So what do Democrats think about this pic?

JFK, a Democrat, believed in the Second Admendment. And look, he is holding a assault rifle. I believe he is correct and knew the true meaning of the Second Admendment. Obama is wrong in this attack on assault weapons.

Would you give a monkey a gun?AIIison

Yes but I wouldn't give them any bullets for it.

Are you going to fight the U.S army with pistols and rifles?GazaAli

He doesn't give much of an interpretation of the second amendment, he merely says what it is and says he thinks its important.chessmaster1989

[QUOTE="GazaAli"]Are you going to fight the U.S army with pistols and rifles?ristactionjakso

[QUOTE="thegerg"][QUOTE="AIIison"]JFK can do whatever he wants. We just do not want uneduacated hill billies and psychos with them.AIIison

You certainly aren't.

[QUOTE="ristactionjakso"]

[QUOTE="GazaAli"]Are you going to fight the U.S army with pistols and rifles?GazaAli

I love how the president hints at something that "might" happen and people are falling apart emotionally (don't take muh guns!). If nothing comes of all this hoopla, **** trolls will have nothing on the POTUS.

[QUOTE="GazaAli"][QUOTE="ristactionjakso"]Do you really think the army will stand against millions of armed people? Unless the government bombs itself, there is no way it can win.

ristactionjakso

Look at Libya and Syria. Those people are armed to the teeth (very easy to get assault weapons in arab countries) and yet those revolutions would fail without air support. Syria is moving at a ultra slow pace because of the lack of air power

should we be able to buy fighter jets?

Look at Libya and Syria. Those people are armed to the teeth (very easy to get assault weapons in arab countries) and yet those revolutions would fail without air support. Syria is moving at a ultra slow pace because of the lack of air power

BossPerson

[QUOTE="ristactionjakso"]

[QUOTE="GazaAli"] Your argument does not need armed civilians whatsoever. The Iranian revolution, the Tunisian revolution, the Egyptian revolution all proceeded without armed populations.GazaAli

Look at Libya and Syria. Those people are armed to the teeth (very easy to get assault weapons in arab countries) and yet those revolutions would fail without air support. Syria is moving at a ultra slow pace because of the lack of air power

should we be able to buy fighter jets?

BossPerson

[QUOTE="AIIison"][QUOTE="thegerg"] I don't think anyone wants psychos to have guns, but to disallow someone their rights simply because they're uneducated is quite elitist and, honestly, disgusting. (What is quite ironic is that you misspell the word "uneducated" in a post in which you are saying that those people are somehow lesser than you.)thegerg

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]

Look at Libya and Syria. Those people are armed to the teeth (very easy to get assault weapons in arab countries) and yet those revolutions would fail without air support. Syria is moving at a ultra slow pace because of the lack of air power

GazaAli

[QUOTE="GazaAli"][QUOTE="ristactionjakso"]Because they don't have the right to own firearms.

ristactionjakso

[QUOTE="thegerg"][QUOTE="AIIison"] Oh **** off Captain America. This thread is not about your morals? Some people are just smarter, learn the fact. Would you give a monkey a gun?ristactionjakso

You're one of the most rabid and blind hyperpartisans on this board. You really have no room to call anybody ignorant, especially when you you think Obama "cheated" to get re-elected.

[QUOTE="GazaAli"][QUOTE="BossPerson"]

Look at Libya and Syria. Those people are armed to the teeth (very easy to get assault weapons in arab countries) and yet those revolutions would fail without air support. Syria is moving at a ultra slow pace because of the lack of air power

BossPerson

[QUOTE="AIIison"][QUOTE="thegerg"] I don't think anyone wants psychos to have guns, but to disallow someone their rights simply because they're uneducated is quite elitist and, honestly, disgusting. (What is quite ironic is that you misspell the word "uneducated" in a post in which you are saying that those people are somehow lesser than you.)thegerg

[QUOTE="ristactionjakso"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] Yes, some people are smarter. That has nothing to do with the fact that you seem to wish to deny Americans their rights based on their level of education. Let's not forget that that was the same justification used to prevent blacks from voting in many places for generations. It's inhumane and disgusting. GreySeal9

You're one of the most rabid and blind hyperpartisans on this board. You really have no room to call anybody ignorant, especially when you you think Obama "cheated" to get re-elected.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="ristactionjakso"]Good point there. Most liberal democrats are ignorant to their own ingorance.

ristactionjakso

You're one of the most rabid and blind hyperpartisans on this board. You really have no room to call anybody ignorant, especially when you you think Obama "cheated" to get re-elected.

should we be able to buy fighter jets?BossPerson

I don't think democrats light candles in front of a JFK altar the way republicans do with Reagan.

I don't think democrats light candles in front of a JFK altar the way republicans do with Reagan.

LordQuorthon

I don't think democrats light candles in front of a JFK altar the way republicans do with Reagan.

LordQuorthon

Good point.

So you think that anyone who wants should have a weapon with no type of regulation what so ever? I'm calling your analogy false because denying voting rights wasn't truthfully based on intelligence tests (which we should have anyway, but that's another issue) but purely on the color of their skin. They are in no way, shape, or form connected or the same.

thats his opinion

The intelligence tests were used as a basis, but even if someone black passed the test, they'd still be denied based off of some other fabricated reason. If it was a legitimate test, I, nor any other black person would have had a problem with them.

I don't think democrats light candles in front of a JFK altar the way republicans do with Reagan.

LordQuorthon

Everytime I peek at this board there's always a gun thread.

Everytime I peek at this board there's always a gun thread.

Blue-Sky

ff there was no second amendment jfk would still be alive

My computer says that it's 2013, not 1960.

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]

A WELL REGULATED MILITIAA WELL REGULATED MILITIAA WELL REGULATED MILITIAA WELL REGULATED MILITIAA WELL REGULATED MILITIAA WELL REGULATED MILITIAA WELL REGULATED MILITIAA WELL REGULATED MILITIAA WELL REGULATED MILITIA

thegerg