Reselling concert tickets for profit: is it immoral?

  • 75 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for bloodling
bloodling

5822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 bloodling
Member since 2006 • 5822 Posts

I'm talking about legal ticket resale. Some people think that it's highly immoral, others think that it's not immoral at all. What's your opinion on this?

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#2 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
I don't see any reason why it's immoral.
Avatar image for mingmao3046
mingmao3046

2683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 mingmao3046
Member since 2011 • 2683 Posts

I'm talking about legal ticket resale. I've heard some people say that it's highly immoral, and others who say that it's not immoral at all. What's your opinion on this?

bloodling
umm....no? is this seriously a question? if you are willing to wait in line or whatever to get the ticket then you should be able to sell it and make a profit
Avatar image for bloodling
bloodling

5822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 bloodling
Member since 2006 • 5822 Posts

[QUOTE="bloodling"]

I'm talking about legal ticket resale. I've heard some people say that it's highly immoral, and others who say that it's not immoral at all. What's your opinion on this?

mingmao3046

umm....no? is this seriously a question? if you are willing to wait in line or whatever to get the ticket then you should be able to sell it and make a profit

As I stated, a lot of people consider it extremely immoral, so yes this is a real question.

Avatar image for harashawn
harashawn

27620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#5 harashawn
Member since 2008 • 27620 Posts
It is in the sense that when you buy a ticket you are agreeing to not resell it.
Avatar image for jim_shorts
jim_shorts

7320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#6 jim_shorts
Member since 2006 • 7320 Posts

I don't think so. Opportunist isn't necessarily immoral.

Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts

In my opinion yes but extremely beneficial to both parties: One person makes a profit and the other person doesn't have to wait in line.

The whole thing has been done before not just with tickets but also phones and gaming systems so I don't see the big deal in all of it.

Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#8 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts
why? Its normal commerce. You bought something so you should be able to sell it for a profit if a person is willing to pay.
Avatar image for Zeviander
Zeviander

9503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 Zeviander
Member since 2011 • 9503 Posts
>Tickets sold on first-come-first-served basis >Scalper buys more tickets than they want >Person who really really really wants to go to that entertainment of choice, found out there are no tickets left >Person goes to entertainment of choice hoping someone has ticket for them >Scalper offers ticket at 300-500% profit >Person begrudgingly *chooses* to spend money despite the ticket only saying regular amount >Scalper walks away richer than when he started It's smart business, what exactly is immoral about it? If you really wanted the tickets, you would have bought them back when they first went on sale like the scalper did. "Waaaahhhhh life's not fair!", says the ticket buyer. "Indeed", responded Zeviander.
Avatar image for harashawn
harashawn

27620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#10 harashawn
Member since 2008 • 27620 Posts
why? Its normal commerce. You bought something so you should be able to sell it for a profit if a person is willing to pay.mayceV
Read the back of the ticket. Technically, you are not allowed to resell it for a profit. You agree to this condition by purchasing it.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178844 Posts

>Tickets sold on first-come-first-served basis >Scalper buys more tickets than they want >Person who really really really wants to go to that entertainment of choice, found out there are no tickets left >Person goes to entertainment of choice hoping someone has ticket for them >Scalper offers ticket at 300-500% profit >Person begrudgingly *chooses* to spend money despite the ticket only saying regular amount >Scalper walks away richer than when he started It's smart business, what exactly is immoral about it? If you really wanted the tickets, you would have bought them back when they first went on sale like the scalper did. "Waaaahhhhh life's not fair!", says the ticket buyer. "Indeed", responded Zeviander.Zeviander
Except the scalpers somehow can get the better tickets....which means something is broke with the system.

Avatar image for Zeviander
Zeviander

9503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 Zeviander
Member since 2011 • 9503 Posts
Read the back of the ticket. Technically, you are not allowed to resell it for a profit. You agree to this condition by purchasing it.harashawn
Video game publishers are trying to implement that same thing with physical copy video games. First sale doctrine.
Avatar image for Jacobistheman
Jacobistheman

3975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Jacobistheman
Member since 2007 • 3975 Posts

I'm talking about legal ticket resale. Some people think that it's highly immoral, others think that it's not immoral at all. What's your opinion on this?

bloodling
It is illegal to sell tickets for higher than face value unless somehow the appropriate taxes are paid on the higher value (which they aren't). That is why people see it as immoral.
Avatar image for harashawn
harashawn

27620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#14 harashawn
Member since 2008 • 27620 Posts
First sale doctrine.Zeviander
Not when you contractually agreed not to resell it for profit , which you did when you bought the ticket. It's silly, but that's how it works.
Avatar image for Gen007
Gen007

11006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#15 Gen007
Member since 2006 • 11006 Posts

immoral yeah i guess so. Like mentioned already you aren't supposed to buy tickets just to sell them again and the concert industry is trying to combat it at every turn so clearly there's something wrong there. Its a real dick move quite frankly.

Avatar image for jim_shorts
jim_shorts

7320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#16 jim_shorts
Member since 2006 • 7320 Posts
[QUOTE="bloodling"]

I'm talking about legal ticket resale. Some people think that it's highly immoral, others think that it's not immoral at all. What's your opinion on this?

Jacobistheman
It is illegal to sell tickets for higher than face value unless somehow the appropriate taxes are paid on the higher value (which they aren't). That is why people see it as immoral.

I would argue that something isn't necessarily immoral if it's illegal. Lots of things used to be illegal that aren't immoral.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

>Tickets sold on first-come-first-served basis >Scalper buys more tickets than they want >Person who really really really wants to go to that entertainment of choice, found out there are no tickets left >Person goes to entertainment of choice hoping someone has ticket for them >Scalper offers ticket at 300-500% profit >Person begrudgingly *chooses* to spend money despite the ticket only saying regular amount >Scalper walks away richer than when he started It's smart business, what exactly is immoral about it? If you really wanted the tickets, you would have bought them back when they first went on sale like the scalper did. "Waaaahhhhh life's not fair!", says the ticket buyer. "Indeed", responded Zeviander.Zeviander

Except that scalpers often clog the ticketing systems thus making it difficult, if not next to impossible, for ordainary fans to even access the systems to purchase tickets.

Avatar image for Zeviander
Zeviander

9503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 Zeviander
Member since 2011 • 9503 Posts
Except the scalpers somehow can the better tickets....which means something is broke with the system.LJS9502_basic
I'll assume a "get" was supposed to be in there. The system isn't broken, those providing the tickets need to 1) limit ticket sales to individuals so more people have a chance to buy, 2) accept the fact they got their money and small-time scalpers might be taking away potential profits (see: #1, but they won't do that because sales will drop if everyone has to go get their own tickets) or 3) gauge demand as accurately as possible and just charge more/less based on how much profit they want to make. When the Winnipeg Jets came back, the 12,000 (?) season tickets sold, were gone within minutes of the buying period opening online, and buyers were limited to two tickets per order (so if you wanted more, you needed multiple accounts, which decreased your chances of getting them). Then the reselling started, and True North Sports (the team owners) cracked down on those doing it (they had to register a legal address and name, and signed contracts, so they knew by seat number who it was) and only allowed reselling through a sanctioned website which they charged a nominal fee for using it. It's all business. And those who complain shouldn't be in business.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178844 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Except the scalpers somehow can the better tickets....which means something is broke with the system.Zeviander
I'll assume a "get" was supposed to be in there. The system isn't broken, those providing the tickets need to 1) limit ticket sales to individuals so more people have a chance to buy, 2) accept the fact they got their money and small-time scalpers might be taking away potential profits (see: #1, but they won't do that because sales will drop if everyone has to go get their own tickets) or 3) gauge demand as accurately as possible and just charge more/less based on how much profit they want to make. When the Winnipeg Jets came back, the 12,000 (?) season tickets sold, were gone within minutes of the buying period opening online, and buyers were limited to two tickets per order (so if you wanted more, you needed multiple accounts, which decreased your chances of getting them). Then the reselling started, and True North Sports (the team owners) cracked down on those doing it (they had to register a legal address and name, and signed contracts, so they knew by seat number who it was) and only allowed reselling through a sanctioned website which they charged a nominal fee for using it. It's all business. And those who complain shouldn't be in business.

Get is in there. I edited. Yes the system is broken when ticket sales are limited and on a first come first serve basis and buying the tickets the first minute of a pre sale gets you up in the rafters on the opposite side of the stage.
Avatar image for Jackc8
Jackc8

8515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#20 Jackc8
Member since 2007 • 8515 Posts

Can't really see how anyone could think that was any more immoral than what the outfit who sold them in the first place did.

Avatar image for Laihendi
Laihendi

5872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Laihendi
Member since 2009 • 5872 Posts

[QUOTE="Zeviander"]>Tickets sold on first-come-first-served basis >Scalper buys more tickets than they want >Person who really really really wants to go to that entertainment of choice, found out there are no tickets left >Person goes to entertainment of choice hoping someone has ticket for them >Scalper offers ticket at 300-500% profit >Person begrudgingly *chooses* to spend money despite the ticket only saying regular amount >Scalper walks away richer than when he started It's smart business, what exactly is immoral about it? If you really wanted the tickets, you would have bought them back when they first went on sale like the scalper did. "Waaaahhhhh life's not fair!", says the ticket buyer. "Indeed", responded Zeviander.worlock77

Except that scalpers often clog the ticketing systems thus making it difficult, if not next to impossible, for ordainary fans to even access the systems to purchase tickets.

