This topic is locked from further discussion.
The only one who should have a say on what to do with it is the woman carrying it. EDIT: If she wants to have the kid and he wants to leave, let him. He'll just have to pay child support. There's no reason why he should have to stay in the relationship if he doesn't love her.krazykillaz
i just cant seem to take you seriously.... i think its the hippo.... hehe
[QUOTE="ItalStallion777"]i only believe abortion is ok if the mother is in danger or if the woman was raped.quiglythegreatBut do you feel so strongly about that that you want it legislated, enforced by men with pepper-spray and firearms? I may think that lying is usually wrong, or that breaking a person's heart is wrong, but would I ever want a law saying that people couldn't do either? No, of course not.
i honestly can't say at this point. you make a good point though.
Pro-Choice. If you are considering abortion in the first place, it'd be better for the child not to have lived at all unless you can guarentee him/her a life worth living. You pro-life guys act like life is amazing and your denying a child of it. That's not true at at all. Life is hell and sometimes it'd be better not to have that future baby born at all. GodLovesDead
SO its better to die then live an average life. :?
Pro-Choice. If you are considering abortion in the first place, it'd be better for the child not to have lived at all unless you can guarentee him/her a life worth living. You pro-life guys act like life is amazing and your denying a child of it. That's not true at at all. Life is hell and sometimes it'd be better not to have that future baby born at all. GodLovesDead
ew.... talk about pessimist
Pro-Choice. If you are considering abortion in the first place, it'd be better for the child not to have lived at all unless you can guarentee him/her a life worth living. You pro-life guys act like life is amazing and your denying a child of it. That's not true at at all. Life is hell and sometimes it'd be better not to have that future baby born at all. GodLovesDeadThat's a terrible argument. Life is beautiful, but beauty is relative. A good example is how some people manage to believe that South Park is not the best show ever. Now, as far as that's concerned, women should be getting impregnated as much as possible so as to give birth to more souls to experience the joy of the intelligent vulgarity and often scathing insight South Park offers. The "life sucks anway, so you should kill them" is just a bad argument. Life doesn't suck, life rules, unless you're depressed. Get help. ANYWAY, also saying that a moment's hesitation means that you should automatically go all in is kind of saying that pretty much all our mothers' should've just gotten rid of us. Pregnancy is a scary thing. It's usually not something you're calm about, even if you're trying to precipitate it. That has nothing to do with how well the mother will raise her child.
[QUOTE="krazykillaz"]The only one who should have a say on what to do with it is the woman carrying it.Oleg_Huzwog
What about the father?
He's not the one who carries it for 9 months.See the biggest thing that makes me not care is alot of the mothers getting abortions are pretty set on not having a baby. If we sit here and go "No, you don't have a choice and you must give birth" we are going to get alot more cases of people hurting themselves or going to extreme measures to not have one. Smoke89And that's when I start my multimillion dollar bussiness; Coat-Hangers R Us.
[QUOTE="Smoke89"]See the biggest thing that makes me not care is alot of the mothers getting abortions are pretty set on not having a baby. If we sit here and go "No, you don't have a choice and you must give birth" we are going to get alot more cases of people hurting themselves or going to extreme measures to not have one. ErasornAnd that's when I start my multimillion dollar bussiness; Coat-Hangers R Us.
thats inappropriate and offensive.
And that's when I start my multimillion dollar bussiness; Coat-Hangers R Us.[QUOTE="Erasorn"][QUOTE="Smoke89"]See the biggest thing that makes me not care is alot of the mothers getting abortions are pretty set on not having a baby. If we sit here and go "No, you don't have a choice and you must give birth" we are going to get alot more cases of people hurting themselves or going to extreme measures to not have one. PeterPerson
thats inappropriate and offensive.
I wouldn't go so far as to call it inappropriate (made me chuckle), though it clearly offends you.[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"][QUOTE="krazykillaz"]The only one who should have a say on what to do with it is the woman carrying it.krazykillaz
What about the father?
He's not the one who carries it for 9 months.Why should that matter? It's his offspring, too. What if a father wants the child and is willing to assume full responsibility in raising it?
[QUOTE="PeterPerson"]And that's when I start my multimillion dollar bussiness; Coat-Hangers R Us.[QUOTE="Erasorn"][QUOTE="Smoke89"]See the biggest thing that makes me not care is alot of the mothers getting abortions are pretty set on not having a baby. If we sit here and go "No, you don't have a choice and you must give birth" we are going to get alot more cases of people hurting themselves or going to extreme measures to not have one. quiglythegreat
thats inappropriate and offensive.
I wouldn't go so far as to call it inappropriate (made me chuckle), though it clearly offends you.it doesnt really offend me. i just thought id let him know that that could be potentially offensive to someone. just trying to be nice...
[QUOTE="krazykillaz"][QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"][QUOTE="krazykillaz"]The only one who should have a say on what to do with it is the woman carrying it.Oleg_Huzwog
What about the father?
He's not the one who carries it for 9 months.Why should that matter? It's his offspring, too. What if a father wants the child and is willing to assume full responsibility in raising it?
Then he better hope the woman is willing to carry it. It's not his body. He can't force her to keep it if she doesn't want it.[QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]Pro-Choice. If you are considering abortion in the first place, it'd be better for the child not to have lived at all unless you can guarentee him/her a life worth living. You pro-life guys act like life is amazing and your denying a child of it. That's not true at at all. Life is hell and sometimes it'd be better not to have that future baby born at all. quiglythegreatThat's a terrible argument. Life is beautiful, but beauty is relative. A good example is how some people manage to believe that South Park is not the best show ever. Now, as far as that's concerned, women should be getting impregnated as much as possible so as to give birth to more souls to experience the joy of the intelligent vulgarity and often scathing insight South Park offers. The "life sucks anway, so you should kill them" is just a bad argument. Life doesn't suck, life rules, unless you're depressed. Get help. ANYWAY, also saying that a moment's hesitation means that you should automatically go all in is kind of saying that pretty much all our mothers' should've just gotten rid of us. Pregnancy is a scary thing. It's usually not something you're calm about, even if you're trying to precipitate it. That has nothing to do with how well the mother will raise her child.
If you're seriously considering abortion, you're not ready to raise your child. End of story. Killing a pre-fetus is like wearing a condom. Except it's at a much later stage. There's nothing pessimistic or sadistic about my argument, and if you think so - you haven't bothered to understand it.
Then he better hope the woman is willing to carry it. It's not his body. He can't force her to keep it if she doesn't want it.krazykillaz
Ah, but the entire pro-life movement is built around the belief that it's not HER body either, it's a third body that just happens to reside within her's.
That's a terrible argument. Life is beautiful, but beauty is relative. A good example is how some people manage to believe that South Park is not the best show ever. Now, as far as that's concerned, women should be getting impregnated as much as possible so as to give birth to more souls to experience the joy of the intelligent vulgarity and often scathing insight South Park offers. The "life sucks anway, so you should kill them" is just a bad argument. Life doesn't suck, life rules, unless you're depressed. Get help. ANYWAY, also saying that a moment's hesitation means that you should automatically go all in is kind of saying that pretty much all our mothers' should've just gotten rid of us. Pregnancy is a scary thing. It's usually not something you're calm about, even if you're trying to precipitate it. That has nothing to do with how well the mother will raise her child.[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]Pro-Choice. If you are considering abortion in the first place, it'd be better for the child not to have lived at all unless you can guarentee him/her a life worth living. You pro-life guys act like life is amazing and your denying a child of it. That's not true at at all. Life is hell and sometimes it'd be better not to have that future baby born at all. GodLovesDead
If you're seriously considering abortion, you're not ready to raise your child. End of story. Killing a pre-fetus is like wearing a condom. Except it's at a much later stage. There's nothing pessimistic or sadistic about my argument, and if you think so - you haven't bothered to understand it.
