Does America have Weapons of Mass Destruction??

  • 140 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for The_Smart_Idiot
The_Smart_Idiot

1888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 The_Smart_Idiot
Member since 2005 • 1888 Posts

Im wondering this myself..

I have a strong feeling

America has WMDs - perhaps we should insist on sending inspectors into the US before anywhere else.

Avatar image for rudyfan04
rudyfan04

4448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#2 rudyfan04
Member since 2004 • 4448 Posts
Yes we do, it's not a secret
Avatar image for lVIrNguyen
lVIrNguyen

1822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 lVIrNguyen
Member since 2006 • 1822 Posts
yes we do Bush + 999999999999999999999999 bean burritoes = the most massive nuclear toxic weapon ever! it's even worst than mustard gas :D
Avatar image for Dark__Link
Dark__Link

32653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Dark__Link
Member since 2003 • 32653 Posts
[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]
Avatar image for MistaMike54
MistaMike54

6417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 MistaMike54
Member since 2005 • 6417 Posts

It's pretty open that we do...we just don't want to start anything, but if someone else does, we are more than ready...with the bombs at least.

Avatar image for MiniGuns
MiniGuns

7295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#6 MiniGuns
Member since 2005 • 7295 Posts
yes we do every American has one.
Avatar image for Hellraiser3899
Hellraiser3899

10060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#7 Hellraiser3899
Member since 2005 • 10060 Posts
yeah we do... still pretty well stocked up from the cold war.
Avatar image for yermomsboxx
yermomsboxx

6348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 yermomsboxx
Member since 2005 • 6348 Posts
We can obviously be trusted with them. Letting people with towels on their heads have them is morally and ethically wrong, though. Those people are sketchy and shouldn't be trusted.Dark__Link
Uh, right!
Avatar image for Click_Clock
Click_Clock

3632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Click_Clock
Member since 2005 • 3632 Posts

Im wondering this myself..

I have a strong feeling

America has WMDs - perhaps we should insist on sending inspectors into the US before anywhere else.

The_Smart_Idiot
Dude of course America has weapons of mass destruction, they're the world's super power. Unlike its poor neighbor to the north (canada) and to the south (mexico) those country pathetic economy can't afford them to get jack. And if you read, you would know that Americans had weapons of mass destruction since WWII.
Avatar image for ddawg2030
ddawg2030

4110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 ddawg2030
Member since 2003 • 4110 Posts
What the hell kinda question is that? We have over 2000 nukes stockpiled somewhere in Ohio.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178895 Posts
Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?
Avatar image for Griff767
Griff767

2254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#12 Griff767
Member since 2006 • 2254 Posts
We can obviously be trusted with them. Letting people with towels on their heads have them is morally and ethically wrong, though. Those people are sketchy and shouldn't be trusted.Dark__Link


Wow racist
Avatar image for STWELCH
STWELCH

4805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 STWELCH
Member since 2005 • 4805 Posts

[QUOTE="Dark__Link"]We can obviously be trusted with them. Letting people with towels on their heads have them is morally and ethically wrong, though. Those people are sketchy and shouldn't be trusted.Griff767


Wow racist

It was sarcasm.

Avatar image for Dark__Link
Dark__Link

32653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Dark__Link
Member since 2003 • 32653 Posts
[QUOTE="Dark__Link"]We can obviously be trusted with them. Letting people with towels on their heads have them is morally and ethically wrong, though. Those people are sketchy and shouldn't be trusted.Griff767


Wow racist

:| You can't be serious...
Avatar image for sdasilva98
sdasilva98

124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 sdasilva98
Member since 2006 • 124 Posts
Of corse we do it's no secret but the UN trusts us with them
Avatar image for The_Smart_Idiot
The_Smart_Idiot

1888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 The_Smart_Idiot
Member since 2005 • 1888 Posts

Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?LJS9502_basic

How come we get to invade Iraq?

