If an unstoppable force meets an immovable object, what happens?

im guessing that once they meet its starts a never ending transfer of energy ... im still not sure what do you guys think?HookedOnKiLLing

isnt that how the universe was createdleonard88

The unstoppable force meets the immovable object and the universe shifts to the same speed unstoppable force, keeping the immovable force not moving as it has the reference point moving with itself, making it not moving. The unstoppable force is going the same speed as before which means it is still moving. They are moving, but not moving.brandontwb

uhhhh what..

Religion Threadsthriteenthmonke

what about religion?

Ask Batman and The Joker. It happened.3eyedrazorback

lol thats actually where i get the idea from..

[QUOTE="thriteenthmonke"]Religion ThreadsHookedOnKiLLing

what about religion?

By the definition of either alone, one cannot exist if the other does.
Meaning, if you have a TRULY unstoppable force, then you cannot have an immovable object. Because if its immovable, then the unstoppable force isn't unstoppable, is it? And vice versa.

The existance of one destroys the possibility/definition of the other.

And we currently live in a reality with an irristable force: the ever expanding universe.

If there was ever such a thing as an unstoppable force, then it's impossible to have an immovable object if they're in the same universe. So it's impossible and cannot be answered.the_foreign_guy

[QUOTE="leonard88"]isnt that how the universe was creatednVidiaGaMer

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"][QUOTE="leonard88"]isnt that how the universe was createdleonard88

You get aids. CleanPlayer

[QUOTE="leonard88"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"] What if the universe had no beginning and is infinite and was always there. Didn't think of that?brandontwb

[QUOTE="leonard88"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"] What if the universe had no beginning and is infinite and was always there. Didn't think of that?brandontwb

You people should read "A Brief History of Time" by Stephan Hawking. It's a nice place to start if you're actually interested in these types of questions.

[QUOTE="brandontwb"][QUOTE="leonard88"] yet how could something be there without a beginning leonard88

[QUOTE="brandontwb"]The unstoppable force meets the immovable object and the universe shifts to the same speed unstoppable force, keeping the immovable force not moving as it has the reference point moving with itself, making it not moving. The unstoppable force is going the same speed as before which means it is still moving. They are moving, but not moving.HookedOnKiLLing

uhhhh what..

[QUOTE="brandontwb"][QUOTE="leonard88"] yet how could something be there without a beginning Packt

You people should read "A Brief History of Time" by Stephan Hawking. It's a nice place to start if you're actually interested in these types of questions.

It's an impossible situation because the universe does not deal in such absolutes. Basically, there is no such thing as either.allnamestaken

[QUOTE="leonard88"][QUOTE="brandontwb"]How could something have a beginning if there was nothing?brandontwb

[QUOTE="brandontwb"][QUOTE="leonard88"] the unstoppable force +immovable object=universeleonard88

how did that beginning start then without something before it to create it?

The unstoppable force meets the immovable object and they stay together. The universe shifts to the same speed as the unstoppable moving object. The unstoppable force has not changed speed to the observer; it is still moving. The immovable force is staying in the same position because the universe, it's reference point is going the same speed, and keeping the immovable object in the same position. They are moving, but not moving. Problem solved.brandontwb

You get aids. CleanPlayer

I lol'd

By the definition of either alone, one cannot exist if the other does.
Meaning, if you have a TRULY unstoppable force, then you cannot have an immovable object. Because if its immovable, then the unstoppable force isn't unstoppable, is it? And vice versa.

The existance of one destroys the possibility/definition of the other.

And we currently live in a reality with an irristable force: the ever expanding universe.flazzle

Either nothing at all (the force goes through the object like a ghost or something like that) or a disaster of inimaginable proportions.

By the definition of either alone, one cannot exist if the other does.
Meaning, if you have a TRULY unstoppable force, then you cannot have an immovable object. Because if its immovable, then the unstoppable force isn't unstoppable, is it? And vice versa.

The existance of one destroys the possibility/definition of the other.

And we currently live in a reality with an irristable force: the ever expanding universe.flazzle

The expansion of space-time is not a force! It is a property of our universe.

Religion Threadsthriteenthmonke