Do u accept g@y marriage?

[QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"]Being a light unto the world is part of my faith afterall... We are supposed to be able to do that. (not point fingers but lead people to holiness in love)mindstorm

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="mindstorm"]

[QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"][QUOTE="ferrari2001"]No I'm against it, Marriage has been a religious union for thousands of years and the gov't wants to feel special and tell us what marriage it. Since Most religions are against Gay marriage it shouldn't be allowed. If you don't have religions you should just be allowed to live together. Why should their be special treatments for married people in the first place?mindstorm

I see the point in that as a future pastor I will be uniting people in marriage under God. I will refuse to do not only homosexual marriages but also marriages between unbelievers, even if only one of them is not a believer.

do you think athiest heterosexuals should also not be permitted to marry?

but if you could vote on it, would you permit it?

[QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"]

[QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"][QUOTE="ferrari2001"]No I'm against it, Marriage has been a religious union for thousands of years and the gov't wants to feel special and tell us what marriage it. Since Most religions are against Gay marriage it shouldn't be allowed. If you don't have religions you should just be allowed to live together. Why should their be special treatments for married people in the first place?yoshi-lnex

I see the point in that as a future pastor I will be uniting people in marriage under God. I will refuse to do not only homosexual marriages but also marriages between unbelievers, even if only one of them is not a believer.

One way of loving thy neighbor is leading them down the path of righteousness. Sexual immorality is not a path of righteousness...
mindstorm

[QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"][QUOTE="Silenthps"]Nope. Gays shouldn't have the special right to change the deffinition of a word that was not intended for them to use. Silenthps

[QUOTE="zombiefruit"]Jesus Christ was homosexual, but no one knew.mindstorm

[QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="mindstorm"]

[QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"][QUOTE="ferrari2001"]No I'm against it, Marriage has been a religious union for thousands of years and the gov't wants to feel special and tell us what marriage it. Since Most religions are against Gay marriage it shouldn't be allowed. If you don't have religions you should just be allowed to live together. Why should their be special treatments for married people in the first place?comp_atkins

I see the point in that as a future pastor I will be uniting people in marriage under God. I will refuse to do not only homosexual marriages but also marriages between unbelievers, even if only one of them is not a believer.

do you think athiest heterosexuals should also not be permitted to marry?

but if you could vote on it, would you permit it?

[QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"]Being a light unto the world is part of my faith afterall... We are supposed to be able to do that. (not point fingers but lead people to holiness in love)yoshi-lnex

[QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"]Being a light unto the world is part of my faith afterall... We are supposed to be able to do that. (not point fingers but lead people to holiness in love)mindstorm

[QUOTE="legend26"][QUOTE="mindstorm"]

[QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"][QUOTE="ferrari2001"]No I'm against it, Marriage has been a religious union for thousands of years and the gov't wants to feel special and tell us what marriage it. Since Most religions are against Gay marriage it shouldn't be allowed. If you don't have religions you should just be allowed to live together. Why should their be special treatments for married people in the first place?mindstorm

I see the point in that as a future pastor I will be uniting people in marriage under God. I will refuse to do not only homosexual marriages but also marriages between unbelievers, even if only one of them is not a believer.

god wants love in the earth, so i dont think he really cares if its with two guys or girls. its only man who twisted that vision...

[QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="zombiefruit"]Jesus Christ was homosexual, but no one knew.deepdreamer256

[QUOTE="yoshi-lnex"][QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"]Being a light unto the world is part of my faith afterall... We are supposed to be able to do that. (not point fingers but lead people to holiness in love)mindstorm

[QUOTE="zombiefruit"]Jesus Christ was homosexual, but no one knew.mindstorm

Because I'm god. But seriously, he could have been.

Does the topic maker not know how to speak English?

What does G@Y mean?

A@

[QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"]Being a light unto the world is part of my faith afterall... We are supposed to be able to do that. (not point fingers but lead people to holiness in love)yoshi-lnex

[QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="legend26"][QUOTE="mindstorm"]

[QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"][QUOTE="ferrari2001"]No I'm against it, Marriage has been a religious union for thousands of years and the gov't wants to feel special and tell us what marriage it. Since Most religions are against Gay marriage it shouldn't be allowed. If you don't have religions you should just be allowed to live together. Why should their be special treatments for married people in the first place?legend26

I see the point in that as a future pastor I will be uniting people in marriage under God. I will refuse to do not only homosexual marriages but also marriages between unbelievers, even if only one of them is not a believer.

god wants love in the earth, so i dont think he really cares if its with two guys or girls. its only man who twisted that vision...

You have a very poor view of the Bible if you believe that is what God cares about...

Does the topic maker not know how to speak English?

ParadiseAwaits

Gay is a censored word when making topic titles.

[QUOTE="ParadiseAwaits"]

Does the topic maker not know how to speak English?

Blood-Scribe

Gay is a censored word when making topic titles.

Why? That word is not offensive.

1 a: happily excited :merry b: keenly alive and exuberant : having or inducing high spirits

Having high spirits on Gamespot is obviously extrememly offensive to moderators. ;)

[QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="yoshi-lnex"][QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"]Being a light unto the world is part of my faith afterall... We are supposed to be able to do that. (not point fingers but lead people to holiness in love)yoshi-lnex

I do not think the church handles homosexuals in the way it should however.

[QUOTE="yoshi-lnex"][QUOTE="yoshi-lnex"][QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"]Being a light unto the world is part of my faith afterall... We are supposed to be able to do that. (not point fingers but lead people to holiness in love)mindstorm

I do not think the church handles homosexuals in the way it should however.

You used the morality of the Bible as an argument against me and then say it's not right? Make up your mind as to whether or not I should follow what it says....You have a very poor view of the Bible if you believe that is what God cares about...mindstorm

Nope. Gays shouldn't have the special right to change the deffinition of a word that was not intended for them to use. Silenthps

Romer V Evans.

That case was about Colorado's Admendment 2, which basically stated it's perfectly fine for homosexuals to be discriminated against without any possibility of a lawsuit, which was struck down by the supreme court. Justice Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion and this was about "Special rights":

To the contrary, the amendment imposes a special disability upon those persons alone. Homosexuals are forbidden the safeguards that others enjoy or may seek without constraint

This case of gay marriage, It still applies. There is no instance of going after "Special rights" to get married, when straight couples can marry without a lot of problems

[QUOTE="mindstorm"]You used the morality of the Bible as an argument against me and then say it's not right? Make up your mind as to whether or not I should follow what it says....You have a very poor view of the Bible if you believe that is what God cares about...deepdreamer256

^^^this

[QUOTE="Litchie"]

Haha, what? Seriously? There are actually people saying "no"?. Holy jebus.. Why in the hell wouldn't you accept gay marriage? Isn't it up to the ones getting married if they want to be married or not? I have no interest, whatsoever, in which sex marries which, and it really saddens me that some people do.

FragStains

...He or she cares because when people do care about who marries who they sound like douchebags.

Marriage was never meant to have anything to do with Government. Marriage is a religous practice.

Why the Government wants to get involved with it is beyond me.

Homosexuality is genetically caused, it's not like they can decide to not be homosexual at their own will.yoshi-lnex

I doubt that to be true... And even if it might be, that doesn't mean you have to follow through with it. Alcoholism runs in my family... that doesn't mean I have to become an alcoholic however.
mindstorm

[QUOTE="mindstorm"] I doubt that to be true... And even if it might be, that doesn't mean you have to follow through with it. Alcoholism runs in my family... that doesn't mean I have to become an alcoholic however.
deepdreamer256

[QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"] I doubt that to be true... And even if it might be, that doesn't mean you have to follow through with it. Alcoholism runs in my family... that doesn't mean I have to become an alcoholic however.
mindstorm

[QUOTE="yoshi-lnex"]Homosexuality is genetically caused, it's not like they can decide to not be homosexual at their own will.mindstorm

Alcoholism on the other hand is not the same thing, if you stop drinking you can end an addiction, you can never stop holding your sexual orientation though.

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]Nope. Gays shouldn't have the special right to change the deffinition of a word that was not intended for them to use. Ring_of_fire

Romer V Evans.

That case was about Colorado's Admendment 2, which basically stated it's perfectly fine for homosexuals to be discriminated against without any possibility of a lawsuit, which was struck down by the supreme court. Justice Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion and this was about "Special rights":

To the contrary, the amendment imposes a special disability upon those persons alone. Homosexuals are forbidden the safeguards that others enjoy or may seek without constraint

This case of gay marriage, It still applies. There is no instance of going after "Special rights" to get married, when straight couples can marry without a lot of problems

This is a very bad analogy but idc. How would you like it if everyone changed the deffinition of chicken, to playstation3. I mean, it's kool if you and your friends wanna call it playstation 3 in your own private time. But when you legalize it and make it the official deffinition for the whole society to live by it, then its a diffrent case. People shouldn't have the right to do that.

NO, i dont like it at all, im not mean to gay people i treat them like any other human being but if they asked me what i thought about gay marriage i would say i dont agree with it.ryangb

Well clearly you don't treat them like every other human being if you don't want them to be able to marry who they want. Why should people like you have the authority to impose your beliefs onto others and restrict their freedoms when it doesn't harm anybody else? Seriously, what's wrong with them getting married if they want? Is it immoral? If so, how? It's a load of homophobic crap if you don't believe they have every right to be equal to everyone else.

[QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"]You used the morality of the Bible as an argument against me and then say it's not right? Make up your mind as to whether or not I should follow what it says....You have a very poor view of the Bible if you believe that is what God cares about...legend26

^^^this

[QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"] I doubt that to be true... And even if it might be, that doesn't mean you have to follow through with it. Alcoholism runs in my family... that doesn't mean I have to become an alcoholic however.
deepdreamer256

[QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"] I doubt that to be true... And even if it might be, that doesn't mean you have to follow through with it. Alcoholism runs in my family... that doesn't mean I have to become an alcoholic however.
mindstorm

Why do straight people have to enter into relationships at all? >_>

[QUOTE="Ring_of_fire"]

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]Nope. Gays shouldn't have the special right to change the deffinition of a word that was not intended for them to use. Silenthps

Romer V Evans.

That case was about Colorado's Admendment 2, which basically stated it's perfectly fine for homosexuals to be discriminated against without any possibility of a lawsuit, which was struck down by the supreme court. Justice Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion and this was about "Special rights":

To the contrary, the amendment imposes a special disability upon those persons alone. Homosexuals are forbidden the safeguards that others enjoy or may seek without constraint

This case of gay marriage, It still applies. There is no instance of going after "Special rights" to get married, when straight couples can marry without a lot of problems

This is a very bad analogy but idc. How would you like it if everyone changed the deffinition of chicken, to playstation3. I mean, it's kool if you and your friends wanna call it playstation 3 in your own private time. But when you legalize it and make it the official deffinition for the whole society to live by it, then its a diffrent case. People shouldn't have the right to do that.

[QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"] I doubt that to be true... And even if it might be, that doesn't mean you have to follow through with it. Alcoholism runs in my family... that doesn't mean I have to become an alcoholic however.
mindstorm

Why do you have to enter into a relationship at all?

Think before you post...

[QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"] I doubt that to be true... And even if it might be, that doesn't mean you have to follow through with it. Alcoholism runs in my family... that doesn't mean I have to become an alcoholic however.
Aquat1cF1sh

Why do straight people have to enter into relationships at all? >_>

No they do not.

[QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"] I doubt that to be true... And even if it might be, that doesn't mean you have to follow through with it. Alcoholism runs in my family... that doesn't mean I have to become an alcoholic however.
BlackAlpha666

Why do you have to enter into a relationship at all?

Think before you post...

[QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"] I doubt that to be true... And even if it might be, that doesn't mean you have to follow through with it. Alcoholism runs in my family... that doesn't mean I have to become an alcoholic however.
mindstorm

[QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"] I doubt that to be true... And even if it might be, that doesn't mean you have to follow through with it. Alcoholism runs in my family... that doesn't mean I have to become an alcoholic however.
mindstorm

[QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"] I doubt that to be true... And even if it might be, that doesn't mean you have to follow through with it. Alcoholism runs in my family... that doesn't mean I have to become an alcoholic however.
mindstorm

Partly for procreation.... which homosexuals cannot do...
mindstorm

No they do not.mindstorm

[QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"] I doubt that to be true... And even if it might be, that doesn't mean you have to follow through with it. Alcoholism runs in my family... that doesn't mean I have to become an alcoholic however.
deepdreamer256

[QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="mindstorm"] I doubt that to be true... And even if it might be, that doesn't mean you have to follow through with it. Alcoholism runs in my family... that doesn't mean I have to become an alcoholic however.
yoshi-lnex

[QUOTE="Ring_of_fire"]

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]Nope. Gays shouldn't have the special right to change the deffinition of a word that was not intended for them to use. Silenthps

Romer V Evans.

That case was about Colorado's Admendment 2, which basically stated it's perfectly fine for homosexuals to be discriminated against without any possibility of a lawsuit, which was struck down by the supreme court. Justice Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion and this was about "Special rights":

To the contrary, the amendment imposes a special disability upon those persons alone. Homosexuals are forbidden the safeguards that others enjoy or may seek without constraint

This case of gay marriage, It still applies. There is no instance of going after "Special rights" to get married, when straight couples can marry without a lot of problems

This is a very bad analogy but idc. How would you like it if everyone changed the deffinition of chicken, to playstation3. I mean, it's kool if you and your friends wanna call it playstation 3 in your own private time. But when you legalize it and make it the official deffinition for the whole society to live by it, then its a diffrent case. People shouldn't have the right to do that.

Gays do have the right to marry in certain states and coutries, but saying gays have the right to marry a member of the opposite sex really isn't any different than saying "If a person of a certain race wants to marry, they can." back before interacial marriage was legal.