If you have a device that can kill a person with a push of a button

[QUOTE="Namgis"]

[QUOTE="Bucked20"]Animal abusers......really Bucked20

Sure. What good is a human being if they torture and mutilate animals for fun?

[QUOTE="Bucked20"][QUOTE="Namgis"]

Sure. What good is a human being if they torture and mutilate animals for fun?

JohnF111

[QUOTE="JohnF111"][QUOTE="Bucked20"] So people who work in slaughterhouses should die for providing meat for usBucked20

Anyway, I would kill 0 people.

[QUOTE="Namgis"]

[QUOTE="Necrifer"]

who are you to decide who "deserves" to die though?

Fightingfan

I'm the one with the button. I decide my criteria. Just as you all would yours. In my book, rapists/pedophiles/animal abusers/mass murders are all deserving.

are you serious? it's a **** crime. having the desires, not a crime... but when you take actions that affect someone else it sure a **** is. you are taking a person at the most influential and vulnerable time in their life and completely changing who they will become because you can't control yourself. i don't see how anyone could possible argue that it's not a crime... 

[QUOTE="Bucked20"][QUOTE="JohnF111"] Yeah because everyone I know who works in a slaughterhouse does it for free because it's just so darn fun. :roll:Aljosa23

Anyway, I would kill 0 people.

Oh really 

they abuse animals so he has to include them Bucked20

Abuse.

Those that got the job solely to have the pleasure of killing the animals, then I would add them to the list. They most likely do it outside the workplace as well. Those that are working there because it's a job more than likely have no ill will towards the animals and actually feel bad for them. There is a difference.

Meat is murder!

[QUOTE="Namgis"]

Depends on the manner of selection. If I can just think to myself, "Kill every rapist alive today" and poof they're dead, I could deal with the moral consequences. If it's a one off and had to know the names of the targets, then I'd still probably do it. We all die. Why not speed the process up for those deserving souls?

MrPraline

Someone who will magically make money for making that decision.

i don't see how anyone could possible argue that it's not a crime... MuD3

[QUOTE="MuD3"]i don't see how anyone could possible argue that it's not a crime... Fightingfan

It is in the south.

[QUOTE="Bucked20"]they abuse animals so he has to include them Namgis

Abuse.

Those that got the job solely to have the pleasure of killing the animals, then I would add them to the list. They most likely do it outside the workplace as well. Those that are working there because it's a job more than likely have no ill will towards the animals and actually feel bad for them. There is a difference.

$1000? Zero times. If we were talking like 100000, then I'd do it once.

They dont feel sorry for them damn animals,they're mentally tough enough not to give a f*ck about them Bucked20

Either way, they're not enjoying it. Therefore no abuse.

Either way, they're not enjoying it. Therefore no abuse.

Namgis

That's not how it works.

[QUOTE="Namgis"]

Either way, they're not enjoying it. Therefore no abuse.

Necrifer

That's not how it works.

enlighten me. I'm willing to change my mind if the argument is strong.

[QUOTE="MuD3"]i don't see how anyone could possible argue that it's not a crime... Fightingfan

[QUOTE="Necrifer"]

[QUOTE="Namgis"]

Either way, they're not enjoying it. Therefore no abuse.

Namgis

That's not how it works.

enlighten me. I'm willing to change my mind if the argument is strong.

By the definition of abuse, you don't have to enjoy the act to be abusive.

You could say those people are not deserving of your wrath, which is entirely different than saying they are not abusive.

Meat is murder!

Necrifer

Tasty, tasty murder.

[QUOTE="Necrifer"]

Meat is murder!

applesxc47

Tasty, tasty murder.

I have to agree.

By the definition of abuse, you don't have to enjoy the act to be abusive.

You could say those people are not deserving of your wrath, which is entirely different than saying they are not abusive.

Necrifer

I'll give you the enjoyment aspect, but

Abuse

1. To use wrongly or improperly; misuse: abuse alcohol; abuse a privilege.
2. To hurt or injure by maltreatment; ill-use.

-

People who slaughter for a living, in general I'd assume, abide by the rules governing their occupation. They would not fall into either of those points.

That device is called a gun.

lol relevant

anyways for that kinda money it wouldn't even be hard to turn down.

[QUOTE="Necrifer"]

By the definition of abuse, you don't have to enjoy the act to be abusive.

You could say those people are not deserving of your wrath, which is entirely different than saying they are not abusive.

Namgis

I'll give you the enjoyment aspect, but

Abuse

1. To use wrongly or improperly; misuse: abuse alcohol; abuse a privilege.
2. To hurt or injure by maltreatment; ill-use.

-

People who slaughter for a living, in general I'd assume, abide by the rules governing their occupation. They would not fall into either of those points.

They could very well fall into definition 2.

To decide this we would have to ask "what is maltreatment?"

Maltreatment is defined as "cruel or inhumane treatment."

What goes on in a lot of slaughterhouses can be perceived as both cruel and inhumane.

That device is called a gun.

sonicare

*pull of a trigger

I wouldn't use it. 

Considering the amount of Taliban and al Qaeda members in existence that would be easy.ad1x2

Reminds of this extremely underrated movie.

What goes on in a lot of slaughterhouses can be perceived as both cruel and inhumane.

Necrifer

Those people wouldn't show up on my list. It's clear that we all have different views on what's what. I was just offering up mine to discuss.

If it's a matter of thought becoming reality, then my main concern would be for those that enjoy themselves when committing such acts. Since it's a grey area, I'm not dropping the hammer on them. I would need to study them before making such decisions. Thinking to oneself, 'kill all abusers' is far to vague, it would have to be more direct and succinct. 'Kill those who willfully and with sound mind and forethought commit 'X' act".

.

Id use it on anyone that gets in my way or bothers me in the slightet, or anyone that looks at me, or causes me to wait in line, or speaks to me.. infact, id use it on pretty much anyone and everyone.. and not for the money, just to get them out of my way. well not really but just imagine the possibilities. 

Does it come with a shinigami?

I can say I'd kill all these bad people but when the time actually came I don't know if I'd have the Cojones to do it. The guilt would most likely tear me apart no matter how bad of a person they are.

Animals killed in slaughterhouses are put down humanely and don't suffer.Aljosa23

Yeah. 10,000 times at least. But only on rapists, murders, terrorists and other bigots.TheWalkingGhost

Such a device would give me carpal tunnel syndrome.

:|

and you get $1000 everytime you use it to kill someone, how many people would you kill? You can pick the people you want dead. Lonelynight

Yep I would be pretty rich.

Rich enough to actually uplift the lives of those I don't kill(Africa I'm looking at you;) ).

I would love to have one of those.

Such a device would give me carpal tunnel syndrome.

:|

 

Stesilaus

Depends on if I'm able to choose who can go...

If so, I can easily get it passed $20,000 or more....

Depends on if I'm able to choose who can go...

If so, I can easily get it passed $20,000 or more....

tocool340

I would destroy all humans on my deathbed.