If there is still enough demand to sell all of the tickets for more than the original price, then that just means they were being sold too cheaply originally.
Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts
"Immorality" is an authoritarian concept to control individuals. Live without limits and without regrets,
Avatar image for ShadowsDemon
ShadowsDemon

10059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#23 ShadowsDemon
Member since 2012 • 10059 Posts
If people want to buy them then I don't see why not.
Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

"Immorality" is an authoritarian concept to control individuals. Live without limits and without regrets,Rhazakna

We evolved out of that mentality when we first built houses and created societies. You can go back to live in the jungle if you feel like you don't have enough freedom, mr armchair general.

Avatar image for johnd13
johnd13

11125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 johnd13
Member since 2011 • 11125 Posts

If people want to buy them then I don't see why not.ShadowsDemon

This. As long as you don' t offer it at an unreasonably high price then all people involved are gonna gain sth.

Avatar image for Laihendi
Laihendi

5872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Laihendi
Member since 2009 • 5872 Posts
"Immorality" is an authoritarian concept to control individuals. Live without limits and without regrets,Rhazakna
Steal and murder at will. Live without limits and without regrets.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"]"Immorality" is an authoritarian concept to control individuals. Live without limits and without regrets,Laihendi
Steal and murder at will. Live without limits and without regrets.

Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.

Avatar image for ShadowsDemon
ShadowsDemon

10059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#28 ShadowsDemon
Member since 2012 • 10059 Posts

[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="Rhazakna"]"Immorality" is an authoritarian concept to control individuals. Live without limits and without regrets,worlock77

Steal and murder at will. Live without limits and without regrets.

Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.

I think he was being sarcastic? :|
Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"]"Immorality" is an authoritarian concept to control individuals. Live without limits and without regrets,N30F3N1X

We evolved out of that mentality when we first built houses and created societies. You can go back to live in the jungle if you feel like you don't have enough freedom, mr armchair general.

Looks like someone needs to brush up on nihilism as a philosophy. I know you won't, though. It's much easier to just dismiss things.
Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts
[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Laihendi"] Steal and murder at will. Live without limits and without regrets.ShadowsDemon

Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.

I think he was being sarcastic? :|

Nope, I'm a nihilist.
Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts

[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="Rhazakna"]"Immorality" is an authoritarian concept to control individuals. Live without limits and without regrets,worlock77

Steal and murder at will. Live without limits and without regrets.

Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.

Morality has been an excuse for genocide, murder, and every other brutality you can name. No one is more authoritarian than someone who believes they have "morality" on their side.
Avatar image for Laihendi
Laihendi

5872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Laihendi
Member since 2009 • 5872 Posts
[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Laihendi"] Steal and murder at will. Live without limits and without regrets.Rhazakna

Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.

Morality has been an excuse for genocide, murder, and every other brutality you can name. No one is more authoritarian than someone who believes they have "morality" on their side.

If authoritarianism isn't immoral, why do you dislike it so much?
Avatar image for supa_badman
supa_badman

16714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#33 supa_badman
Member since 2008 • 16714 Posts

Not really immoral.

Supply and demand, baby

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowsDemon"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.

Rhazakna

I think he was being sarcastic? :|

Nope, I'm a nihilist.

"Nihilists? F*ck me. I mean say what you will about the tenants of National Socialism, at least it's an ethos."

Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

Looks like someone needs to brush up on nihilism as a philosophy. I know you won't, though. It's much easier to just dismiss things.Rhazakna

Odd that you say that considering I believe in existential nihilism.

Perhaps you're the one who should take your head out of your ass and start looking for a bit of insight regarding how our minds work, instead of trying to use some asshat conjecture to talk about things you know nothing of.

Avatar image for supa_badman
supa_badman

16714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#36 supa_badman
Member since 2008 • 16714 Posts

[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="Rhazakna"]"Immorality" is an authoritarian concept to control individuals. Live without limits and without regrets,worlock77

Steal and murder at will. Live without limits and without regrets.

Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.

Stealing and murdering is better to justify when you just feel like it?
Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

Morality has been an excuse for genocide, murder, and every other brutality you can name. No one is more authoritarian than someone who believes they have "morality" on their side. Rhazakna

Lack of morality would have been even worse. Herp derp.

"Oh, and you know the thing about chaos? It's fair!"

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.

Laihendi

Morality has been an excuse for genocide, murder, and every other brutality you can name. No one is more authoritarian than someone who believes they have "morality" on their side.

If authoritarianism isn't immoral, why do you dislike it so much?

it crushes freedom, squashes liberties and favors the few at the expense of all else.

Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts
[QUOTE="Rhazakna"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.

Laihendi
Morality has been an excuse for genocide, murder, and every other brutality you can name. No one is more authoritarian than someone who believes they have "morality" on their side.

If authoritarianism isn't immoral, why do you dislike it so much?

Because it's opposed to my values (which are completely subjective). I don't think authoritarianism is "wrong" or that people "ought" not to be authoritarian. Authoritarianism makes sense if you hold certain values, like complete societal cohesion.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Laihendi"] Steal and murder at will. Live without limits and without regrets.supa_badman

Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.

Stealing and murdering is better to justify when you just feel like it?

What?

Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

it crushes freedom, squashes liberties and favors the few at the expense of all else.

worlock77

Your freedom ends where the freedom of others begins.

And people who work harder towards a field or discipline should be favored over those that invest less or nothing into it.

Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"]Looks like someone needs to brush up on nihilism as a philosophy. I know you won't, though. It's much easier to just dismiss things.N30F3N1X

Odd that you say that considering I believe in existential nihilism.

Perhaps you're the one who should take your head out of your ass and start looking for a bit of insight regarding how our minds work, instead of trying to use some asshat conjecture to talk about things you know nothing of.

You're a nihilist, but you believe there are ways people "ought" to act? I never made any claim about people's minds, so that's a non-sequitor. What we understand as "morality" may be inherent to some degree, but that doesn't mean those ideas should control our actions on an individual level.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

it crushes freedom, squashes liberties and favors the few at the expense of all else.

N30F3N1X

Your freedom ends where the freedom of others begins.

And people who work harder towards a field or discipline should be favored over those that invest less or nothing into it.

Neither of those have anything to do with my point.

Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"]Morality has been an excuse for genocide, murder, and every other brutality you can name. No one is more authoritarian than someone who believes they have "morality" on their side. N30F3N1X

Lack of morality would have been even worse. Herp derp.

"Oh, and you know the thing about chaos? It's fair!"

Based on what? How do you get people to fight and die for things that have nothing to do with them? You tell them they have a moral duty to serve something "greater". All wars, all genocides, all violent collectivism has been justified with some view of morality. How would it be worse, and by what standard if people could see through that bullsh*t?
Avatar image for supa_badman
supa_badman

16714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#45 supa_badman
Member since 2008 • 16714 Posts

[QUOTE="supa_badman"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.

worlock77

Stealing and murdering is better to justify when you just feel like it?

What?

I just feel like your answer is a sh!tty answer, I want you to expand. What would be better?
Avatar image for Zeviander
Zeviander

9503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 Zeviander
Member since 2011 • 9503 Posts
We evolved out of that mentality when we first built houses and created societies. You can go back to live in the jungle if you feel like you don't have enough freedom, mr armchair general.N30F3N1X
You are so ignorant of his point it isn't even funny. But I will laugh for you benefit. :lol:
Steal and murder at will. Live without limits and without regrets.Laihendi
Such a binary view of morality is dangerous.
Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

You're a nihilist, but you believe there are ways people "ought" to act? I never made any claim about people's minds, so that's a non-sequitor. What we understand as "morality" may be inherent to some degree, but that doesn't mean those ideas should control our actions on an individual level.Rhazakna

I said I believe in existential nihilism. Life itself means nothing to me.

What do you mean you never made any claim about people's minds?

"Immorality" is an authoritarian conceptYou

Herp derp?

Then try to live a day using lack of integrity, dishonesty and unfairness as your principles. Tell me how well that works out for you.

Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

Neither of those have anything to do with my point.

worlock77

Of course they do. You're saying how bad authoritarianism is and why you'd like to get rid of it, and I'm saying why it is here.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="supa_badman"] Stealing and murdering is better to justify when you just feel like it?supa_badman

What?

I just feel like your answer is a sh!tty answer, I want you to expand. What would be better?

You'll have to explain how it's a sh*tty answer first.

Avatar image for supa_badman
supa_badman

16714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#50 supa_badman
Member since 2008 • 16714 Posts
[QUOTE="N30F3N1X"]

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"]Morality has been an excuse for genocide, murder, and every other brutality you can name. No one is more authoritarian than someone who believes they have "morality" on their side. Rhazakna

Lack of morality would have been even worse. Herp derp.

"Oh, and you know the thing about chaos? It's fair!"

Based on what? How do you get people to fight and die for things that have nothing to do with them? You tell them they have a moral duty to serve something "greater". All wars, all genocides, all violent collectivism has been justified with some view of morality. How would it be worse, and by what standard if people could see through that bullsh*t?

Oh nooooooo, war is bad? What? World leaders are corrupt too? Nooooooooo Morality isn't just used in war, its a foundation for a society, granted, its a foundation that's subject to change as the times and culture changes, but it's there for a reason nonetheless. Saying morality is a bad thing and just doing what you want is; first off, useless and selfish (although, that may be what a sh!tty human being wants) and second off, wouldn't living by your own code be another form of morality?