Who agrees? Discuss. LOL
Legatus_Victix
I'm going to make a counter argument on par with this obviously masterful opening bid.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Who agrees? Discuss. LOL
Legatus_Victix
I'm going to make a counter argument on par with this obviously masterful opening bid.
NYC and Chicago can't really run the whole country, though perhaps they run the Senatorships and Electoral votes for New York State and Illinois. As well they should.[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]
idk why the NYC + Chicago crew haven't managed to rig the whole country yet from behind the curtains
the jews be slippin'
cowboy preachers are winning
whipassmt
Is freedom of speech now revoked, because last I checked this thread has nothing offensive to it. I simply implored to discuss. Unless, of course, people haven't been paying attention to statistics since he took office and are incapable of having a civil discussion about it. If you disagree, respectfully prove me wrong. Simple, no?
Legatus_Victix
It's hard to respectfully prove someone wrong when the initial argument is childish and stubborn.
you see, your argument is more of political sign that you might see at a rally rather than an actual argument consisting of reason and thoughtful consideration.Is freedom of speech now revoked, because last I checked this thread has nothing offensive to it. I simply implored to discuss. Unless, of course, people haven't been paying attention to statistics since he took office and are incapable of having a civil discussion about it. If you disagree, respectfully prove me wrong. Simple, no?
Legatus_Victix
TC -- I admire your chutzpah, but hate everything else I'm seeing here.
Too many posters have been here too long to find something like your OP (original post) amusing or interesting.
We KNOW some people feel Obama is driving this country in to the ground! THERE WERE FOUR TOPICS ON THIS YESTERDAY ALONE!
From now on I want you to CLEARLY spell our the rationale for your statements in the OP.
It should go like this:
"TOPIC TITLE"
OP:
Rationale 1
- supporting evidence 1
- supporting evidence 2
- supporting evidence 3
Rationale 2
- supporting evidence 1
- supporting evidence 2
et. cetera, et cetera.
ALSO!
Use quotations to back up your points and LINK your source(s) so readers can review and evaluate their validity. DON'T LINK WIKIPEDIA! IS THAT VALID? HELLO??
Tastefull (!!!) humor may be incorporated per TC preference but just flaunting it out their will no rationale (Or supporting evidence 1, or supporting evidence 2, etc.) is (frankly)juvenile and **WARNING PERSONAL OPINION!!** shows a lack of forethought.
And very important. Gotta source your claims otherwise it just comes off as unbased.TC -- I admire your chutzpah, but hate everything else I'm seeing here.
Too many posters have been here too long to find something like your OP (original post) amusing or interesting.
We KNOW some people feel Obama is driving this country in to the ground! THERE WERE FOUR TOPICS ON THIS YESTERDAY ALONE!
From now on I want you to CLEARLY spell our the rationale for your statements in the OP.
It should go like this:
"TOPIC TITLE"
OP:
Rationale 1
- supporting evidence 1
- supporting evidence 2
- supporting evidence 3
Rationale 2
- supporting evidence 1
- supporting evidence 2et. cetera, et cetera.
ALSO!
Use quotations to back up your points and LINK your source(s) so readers can review and evaluate their validity. DON'T LINK WIKIPEDIA! IS THAT VALID? HELLO??
Tastefull (!!!) humor may be incorporated per TC preference but just flaunting it out their will no rationale (Or supporting evidence 1, or supporting evidence 2, etc.) is (frankly)juvenile and **WARNING PERSONAL OPINION!!** shows a lack of forethought.
Meinhard1
How come anyone who speaks against Obama is automatically called a "racist" on forums and Facebook? I see nothing racist about TC's posts yet see individuals shouting accusations of racism. I think the human race has alot of growing up to do as far as respecting political and religious views.Socialist696I was being intentionally ridiculous. TC's initial post contained no substance whatsoever so I replied with another post with no real substance.
