That's not how the U.N. works, there is very little discussion and more forced upon policys. Half the cultures of around near half the U.N. members are deemed illegal under dictator law under the U.N. It's more like a person screaming they like icecream on 4 chan when they just post batman memes. There coice only matter little. There is no equality in the U.N. and only around 5-7 countries actually make the decisions which as seen before mostly by the U.S. and UK, do not require some of these countries even knowing until after the fact. you are defending Dictational Communistic Anarchy.[QUOTE="PresidentKing"][QUOTE="C2N2"]
That would occur regardless of the UN, at least with the UN minor nations and great nations alike have a forum to discuss ways to better society, whether they do anything or not is irrelevant... At least some effort is made.
C2N2
Like I said though, those 5-7 "supreme" countries would be in such a situation regardless... You act like the UN gives them power over lesser countries when they would have that power over them no matter what...
The UN still does more...
- There are hundreds of thousands of UN Peacekeepers rotated in and out of missions throughout Africa and the Middle East.
- Not to mention UNDP, UNESCO, etc...
The UN track record has more innocents killed than the baddies. Also no, it would not end up like that regardless. People not in the UN can be taken over, people in the Un that are not the big 5-7 are opressed by them, are forced to obey "international' laws which some purposely target cultures of certain countries and traditions. Randomly going in and doing illegal activities is waved for the big 5-7, but for others it's a penalty of doom. It's unorganized and balanced, and it basically has only few controlling the thing and in turn controling hw the world works resulting in endless conflicts. You have no idea what you are defending.
Log in to comment