Avatar image for villa4europe
villa4europe

7081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 villa4europe
Member since 2004 • 7081 Posts

We can obviously be trusted with them. Letting people with towels on their heads have them is morally and ethically wrong, though. Those people are sketchy and shouldn't be trusted.Dark__Link

you have just answered the question in the other thread "why do people hate americans"

Avatar image for CaptHawkeye
CaptHawkeye

13977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 CaptHawkeye
Member since 2004 • 13977 Posts
That's what everybody likes to think anyway. But in reality, the US doesn't have nukes. In fact, the entire US is just a massive cover up for neo global canadian revolution! You see, it's really us Canadians that have the nukes. The US just pretends to have them for us.... We've been lieing in wait for 200 years mother ****ers! And soon, this world will be ours. :twisted:
Avatar image for sdasilva98
sdasilva98

124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 sdasilva98
Member since 2006 • 124 Posts
[QUOTE="Griff767"][QUOTE="Dark__Link"]We can obviously be trusted with them. Letting people with towels on their heads have them is morally and ethically wrong, though. Those people are sketchy and shouldn't be trusted.Dark__Link


Wow racist

:| You can't be serious...


That was kinda racist
Avatar image for ddawg2030
ddawg2030

4110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 ddawg2030
Member since 2003 • 4110 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?The_Smart_Idiot

How come we get to invade Iraq?


Oh come on, how can you not figure it out? People trust us with nukes, but with a ruler like saddam, they couldn't trust him. Seriously, do you think about this stuff or do you just let your hands do the work?
Avatar image for curono
curono

7722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#22 curono
Member since 2005 • 7722 Posts
Of course USA has lots of WMD`s, but isrealians are  the  devil in flesh for triying to construct ONE :roll:
Avatar image for Hellraiser3899
Hellraiser3899

10060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#23 Hellraiser3899
Member since 2005 • 10060 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?The_Smart_Idiot

How come we get to invade Iraq?

Because Bush thought that he could be trusted with nukes and Saddam couldn't.
Avatar image for Dark__Link
Dark__Link

32653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Dark__Link
Member since 2003 • 32653 Posts
[QUOTE="Dark__Link"][QUOTE="Griff767"][QUOTE="Dark__Link"]We can obviously be trusted with them. Letting people with towels on their heads have them is morally and ethically wrong, though. Those people are sketchy and shouldn't be trusted.sdasilva98


Wow racist

:| You can't be serious...


That was kinda racist

Why is it that I try to have fun with some light sarcasm and everyone thinks I'm a racist douchebag?
Avatar image for compaq345682
compaq345682

6326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 compaq345682
Member since 2004 • 6326 Posts
Well the U.S.A. does have WMD's but everyone is too scared to question our authorty at the risk of being "liberated":lol:
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178895 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?The_Smart_Idiot

How come we get to invade Iraq?

We can be trusted....unstable countries...not so much.

Avatar image for villa4europe
villa4europe

7081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 villa4europe
Member since 2004 • 7081 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Smart_Idiot"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?ddawg2030

How come we get to invade Iraq?


Oh come on, how can you not figure it out? People trust us with nukes, but with a ruler like saddam, they couldn't trust him. Seriously, do you think about this stuff or do you just let your hands do the work?

logic tells me that there is only 1 country in the world who could realistically try and conquer it, and it aint iraq

no one can be trusted with WMD, no one needs them

Avatar image for ddawg2030
ddawg2030

4110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 ddawg2030
Member since 2003 • 4110 Posts
[QUOTE="sdasilva98"][QUOTE="Dark__Link"][QUOTE="Griff767"][QUOTE="Dark__Link"]We can obviously be trusted with them. Letting people with towels on their heads have them is morally and ethically wrong, though. Those people are sketchy and shouldn't be trusted.Dark__Link


Wow racist

:| You can't be serious...


That was kinda racist

Why is it that I try to have fun with some light sarcasm and everyone thinks I'm a racist douchebag?


Okay, I can't tell the difference between joking and seriousness when someone calls me 'goth' just because I am a Satanist and I've gotten a numb sense of sarcasm from all the mindless religion debates, but even I can tell this guy wasn't serious.
Avatar image for Decessus
Decessus

5132

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: -5

#29 Decessus
Member since 2003 • 5132 Posts
[QUOTE="Dark__Link"] Why is it that I try to have fun with some light sarcasm and everyone thinks I'm a racist douchebag?

If you don't want people to think you are a racist, then don't use language that is going to portray you one.
Avatar image for jimihendrix833
jimihendrix833

964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 jimihendrix833
Member since 2006 • 964 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Smart_Idiot"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?LJS9502_basic

How come we get to invade Iraq?

We can be trusted....unstable countries...not so much.

and the fact we don't invade other countrys unless they attack us
Avatar image for STWELCH
STWELCH

4805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 STWELCH
Member since 2005 • 4805 Posts

[QUOTE="Dark__Link"] Why is it that I try to have fun with some light sarcasm and everyone thinks I'm a racist douchebag?Decessus
If you don't want people to think you are a racist, then don't use language that is going to portray you one.

Or you could show some intelligence and pick up on the sarcasm.

Avatar image for Hellraiser3899
Hellraiser3899

10060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#32 Hellraiser3899
Member since 2005 • 10060 Posts
[QUOTE="ddawg2030"] [QUOTE="The_Smart_Idiot"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?villa4europe

How come we get to invade Iraq?


Oh come on, how can you not figure it out? People trust us with nukes, but with a ruler like saddam, they couldn't trust him. Seriously, do you think about this stuff or do you just let your hands do the work?

logic tells me that there is only 1 country in the world who could realistically try and conquer it, and it aint iraq

no one can be trusted with WMD, no one needs them

Best answer so far.
Avatar image for ak618
ak618

1242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 ak618
Member since 2005 • 1242 Posts
smh i wouldn't doubt it
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178895 Posts
[QUOTE="villa4europe"][QUOTE="ddawg2030"] [QUOTE="The_Smart_Idiot"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?Hellraiser3899

How come we get to invade Iraq?


Oh come on, how can you not figure it out? People trust us with nukes, but with a ruler like saddam, they couldn't trust him. Seriously, do you think about this stuff or do you just let your hands do the work?

logic tells me that there is only 1 country in the world who could realistically try and conquer it, and it aint iraq

no one can be trusted with WMD, no one needs them

Best answer so far.

Not really.....once the capability is there the weapons will be there.  So in order to prevent some crazy leader from using it there has to be a consequence to that action.  Ie....another country has to have them....

You know life is not as simplistic as tv would have you believe.

Avatar image for fidosim
fidosim

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#35 fidosim
Member since 2003 • 12901 Posts

No.

We have weapons of righteousness.

Avatar image for solidsnakeEx3
solidsnakeEx3

26413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#36 solidsnakeEx3
Member since 2004 • 26413 Posts
No duh.  We have thousands of nukes, and several long range missles.  The military used White Phosphorous in Fallujah, technically it's not a WMD but it acts in the same way (Chemical weapon technically, burns skin and such)

America has ways to get around Geneva.  There are ridiculously powerful sniper rifles that are banned from Geneva.  However, the US still uses them, as "equipment destroying" rifles, to destroy downed mortars and such.  Soldiers can use them against enemy troops because a troop's jacket, helmet, etc counts as equipment.
Avatar image for compaq345682
compaq345682

6326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#37 compaq345682
Member since 2004 • 6326 Posts
[QUOTE="Hellraiser3899"][QUOTE="villa4europe"][QUOTE="ddawg2030"] [QUOTE="The_Smart_Idiot"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?LJS9502_basic

How come we get to invade Iraq?


Oh come on, how can you not figure it out? People trust us with nukes, but with a ruler like saddam, they couldn't trust him. Seriously, do you think about this stuff or do you just let your hands do the work?

logic tells me that there is only 1 country in the world who could realistically try and conquer it, and it aint iraq

no one can be trusted with WMD, no one needs them

Best answer so far.

Not really.....once the capability is there the weapons will be there. So in order to prevent some crazy leader from using it there has to be a consequence to that action. Ie....another country has to have them....

You know life is not as simplistic as tv would have you believe.



Well we could jus destroy them all and kill anyone who decides to keep em there yah go real simple.
Avatar image for villa4europe
villa4europe

7081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 villa4europe
Member since 2004 • 7081 Posts
[QUOTE="Hellraiser3899"][QUOTE="villa4europe"][QUOTE="ddawg2030"] [QUOTE="The_Smart_Idiot"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?LJS9502_basic

How come we get to invade Iraq?


Oh come on, how can you not figure it out? People trust us with nukes, but with a ruler like saddam, they couldn't trust him. Seriously, do you think about this stuff or do you just let your hands do the work?

logic tells me that there is only 1 country in the world who could realistically try and conquer it, and it aint iraq

no one can be trusted with WMD, no one needs them

Best answer so far.

Not really.....once the capability is there the weapons will be there.  So in order to prevent some crazy leader from using it there has to be a consequence to that action.  Ie....another country has to have them....

You know life is not as simplistic as tv would have you believe.

and who had and used them first...

was he a crazy leader?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178895 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Hellraiser3899"][QUOTE="villa4europe"][QUOTE="ddawg2030"] [QUOTE="The_Smart_Idiot"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?villa4europe

How come we get to invade Iraq?


Oh come on, how can you not figure it out? People trust us with nukes, but with a ruler like saddam, they couldn't trust him. Seriously, do you think about this stuff or do you just let your hands do the work?

logic tells me that there is only 1 country in the world who could realistically try and conquer it, and it aint iraq

no one can be trusted with WMD, no one needs them

Best answer so far.

Not really.....once the capability is there the weapons will be there.  So in order to prevent some crazy leader from using it there has to be a consequence to that action.  Ie....another country has to have them....

You know life is not as simplistic as tv would have you believe.

and who had and used them first...

was he a crazy leader?

My point, which you didn't pick up on, was that once the capability is there it's too late to start whining about countries having them.  They do.  Deal. 

To make an omelette you have to break a few eggs:wink:

Avatar image for ddawg2030
ddawg2030

4110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 ddawg2030
Member since 2003 • 4110 Posts
[QUOTE="compaq345682"]
[QUOTE="Hellraiser3899"][QUOTE="villa4europe"][QUOTE="ddawg2030"] [QUOTE="The_Smart_Idiot"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?LJS9502_basic

How come we get to invade Iraq?


Oh come on, how can you not figure it out? People trust us with nukes, but with a ruler like saddam, they couldn't trust him. Seriously, do you think about this stuff or do you just let your hands do the work?

logic tells me that there is only 1 country in the world who could realistically try and conquer it, and it aint iraq

no one can be trusted with WMD, no one needs them

Best answer so far.

Not really.....once the capability is there the weapons will be there. So in order to prevent some crazy leader from using it there has to be a consequence to that action. Ie....another country has to have them....

You know life is not as simplistic as tv would have you believe.



Well we could jus destroy them all and kill anyone who decides to keep em there yah go real simple.


I don't see why we can't have nukes, I mean the nuke on Hiroshima was a hell of better thing to do than send troops in.
Avatar image for Hellraiser3899
Hellraiser3899

10060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#41 Hellraiser3899
Member since 2005 • 10060 Posts
[QUOTE="Hellraiser3899"][QUOTE="villa4europe"][QUOTE="ddawg2030"] [QUOTE="The_Smart_Idiot"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?LJS9502_basic

How come we get to invade Iraq?


Oh come on, how can you not figure it out? People trust us with nukes, but with a ruler like saddam, they couldn't trust him. Seriously, do you think about this stuff or do you just let your hands do the work?

logic tells me that there is only 1 country in the world who could realistically try and conquer it, and it aint iraq

no one can be trusted with WMD, no one needs them

Best answer so far.

Not really.....once the capability is there the weapons will be there.  So in order to prevent some crazy leader from using it there has to be a consequence to that action.  Ie....another country has to have them....

You know life is not as simplistic as tv would have you believe.

Well its only other purpose other than the obvious is for political pressure... though that doesn't seem to be much of a deterence to some nations.
Avatar image for trix5817
trix5817

12252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 trix5817
Member since 2004 • 12252 Posts
Most of them are all left over from the cold war. A lot of nations on the UN do I believe.
Avatar image for villa4europe
villa4europe

7081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 villa4europe
Member since 2004 • 7081 Posts
[QUOTE="compaq345682"] [QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Hellraiser3899"][QUOTE="villa4europe"][QUOTE="ddawg2030"] [QUOTE="The_Smart_Idiot"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?ddawg2030

How come we get to invade Iraq?


Oh come on, how can you not figure it out? People trust us with nukes, but with a ruler like saddam, they couldn't trust him. Seriously, do you think about this stuff or do you just let your hands do the work?

logic tells me that there is only 1 country in the world who could realistically try and conquer it, and it aint iraq

no one can be trusted with WMD, no one needs them

Best answer so far.

Not really.....once the capability is there the weapons will be there. So in order to prevent some crazy leader from using it there has to be a consequence to that action. Ie....another country has to have them....

You know life is not as simplistic as tv would have you believe.



Well we could jus destroy them all and kill anyone who decides to keep em there yah go real simple.


I don't see why we can't have nukes, I mean the nuke on Hiroshima was a hell of better thing to do than send troops in.

do you think the japanese agree?

Avatar image for trix5817
trix5817

12252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 trix5817
Member since 2004 • 12252 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?The_Smart_Idiot

How come we get to invade Iraq?



Because Saddam Hussein is crazy, and has used chemical weapons on his OWN people before.
Avatar image for ddawg2030
ddawg2030

4110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 ddawg2030
Member since 2003 • 4110 Posts
[QUOTE="ddawg2030"] [QUOTE="compaq345682"] [QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Hellraiser3899"][QUOTE="villa4europe"][QUOTE="ddawg2030"] [QUOTE="The_Smart_Idiot"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?villa4europe

How come we get to invade Iraq?


Oh come on, how can you not figure it out? People trust us with nukes, but with a ruler like saddam, they couldn't trust him. Seriously, do you think about this stuff or do you just let your hands do the work?

logic tells me that there is only 1 country in the world who could realistically try and conquer it, and it aint iraq

no one can be trusted with WMD, no one needs them

Best answer so far.

Not really.....once the capability is there the weapons will be there. So in order to prevent some crazy leader from using it there has to be a consequence to that action. Ie....another country has to have them....

You know life is not as simplistic as tv would have you believe.



Well we could jus destroy them all and kill anyone who decides to keep em there yah go real simple.


I don't see why we can't have nukes, I mean the nuke on Hiroshima was a hell of better thing to do than send troops in.

do you think the japanese agree?


Would you rather have them die painful deaths while loosing around a million of our troops and have it known to be an inhumane genocide instead of just dropping a nuke and making it quick and painless? It's your choice, pain, or no pain, but you have to die anyway, I'd go with no pain. Regardless, it had to be done.
Avatar image for Decessus
Decessus

5132

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: -5

#46 Decessus
Member since 2003 • 5132 Posts
Or you could show some intelligence and pick up on the sarcasm.

STWELCH

Whether it was sarcasm or not is irrelevant. It was still racist. You can't make derogatory comment about an entire group of people, and then say I was only kidding.

Avatar image for Hellraiser3899
Hellraiser3899

10060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#47 Hellraiser3899
Member since 2005 • 10060 Posts
[QUOTE="ddawg2030"] [QUOTE="compaq345682"] [QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Hellraiser3899"][QUOTE="villa4europe"][QUOTE="ddawg2030"] [QUOTE="The_Smart_Idiot"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?villa4europe

How come we get to invade Iraq?


Oh come on, how can you not figure it out? People trust us with nukes, but with a ruler like saddam, they couldn't trust him. Seriously, do you think about this stuff or do you just let your hands do the work?

logic tells me that there is only 1 country in the world who could realistically try and conquer it, and it aint iraq

no one can be trusted with WMD, no one needs them

Best answer so far.

Not really.....once the capability is there the weapons will be there. So in order to prevent some crazy leader from using it there has to be a consequence to that action. Ie....another country has to have them....

You know life is not as simplistic as tv would have you believe.



Well we could jus destroy them all and kill anyone who decides to keep em there yah go real simple.


I don't see why we can't have nukes, I mean the nuke on Hiroshima was a hell of better thing to do than send troops in.

do you think the japanese agree?

Casualties estamites for the X-day invasion were as high as 1 million american and 3-5 million japanese... mabye they would.
Avatar image for F1Lengend
F1Lengend

7909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 F1Lengend
Member since 2005 • 7909 Posts
my god.."ya people trust us with NUKES" do you know what nukes do..ya people trust us with nukes....we use them as paint thinner....a nuke is a nuke...americans are hypocritacal.
Avatar image for solidsnakeEx3
solidsnakeEx3

26413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#49 solidsnakeEx3
Member since 2004 • 26413 Posts
[QUOTE="ddawg2030"] [QUOTE="compaq345682"] [QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Hellraiser3899"][QUOTE="villa4europe"][QUOTE="ddawg2030"] [QUOTE="The_Smart_Idiot"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?villa4europe

How come we get to invade Iraq?


Oh come on, how can you not figure it out? People trust us with nukes, but with a ruler like saddam, they couldn't trust him. Seriously, do you think about this stuff or do you just let your hands do the work?

logic tells me that there is only 1 country in the world who could realistically try and conquer it, and it aint iraq

no one can be trusted with WMD, no one needs them

Best answer so far.

Not really.....once the capability is there the weapons will be there. So in order to prevent some crazy leader from using it there has to be a consequence to that action. Ie....another country has to have them....

You know life is not as simplistic as tv would have you believe.



Well we could jus destroy them all and kill anyone who decides to keep em there yah go real simple.


I don't see why we can't have nukes, I mean the nuke on Hiroshima was a hell of better thing to do than send troops in.

do you think the japanese agree?


Japan was one case where nukes were probably the way to go.  For one, Japan's government had control over the Japanese people.  The majority of Japanese were for the war, and nationalistic, taught to defend the homeland.  If the US sent troops, many more civilians would die fighting.  And the US would've went for total control, not a raid and retreat


Avatar image for fidosim
fidosim

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#50 fidosim
Member since 2003 • 12901 Posts
[QUOTE="ddawg2030"] [QUOTE="compaq345682"] [QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Hellraiser3899"][QUOTE="villa4europe"][QUOTE="ddawg2030"] [QUOTE="The_Smart_Idiot"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Dude are you serious....how do you not know this?villa4europe

How come we get to invade Iraq?


Oh come on, how can you not figure it out? People trust us with nukes, but with a ruler like saddam, they couldn't trust him. Seriously, do you think about this stuff or do you just let your hands do the work?

logic tells me that there is only 1 country in the world who could realistically try and conquer it, and it aint iraq

no one can be trusted with WMD, no one needs them

Best answer so far.

Not really.....once the capability is there the weapons will be there. So in order to prevent some crazy leader from using it there has to be a consequence to that action. Ie....another country has to have them....

You know life is not as simplistic as tv would have you believe.



Well we could jus destroy them all and kill anyone who decides to keep em there yah go real simple.


I don't see why we can't have nukes, I mean the nuke on Hiroshima was a hell of better thing to do than send troops in.

do you think the japanese agree?

Probably.  It beats losing another 2 million Japanese lives in an invasion.