming fiscal year.
[QUOTE="Mafiree"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Exactly what the Greeks said up until a few years ago. KC_HokieSure.......It's exactly what they did.....government keep borrowing and spending money and let future generations pay for it. So, we should have austerity measures........and have the "future generations" pay for it now by being under/unemployed? Just, look how the austerity measures taken in Spain have affected the unemployment rate of those 18-25.......
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment