I'm talking about legal ticket resale. Some people think that it's highly immoral, others think that it's not immoral at all. What's your opinion on this?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
umm....no? is this seriously a question? if you are willing to wait in line or whatever to get the ticket then you should be able to sell it and make a profitI'm talking about legal ticket resale. I've heard some people say that it's highly immoral, and others who say that it's not immoral at all. What's your opinion on this?
bloodling
[QUOTE="bloodling"]umm....no? is this seriously a question? if you are willing to wait in line or whatever to get the ticket then you should be able to sell it and make a profitI'm talking about legal ticket resale. I've heard some people say that it's highly immoral, and others who say that it's not immoral at all. What's your opinion on this?
mingmao3046
As I stated, a lot of people consider it extremely immoral, so yes this is a real question.
In my opinion yes but extremely beneficial to both parties: One person makes a profit and the other person doesn't have to wait in line.
The whole thing has been done before not just with tickets but also phones and gaming systems so I don't see the big deal in all of it.
why? Its normal commerce. You bought something so you should be able to sell it for a profit if a person is willing to pay.mayceVRead the back of the ticket. Technically, you are not allowed to resell it for a profit. You agree to this condition by purchasing it.
>Tickets sold on first-come-first-served basis >Scalper buys more tickets than they want >Person who really really really wants to go to that entertainment of choice, found out there are no tickets left >Person goes to entertainment of choice hoping someone has ticket for them >Scalper offers ticket at 300-500% profit >Person begrudgingly *chooses* to spend money despite the ticket only saying regular amount >Scalper walks away richer than when he started It's smart business, what exactly is immoral about it? If you really wanted the tickets, you would have bought them back when they first went on sale like the scalper did. "Waaaahhhhh life's not fair!", says the ticket buyer. "Indeed", responded Zeviander.ZevianderExcept the scalpers somehow can get the better tickets....which means something is broke with the system.
Read the back of the ticket. Technically, you are not allowed to resell it for a profit. You agree to this condition by purchasing it.harashawnVideo game publishers are trying to implement that same thing with physical copy video games. First sale doctrine.
It is illegal to sell tickets for higher than face value unless somehow the appropriate taxes are paid on the higher value (which they aren't). That is why people see it as immoral.I'm talking about legal ticket resale. Some people think that it's highly immoral, others think that it's not immoral at all. What's your opinion on this?
bloodling
[QUOTE="bloodling"]It is illegal to sell tickets for higher than face value unless somehow the appropriate taxes are paid on the higher value (which they aren't). That is why people see it as immoral. I would argue that something isn't necessarily immoral if it's illegal. Lots of things used to be illegal that aren't immoral.I'm talking about legal ticket resale. Some people think that it's highly immoral, others think that it's not immoral at all. What's your opinion on this?
Jacobistheman
>Tickets sold on first-come-first-served basis >Scalper buys more tickets than they want >Person who really really really wants to go to that entertainment of choice, found out there are no tickets left >Person goes to entertainment of choice hoping someone has ticket for them >Scalper offers ticket at 300-500% profit >Person begrudgingly *chooses* to spend money despite the ticket only saying regular amount >Scalper walks away richer than when he started It's smart business, what exactly is immoral about it? If you really wanted the tickets, you would have bought them back when they first went on sale like the scalper did. "Waaaahhhhh life's not fair!", says the ticket buyer. "Indeed", responded Zeviander.Zeviander
Except that scalpers often clog the ticketing systems thus making it difficult, if not next to impossible, for ordainary fans to even access the systems to purchase tickets.
Except the scalpers somehow can the better tickets....which means something is broke with the system.LJS9502_basicI'll assume a "get" was supposed to be in there. The system isn't broken, those providing the tickets need to 1) limit ticket sales to individuals so more people have a chance to buy, 2) accept the fact they got their money and small-time scalpers might be taking away potential profits (see: #1, but they won't do that because sales will drop if everyone has to go get their own tickets) or 3) gauge demand as accurately as possible and just charge more/less based on how much profit they want to make. When the Winnipeg Jets came back, the 12,000 (?) season tickets sold, were gone within minutes of the buying period opening online, and buyers were limited to two tickets per order (so if you wanted more, you needed multiple accounts, which decreased your chances of getting them). Then the reselling started, and True North Sports (the team owners) cracked down on those doing it (they had to register a legal address and name, and signed contracts, so they knew by seat number who it was) and only allowed reselling through a sanctioned website which they charged a nominal fee for using it. It's all business. And those who complain shouldn't be in business.
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Except the scalpers somehow can the better tickets....which means something is broke with the system.ZevianderI'll assume a "get" was supposed to be in there. The system isn't broken, those providing the tickets need to 1) limit ticket sales to individuals so more people have a chance to buy, 2) accept the fact they got their money and small-time scalpers might be taking away potential profits (see: #1, but they won't do that because sales will drop if everyone has to go get their own tickets) or 3) gauge demand as accurately as possible and just charge more/less based on how much profit they want to make. When the Winnipeg Jets came back, the 12,000 (?) season tickets sold, were gone within minutes of the buying period opening online, and buyers were limited to two tickets per order (so if you wanted more, you needed multiple accounts, which decreased your chances of getting them). Then the reselling started, and True North Sports (the team owners) cracked down on those doing it (they had to register a legal address and name, and signed contracts, so they knew by seat number who it was) and only allowed reselling through a sanctioned website which they charged a nominal fee for using it. It's all business. And those who complain shouldn't be in business.Get is in there. I edited. Yes the system is broken when ticket sales are limited and on a first come first serve basis and buying the tickets the first minute of a pre sale gets you up in the rafters on the opposite side of the stage.
[QUOTE="Zeviander"]>Tickets sold on first-come-first-served basis >Scalper buys more tickets than they want >Person who really really really wants to go to that entertainment of choice, found out there are no tickets left >Person goes to entertainment of choice hoping someone has ticket for them >Scalper offers ticket at 300-500% profit >Person begrudgingly *chooses* to spend money despite the ticket only saying regular amount >Scalper walks away richer than when he started It's smart business, what exactly is immoral about it? If you really wanted the tickets, you would have bought them back when they first went on sale like the scalper did. "Waaaahhhhh life's not fair!", says the ticket buyer. "Indeed", responded Zeviander.worlock77
Except that scalpers often clog the ticketing systems thus making it difficult, if not next to impossible, for ordainary fans to even access the systems to purchase tickets.
If there is still enough demand to sell all of the tickets for more than the original price, then that just means they were being sold too cheaply originally."Immorality" is an authoritarian concept to control individuals. Live without limits and without regrets,Rhazakna
We evolved out of that mentality when we first built houses and created societies. You can go back to live in the jungle if you feel like you don't have enough freedom, mr armchair general.
[QUOTE="Rhazakna"]"Immorality" is an authoritarian concept to control individuals. Live without limits and without regrets,LaihendiSteal and murder at will. Live without limits and without regrets.
Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.
Steal and murder at will. Live without limits and without regrets.[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="Rhazakna"]"Immorality" is an authoritarian concept to control individuals. Live without limits and without regrets,worlock77
Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.
I think he was being sarcastic? :|[QUOTE="Rhazakna"]"Immorality" is an authoritarian concept to control individuals. Live without limits and without regrets,N30F3N1X
We evolved out of that mentality when we first built houses and created societies. You can go back to live in the jungle if you feel like you don't have enough freedom, mr armchair general.
Looks like someone needs to brush up on nihilism as a philosophy. I know you won't, though. It's much easier to just dismiss things.Steal and murder at will. Live without limits and without regrets.[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="Rhazakna"]"Immorality" is an authoritarian concept to control individuals. Live without limits and without regrets,worlock77
Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.
Morality has been an excuse for genocide, murder, and every other brutality you can name. No one is more authoritarian than someone who believes they have "morality" on their side.[QUOTE="worlock77"][QUOTE="Laihendi"] Steal and murder at will. Live without limits and without regrets.Rhazakna
Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.
Morality has been an excuse for genocide, murder, and every other brutality you can name. No one is more authoritarian than someone who believes they have "morality" on their side. If authoritarianism isn't immoral, why do you dislike it so much?[QUOTE="ShadowsDemon"][QUOTE="worlock77"]I think he was being sarcastic? :| Nope, I'm a nihilist.Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.
Rhazakna
"Nihilists? F*ck me. I mean say what you will about the tenants of National Socialism, at least it's an ethos."
Looks like someone needs to brush up on nihilism as a philosophy. I know you won't, though. It's much easier to just dismiss things.Rhazakna
Odd that you say that considering I believe in existential nihilism.
Perhaps you're the one who should take your head out of your ass and start looking for a bit of insight regarding how our minds work, instead of trying to use some asshat conjecture to talk about things you know nothing of.
Steal and murder at will. Live without limits and without regrets.[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="Rhazakna"]"Immorality" is an authoritarian concept to control individuals. Live without limits and without regrets,worlock77
Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.
Stealing and murdering is better to justify when you just feel like it?Morality has been an excuse for genocide, murder, and every other brutality you can name. No one is more authoritarian than someone who believes they have "morality" on their side. Rhazakna
Lack of morality would have been even worse. Herp derp.
"Oh, and you know the thing about chaos? It's fair!"
[QUOTE="Rhazakna"][QUOTE="worlock77"]Morality has been an excuse for genocide, murder, and every other brutality you can name. No one is more authoritarian than someone who believes they have "morality" on their side. If authoritarianism isn't immoral, why do you dislike it so much?Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.