I was being intentionally ridiculous. TC's initial post contained no substance whatsoever so I replied with another post with no real substance. Oh alright well I stand corrected. Was quite a vibrant post, quite hard to follow everything that was said.[QUOTE="Socialist696"]How come anyone who speaks against Obama is automatically called a "racist" on forums and Facebook? I see nothing racist about TC's posts yet see individuals shouting accusations of racism. I think the human race has alot of growing up to do as far as respecting political and religious views.laughingman42
Yes he is a weak president I agree. No balls at all and he constantly gives in to Boehner. Its like he forgets that he was voted by the people! Put the pressure on the rebublicans and remind them that what he talked about in the debates is WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT! Be an ass Obama.
I think his latest fiscal cliff proposal was just such a statement.Yes he is a weak president I agree. No balls at all and he constantly gives in to Boehner. Its like he forgets that he was voted by the people! Put the pressure on the rebublicans and remind them that what he talked about in the debates is WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT! Be an ass Obama.
GrindingAxe
I think his latest fiscal cliff proposal was just such a statement. Your right...and Boehner won't budge. So Obama will fold as the deadline looms. Its supposed to be the Republicans who budge, but that won't happen. Hope I'm wrong.[QUOTE="GrindingAxe"]
Yes he is a weak president I agree. No balls at all and he constantly gives in to Boehner. Its like he forgets that he was voted by the people! Put the pressure on the rebublicans and remind them that what he talked about in the debates is WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT! Be an ass Obama.
Yusuke420
I think Obama is one of the strongest Presidents we've had since Bill Clinton. KHAndAnime
If you put it that way....
I dont know about weak, but I do feel like he hasnt done much in his first term and he is just the lesser of two evils wheit come to the last election.
I dont understand why america chooses thosses two people to choose as their president when they supposedly have a whole counrty of people to choose from.
I think Obama is one of the strongest Presidents we've had since Bill Clinton. KHAndAnimeWell we've only had Bush and Obama since Clinton. Not exactly much of a fight, its like arguing between Coke Zero and Diet Coke to me.
[QUOTE="Yusuke420"]I think his latest fiscal cliff proposal was just such a statement. Your right...and Boehner won't budge. So Obama will fold as the deadline looms. Its supposed to be the Republicans who budge, but that won't happen. Hope I'm wrong. Probably, which would be a really interesting development since he definitely has the most leverage given the circumstances. But the Tea Party faction and that Norquist pledge have really binded the Republican leadership's hands. I wouldn't be surprised if we went over the cliff and then retroactively passed "a new tax cut" that reimplemented most of the bush tax cuts.[QUOTE="GrindingAxe"]
Yes he is a weak president I agree. No balls at all and he constantly gives in to Boehner. Its like he forgets that he was voted by the people! Put the pressure on the rebublicans and remind them that what he talked about in the debates is WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT! Be an ass Obama.
GrindingAxe
[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"]I think Obama is one of the strongest Presidents we've had since Bill Clinton. Socialist696Well we've only had Bush and Obama since Clinton. Not exactly much of a fight, its like arguing between Coke Zero and Diet Coke to me.
I think Obama is one of the strongest Presidents we've had since Bill Clinton. KHAndAnime
lol we've only had Bush inbetween.
The OP probably not troll just hardcore conservative ranting. But really the country was in big mess before he came in power and major debt and problem before he came in power.
Bush ran high debt and big spending and the country was big mess. Also the unployment has gone done with Obama now than when he first took office.
Country is still in "big mess". Major debt? Check. Major problems? Check. High debt? Check^2. Big Spending? F*cking check. But it's a good thing Obama is in office again. or something. Fourth term of Bush, yay. Check.The OP probably not troll just hardcore conservative ranting. But really the country was in big mess before he came in power and major debt and problem before he came in power.
Bush ran high debt and big spending and the country was big mess. Also the unployment has gone done with Obama now than when he first took office.
Temesra
What would a "strong" president do differently? ZevianderMittens was going to sable rattle our way out of debt and the middle east lol. The GOP doesn't have any real solutions outside of giving "job creators" more tax breaks and hoping it trickles down (never does), but hey they'll still have their campaign donations so who cares about the poor when the GOP cuts TANF and SNAP to nothing?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment