[QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="Weredawg"][QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"] [QUOTE="SIapshot"][QUOTE="Needles-Kane"]Yes, I am very thankful for them. I am also very thankful for the rest of Europe and the U.S. Without them, the entire world would be unmodernized, primative third world-like.Funky_Llama
So true... :)I don't see how you could predict how (today's) third-world countries would have advanced without Western oppression.
Africa, South America and the middle east showed no signs of progress whatsoever. And western influence is the only reason why nations such as China and India are able to compete in today's global economy.
Yes, let's completely ignore the contributions of, for example, Muslim matheticians, and the numerous inventions that China had centuries before the West.
I'm not talking about ancient inventions here. I'm talking about how the societies were developing around the time of western contact and influence.
Funky Lama has a point. Eastern culture has had an effect on Western and vice versa. And have you been to Africa, S. America or the Middle East? That you would say that those countries have shown no signs of progress just reveals your ignorance.
I suggest you read and understand what I'm trying to say before you type next time. Cheers...
But you're deliberatly excluding the example I gave. You said that their societies didn't advance at all. They did. You can't just say, 'No, I didn't mean that!'. Stop trying to wiggle out of it.
Hah, I'm not trying to wiggle out of anything. The mentioned regions' societal development had stagnated when the western powers reached them and, as I said before, showed no sign of progress. This leads me to believe that their societies wouldn't be nearly as developed if western nations had not reached them. A basic understanding of the European industrial revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries is especially significant when discussing this subject.
Log in to comment