Laihendi
it crushes freedom, squashes liberties and favors the few at the expense of all else.
[QUOTE="Rhazakna"][QUOTE="worlock77"]Morality has been an excuse for genocide, murder, and every other brutality you can name. No one is more authoritarian than someone who believes they have "morality" on their side. If authoritarianism isn't immoral, why do you dislike it so much? Because it's opposed to my values (which are completely subjective). I don't think authoritarianism is "wrong" or that people "ought" not to be authoritarian. Authoritarianism makes sense if you hold certain values, like complete societal cohesion.Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.
Laihendi
[QUOTE="worlock77"][QUOTE="Laihendi"] Steal and murder at will. Live without limits and without regrets.supa_badman
Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.
Stealing and murdering is better to justify when you just feel like it?What?
it crushes freedom, squashes liberties and favors the few at the expense of all else.
worlock77
Your freedom ends where the freedom of others begins.
And people who work harder towards a field or discipline should be favored over those that invest less or nothing into it.
[QUOTE="Rhazakna"]Looks like someone needs to brush up on nihilism as a philosophy. I know you won't, though. It's much easier to just dismiss things.N30F3N1X
Odd that you say that considering I believe in existential nihilism.
Perhaps you're the one who should take your head out of your ass and start looking for a bit of insight regarding how our minds work, instead of trying to use some asshat conjecture to talk about things you know nothing of.
You're a nihilist, but you believe there are ways people "ought" to act? I never made any claim about people's minds, so that's a non-sequitor. What we understand as "morality" may be inherent to some degree, but that doesn't mean those ideas should control our actions on an individual level.[QUOTE="worlock77"]
it crushes freedom, squashes liberties and favors the few at the expense of all else.
N30F3N1X
Your freedom ends where the freedom of others begins.
And people who work harder towards a field or discipline should be favored over those that invest less or nothing into it.
Neither of those have anything to do with my point.
[QUOTE="Rhazakna"]Morality has been an excuse for genocide, murder, and every other brutality you can name. No one is more authoritarian than someone who believes they have "morality" on their side. N30F3N1X
Lack of morality would have been even worse. Herp derp.
"Oh, and you know the thing about chaos? It's fair!"
Based on what? How do you get people to fight and die for things that have nothing to do with them? You tell them they have a moral duty to serve something "greater". All wars, all genocides, all violent collectivism has been justified with some view of morality. How would it be worse, and by what standard if people could see through that bullsh*t?Stealing and murdering is better to justify when you just feel like it?[QUOTE="supa_badman"][QUOTE="worlock77"]
Lots of people have stolen and murdered and found ways to "morally" justify it.
worlock77
What?
I just feel like your answer is a sh!tty answer, I want you to expand. What would be better?We evolved out of that mentality when we first built houses and created societies. You can go back to live in the jungle if you feel like you don't have enough freedom, mr armchair general.N30F3N1XYou are so ignorant of his point it isn't even funny. But I will laugh for you benefit. :lol:
Steal and murder at will. Live without limits and without regrets.LaihendiSuch a binary view of morality is dangerous.
You're a nihilist, but you believe there are ways people "ought" to act? I never made any claim about people's minds, so that's a non-sequitor. What we understand as "morality" may be inherent to some degree, but that doesn't mean those ideas should control our actions on an individual level.Rhazakna
I said I believe in existential nihilism. Life itself means nothing to me.
What do you mean you never made any claim about people's minds?
"Immorality" is an authoritarian conceptYou
Herp derp?
Then try to live a day using lack of integrity, dishonesty and unfairness as your principles. Tell me how well that works out for you.
[QUOTE="worlock77"][QUOTE="supa_badman"] Stealing and murdering is better to justify when you just feel like it?supa_badman
What?
I just feel like your answer is a sh!tty answer, I want you to expand. What would be better?You'll have to explain how it's a sh*tty answer first.
[QUOTE="N30F3N1X"][QUOTE="Rhazakna"]Morality has been an excuse for genocide, murder, and every other brutality you can name. No one is more authoritarian than someone who believes they have "morality" on their side. Rhazakna
Lack of morality would have been even worse. Herp derp.
"Oh, and you know the thing about chaos? It's fair!"
Based on what? How do you get people to fight and die for things that have nothing to do with them? You tell them they have a moral duty to serve something "greater". All wars, all genocides, all violent collectivism has been justified with some view of morality. How would it be worse, and by what standard if people could see through that bullsh*t? Oh nooooooo, war is bad? What? World leaders are corrupt too? Nooooooooo Morality isn't just used in war, its a foundation for a society, granted, its a foundation that's subject to change as the times and culture changes, but it's there for a reason nonetheless. Saying morality is a bad thing and just doing what you want is; first off, useless and selfish (although, that may be what a sh!tty human being wants) and second off, wouldn't living by your own code be another form of morality?Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment