Well, I guess that's that. No need for arguments or millions of dollars spent every year arguing for one point or the other, time to let it go. Thank you brave scientist for providing everyone with closure. Enjoy your Nobel prize. Peace out!
I've seen it before. It's real. Well, then I'm certainly stunned. lol at him wanting to get this published in any journal. How much you wanna bet that, when he fails, he'll blame the gay agenda?
I see a flaw in his analysis. He is correct. The north pole of a magnet attracts the south pole of a magnet but repels the north pole of another magnet. This is true. But MAGNETS are very strongly attracted to other MAGNETS. Magnets arent however attracted to plastic or cheese but to other magnets. Magnets only repel each other when the north side touches the other's north side. So if we extrapolate this to men, MEN are attracted to MEN but "Jimmy Johnsons" are not attracted to each other and arent meant to connect. Thats why gay men put their "Jimmy Johnson"(male north pole) in the other man's "Bongo Hole"(male south pole).
I can top that. In caveman times, bunga put his dong in jim, and nothing happened. He later put it in jill, and she had a baby. So the simple natural logic is being gay is pointless, so why would you? I am running with Rick Perry for 2016, thank you.
I see a flaw in his analysis. He is correct. The north pole of a magnet attracts the south pole of a magnet but repels the north pole of another magnet. This is true. But MAGNETS are very strongly attracted to other MAGNETS. Magnets arent however attracted to plastic or cheese but to other magnets. Magnets only repel each other when the north side touches the other's north side. So if we extrapolate this to men, MEN are attracted to MEN but "Jimmy Johnsons" are not attracted to each other and arent meant to connect. Thats why gay men put their "Jimmy Johnson"(male north pole) in the other man's "Bongo Hole"(male south pole).
He does realize people aren't magnets, right?PernicioEnigma
He is simply using laws of nature, theoretically speaking he is right (2 same objects should not attract each other) Ofc its a very biggoted and unnapropiate to apply it to people.
[QUOTE="PernicioEnigma"]He does realize people aren't magnets, right?lightleggy
He is simply using laws of nature, theoretically speaking he is right (2 same objects should not attract each other) Ofc its a very biggoted and unnapropiate to apply it to people. Not everything in nature operates the same way. To take the properties of magnets and apply them to human sexuality is about as far from scientific as you can get. Anyway, the title of the article says he's not simply applying the properties of magnets to human sexuality, but to gay MARRIAGE - a social construct! This just adds another layer of BS onto what is an already ridiculous theory. Just to clarify, I'm not saying gay marriage or homosexuality is good or bad, I'm simply pointing out this "theory" is absolute nonsense.
[QUOTE="lightleggy"][QUOTE="PernicioEnigma"]He does realize people aren't magnets, right?PernicioEnigma
He is simply using laws of nature, theoretically speaking he is right (2 same objects should not attract each other) Ofc its a very biggoted and unnapropiate to apply it to people. Not everything in nature operates the same way. To take the properties of magnets and apply them to human sexuality is about as far from scientific as you can get. Anyway, the title of the article says he's not simply applying the properties of magnets to human sexuality, but to gay MARRIAGE - a social construct! This just adds another layer of BS onto what is an already ridiculous theory. Just to clarify, I'm not saying gay marriage or homosexuality is good or bad, I'm simply pointing out this "theory" is absolute nonsense. He actually didn't just used magnets but math, physics and chemistry to show the same principle. I'm obviously not saying he is right, I'm saying that his "theory" has a foundation.
Why yes, yes he is. Some people and their ignorance of science. I curse the day that our hard working scientists have been out shown by people only wishing to believe completely irrelevant information to the experiment at hand. I for one stand with this poor scientist and the harassment that people want to send his way.
[QUOTE="lightleggy"]I'm obviously not saying he is right, I'm saying that his "theory" has a foundation.Pffrbt
It doesn't though because it has absolutely nothing to do with what he's talking about.
You sir are just jealous of his pure brilliance. In fact his science is so sound that it has shattered the space time continuum and has impacted past scientists like Einstein. The only reason Einstein got into science is because this universe shattering event changed the past in such as way that he was willing to take up the cause of science. While none of his theories even approach what a monumental and amazing accomplishment that what's his name who came up with this did, Einstein was still really important and without this theory of non-gay magnets we would not have him. Set and match.
I see a flaw in his analysis. He is correct. The north pole of a magnet attracts the south pole of a magnet but repels the north pole of another magnet. This is true. But MAGNETS are very strongly attracted to other MAGNETS. Magnets arent however attracted to plastic or cheese but to other magnets. Magnets only repel each other when the north side touches the other's north side. So if we extrapolate this to men, MEN are attracted to MEN but "Jimmy Johnsons" are not attracted to each other and arent meant to connect. Thats why gay men put their "Jimmy Johnson"(male north pole) in the other man's "Bongo Hole"(male south pole).
:lol: that made me lol. And I dont get why people care so much what 2 adults do in the privacy of their rooms. Even if they are holding hands in public...Your son/daughter isnt going to turn gay. If they come out later on its because they were already gay, u just didnt know it.
I see a flaw in his analysis. He is correct. The north pole of a magnet attracts the south pole of a magnet but repels the north pole of another magnet. This is true. But MAGNETS are very strongly attracted to other MAGNETS. Magnets arent however attracted to plastic or cheese but to other magnets. Magnets only repel each other when the north side touches the other's north side. So if we extrapolate this to men, MEN are attracted to MEN but "Jimmy Johnsons" are not attracted to each other and arent meant to connect. Thats why gay men put their "Jimmy Johnson"(male north pole) in the other man's "Bongo Hole"(male south pole).
Based on my research we should FORCE gay marrage.
Wheres my Noble Prize Please? :cool:
Diablo-B
lol, i would put the appluase gif but im too lazy to find it :P
I like where this guy is developing the theory: "Yes, his science is certainly indisputable. A male (north) and female (south) pole magnet attract and form a bond. But I wish to take his theory further. My research shows that a stack of magnets forms a FAR stronger bond. Clearly this is an indication that marriage is meant to be polygamous. The more men and women magnets involved, the stronger the attraction. So, in conclusion, marriage is meant to be polygamous, the magnets cannot lie. The next step in furthering his research will be to prove that bestiality is meant to be. I suspect magnets will also aggressively bond with things that are not magnets at all. This experimentation will involve something I call ferrous metals, but that study is not yet ready for release." Maybe magnets are the answer to the meaning of life? Or they might point us in the right direction?
Is-ought problem? Besides, is there any conclusive data to show that homosexually is genetic prediposition? I would like to think epigentics could elaborate.
.
.
Log in to comment