I understand your argument. One moment of doubt does not mean for a lifetime of bad parenting or that a potential life should be extinguished.If you're seriously considering abortion, you're not ready to raise your child. End of story. Killing a pre-fetus is like wearing a condom. Except it's at a much later stage. There's nothing pessimistic or sadistic about my argument, and if you think so - you haven't bothered to understand it.
GodLovesDead
The killing part is. Whats wrong with adoption. My friend is adopted.
[QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]That's a terrible argument. Life is beautiful, but beauty is relative. A good example is how some people manage to believe that South Park is not the best show ever. Now, as far as that's concerned, women should be getting impregnated as much as possible so as to give birth to more souls to experience the joy of the intelligent vulgarity and often scathing insight South Park offers. The "life sucks anway, so you should kill them" is just a bad argument. Life doesn't suck, life rules, unless you're depressed. Get help. ANYWAY, also saying that a moment's hesitation means that you should automatically go all in is kind of saying that pretty much all our mothers' should've just gotten rid of us. Pregnancy is a scary thing. It's usually not something you're calm about, even if you're trying to precipitate it. That has nothing to do with how well the mother will raise her child.[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]Pro-Choice. If you are considering abortion in the first place, it'd be better for the child not to have lived at all unless you can guarentee him/her a life worth living. You pro-life guys act like life is amazing and your denying a child of it. That's not true at at all. Life is hell and sometimes it'd be better not to have that future baby born at all. quiglythegreat
If you're seriously considering abortion, you're not ready to raise your child. End of story. Killing a pre-fetus is like wearing a condom. Except it's at a much later stage. There's nothing pessimistic or sadistic about my argument, and if you think so - you haven't bothered to understand it.
I understand your argument. One moment of doubt does not mean for a lifetime of bad parenting or that a potential life should be extinguished.Potential life is endless. Do I even need to bring up the recent story of a baby found in a dumpster?
[QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]If you're seriously considering abortion, you're not ready to raise your child. End of story. Killing a pre-fetus is like wearing a condom. Except it's at a much later stage. There's nothing pessimistic or sadistic about my argument, and if you think so - you haven't bothered to understand it.
Mythbuster4ever
The killing part is. Whats wrong with adoption. My friend is adopted.
By masturbating you are killing sperm. So I guess that's wrong too?
if your aloud to kill a babie while its still inside you then what would be the difference of killing it when its born. you guys are saying "the mom can do what she wants with her child" well then what would be wrong with your mom deciding to kill you today?PeterPerson
Because most abortions are performed when the embryo is still a clump of cells.
I could care less if someone gets an abortion... I think it should be up to those involved, not us. But then why not just take abortion babies and use them for stem cell research... it was going to be killed anyways, might as well make it useful.Smoke89
That could be a good solution.
That's a terrible argument. Life is beautiful, but beauty is relative. A good example is how some people manage to believe that South Park is not the best show ever. Now, as far as that's concerned, women should be getting impregnated as much as possible so as to give birth to more souls to experience the joy of the intelligent vulgarity and often scathing insight South Park offers. The "life sucks anway, so you should kill them" is just a bad argument. Life doesn't suck, life rules, unless you're depressed. Get help. ANYWAY, also saying that a moment's hesitation means that you should automatically go all in is kind of saying that pretty much all our mothers' should've just gotten rid of us. Pregnancy is a scary thing. It's usually not something you're calm about, even if you're trying to precipitate it. That has nothing to do with how well the mother will raise her child.[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]Pro-Choice. If you are considering abortion in the first place, it'd be better for the child not to have lived at all unless you can guarentee him/her a life worth living. You pro-life guys act like life is amazing and your denying a child of it. That's not true at at all. Life is hell and sometimes it'd be better not to have that future baby born at all. GodLovesDead
If you're seriously considering abortion, you're not ready to raise your child. End of story. Killing a pre-fetus is like wearing a condom. Except it's at a much later stage. There's nothing pessimistic or sadistic about my argument, and if you think so - you haven't bothered to understand it.
Well if you're not ready to raise a child then maybe that person should have thought of the consequences before having sex. Also if you're not ready, you could give the baby up for adoption because there are tons of people that want kids that can't have them.abortion is wrong. its murder. its in the bible.PeterPersoni THINK you should be trying to make secular arguments against abortion
[QUOTE="Smoke89"]I could care less if someone gets an abortion... I think it should be up to those involved, not us. But then why not just take abortion babies and use them for stem cell research... it was going to be killed anyways, might as well make it useful.ninjacat11
That could be a good solution.
The only problem I see with that is that some can argue that fetuses are life. If so, where does one draw the line? Should we experiment on the mentally handicapped since they will die anyways and serve no purpose to society? It's a pretty grey area and it needs to be discussed (referring to embryonic stem cell research).
Note: I don't mean to be offensive. One of my relatives is mentally handicapped.
That's a terrible argument. Life is beautiful, but beauty is relative. A good example is how some people manage to believe that South Park is not the best show ever. Now, as far as that's concerned, women should be getting impregnated as much as possible so as to give birth to more souls to experience the joy of the intelligent vulgarity and often scathing insight South Park offers. The "life sucks anway, so you should kill them" is just a bad argument. Life doesn't suck, life rules, unless you're depressed. Get help. ANYWAY, also saying that a moment's hesitation means that you should automatically go all in is kind of saying that pretty much all our mothers' should've just gotten rid of us. Pregnancy is a scary thing. It's usually not something you're calm about, even if you're trying to precipitate it. That has nothing to do with how well the mother will raise her child.[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]Pro-Choice. If you are considering abortion in the first place, it'd be better for the child not to have lived at all unless you can guarentee him/her a life worth living. You pro-life guys act like life is amazing and your denying a child of it. That's not true at at all. Life is hell and sometimes it'd be better not to have that future baby born at all. GodLovesDead
If you're seriously considering abortion, you're not ready to raise your child. End of story. Killing a pre-fetus is like wearing a condom. Except it's at a much later stage. There's nothing pessimistic or sadistic about my argument, and if you think so - you haven't bothered to understand it.
ok then, if the mother is not ready for a child then why not give the child up for adoption? very viable option and no life will be lost.
and no, semen and a fertilyzed embryo is not the same thing. where i come from that fertilyzed egg develops into a child whereas semen does nothing on it's own.
i believe this all comes down to birth control. there will be very few unwanted pregnacies if the mother (or father) takes the necessary procedures to prevent it. why punish a living thing when it's the parents fault? you have to take responsibility for your actions and do what's right.
[QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]If you're seriously considering abortion, you're not ready to raise your child. End of story. Killing a pre-fetus is like wearing a condom. Except it's at a much later stage. There's nothing pessimistic or sadistic about my argument, and if you think so - you haven't bothered to understand it.
Mythbuster4ever
The killing part is. Whats wrong with adoption. My friend is adopted.
By masturbating you are killing sperm. So I guess that's wrong too?
Its like making a cake. Its coll to throw eggs at the wall, because they have not been combined with flour. But when you throw away cake batter you throw away goodness
Abortion is wrong, except in the cases which a mother's life is in danger, rape, or incest. Otherwise it is just a convenience issue. Don't want a baby? Don't have sex. it's that simple. I dont understand why people have a hard time figuring out when life begins. it's simple. once the embryo consumes energy to grow, it is living.
being adopted, i find it extremely unsettling that someone would have had the right to tell me i dont have the right to live. my birth parents considered abortion. im glad they chose otherwise but they have no right to say i die.
as for the "its her body" bullcrap, no not really. its two bodies. and you are responsible for the life you spread your legs to create. just give the kid up for adoption, there are plenty of people wanting a child who cant make their own. dont be so selfish. tee hee omg i wont get ta go partay n e more :( :( .....just DIAF.
I'm pro-life. That one child can grow up to be a brilliant person who may find cures for diseases or something else. It may be a slim chance, but there's still a chance.the_foreign_guy
Or on the other hand, you could end up with another Mussolini.
I'm pro-choice, but against abortion.
[QUOTE="D9-THC"]I wouldn't do it but I'd never tell somebody what to do with their body/life either.chrisrooR
me neither.
[QUOTE="D9-THC"]I wouldn't do it but I'd never tell somebody what to do with their body/life either.chrisrooR
me neither.
and here i thought all this time that it was a living thing inside her body connected to her by a small tube.
[QUOTE="chrisrooR"][QUOTE="D9-THC"]I wouldn't do it but I'd never tell somebody what to do with their body/life either.ItalStallion777
me neither.
and here i thought all this time that it was a living thing inside her body connected to her by a small tube.
Pro Choice. It's the woman's child, they should have the right to choose.JumpingMirrior
what about when it's born? it's still her child then. does that mean a mother can do whatever she want to her child just because it's hers? you make it sound like a child is property.
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]That's a terrible argument. Life is beautiful, but beauty is relative. A good example is how some people manage to believe that South Park is not the best show ever. Now, as far as that's concerned, women should be getting impregnated as much as possible so as to give birth to more souls to experience the joy of the intelligent vulgarity and often scathing insight South Park offers. The "life sucks anway, so you should kill them" is just a bad argument. Life doesn't suck, life rules, unless you're depressed. Get help. ANYWAY, also saying that a moment's hesitation means that you should automatically go all in is kind of saying that pretty much all our mothers' should've just gotten rid of us. Pregnancy is a scary thing. It's usually not something you're calm about, even if you're trying to precipitate it. That has nothing to do with how well the mother will raise her child.[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]Pro-Choice. If you are considering abortion in the first place, it'd be better for the child not to have lived at all unless you can guarentee him/her a life worth living. You pro-life guys act like life is amazing and your denying a child of it. That's not true at at all. Life is hell and sometimes it'd be better not to have that future baby born at all. GodLovesDead
If you're seriously considering abortion, you're not ready to raise your child. End of story. Killing a pre-fetus is like wearing a condom. Except it's at a much later stage. There's nothing pessimistic or sadistic about my argument, and if you think so - you haven't bothered to understand it.
I understand your argument. One moment of doubt does not mean for a lifetime of bad parenting or that a potential life should be extinguished.Potential life is endless. Do I even need to bring up the recent story of a baby found in a dumpster?
You just changed your argument. It was 'life sucks, so don't create more of it'.[QUOTE="D9-THC"]I wouldn't do it but I'd never tell somebody what to do with their body/life either.chrisrooR
me neither.
good. so you should be against abortioni think abortion should only be done under certain conditions(ex. failed protection/birth control, rape,mother's life is in danger). i also believe the decision should only be made the mother.
I also have a question related to the Bible. The Bible mentions several times that life is in the blood. (you can find this in the passages of Genesis 9:4, Leviticus 17:11 and 17:14, and Deuteronomy 12:23 all of the KJV). My question is, since the Bible says that life is in the blood and how there isn't a heartbeat or blood until around the third week of pregnancy, doesn't that mean that life does not begin at conception and that it is allowed in the bible to have an abortion within the first three weeks?
[QUOTE="chrisrooR"][QUOTE="D9-THC"]I wouldn't do it but I'd never tell somebody what to do with their body/life either.ItalStallion777
me neither.
and here i thought all this time that it was a living thing inside her body connected to her by a small tube.
every cell on your body is living and then dies. A fetus starts off as a cell and proceeds to grow. Every time you scratch your nose you have thousands of tiny abortions ;)
[QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="chrisrooR"][QUOTE="D9-THC"]I wouldn't do it but I'd never tell somebody what to do with their body/life either.chrisrooR
me neither.
and here i thought all this time that it was a living thing inside her body connected to her by a small tube.
every cell on your body is living and then dies. A fetus starts off as a cell and proceeds to grow. Every time you scratch your nose you have thousands of tiny abortions ;)
skin cells create babies? :shock:
if you can prove my nose will turn into a baby i'll stop scratching it.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment