This topic is locked from further discussion.
Google Mythbusters Moon Landing. Or watch the episode. Enough said.
Here's the way I look at it:
If we went to the moon: big whoop. What did it achieve? Nothing.
If we didn't go to the moon then what do we have? Nothing.
Same big whoop, same out come. Get over it.
DigitalExile
Modern day and future technology and hopes for space colonization says hi. Get over it.
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09201/985039-51.stm
http://www.pcworld.com/article/173354/it_came_from_outer_space_nasa_innovations_we_use_on_earth.html
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=nasa+technology+in+everyday+life&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&aqi=&oq=nasa+technology+in+everyday+life&fp=b36c7832dbb01be6
they say we went to the moon, so I believe them.. since that's the concept majority of knoweldge is based on..
[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"][QUOTE="Snipes_2"]Well,I'm not sure. No he doesn't. There is an internatioanlly accepted law stating that one, including countries, cannot claim territory on the moon as their own. You cannot own land on the moon no matter what. Ugh,how lame is that.Are you serious :o?
cpo335
[QUOTE="GTA_dude"] As for the stars, you got to remember the picture was took with a 40 year old camera, resolution wasn't that great on those things. Haven't you ever looked at 40 year old pictures? Even on earth they looked horrible. You cant expect them to be in HD quality.... Yoshi25No, no, no. The men on the moon did have HD cameras back then. They just weren't commercially available. Of course they were. Large and Medium Format cameras were the norm until the Nikon F became popular with photojournalists during the Korean War, and were very widely used up until the last couple of years.
[QUOTE="Yoshi25"][QUOTE="GTA_dude"] As for the stars, you got to remember the picture was took with a 40 year old camera, resolution wasn't that great on those things. Haven't you ever looked at 40 year old pictures? Even on earth they looked horrible. You cant expect them to be in HD quality.... Engrish_MajorNo, no, no. The men on the moon did have HD cameras back then. They just weren't commercially available. Of course they were. Large and Medium Format cameras were the norm until the Nikon F became popular with photojournalists during the Korean War, and were very widely used up until the last couple of years. Sorry, I should have been more specific. By commercial I meant every Jack and Jane didn't have one.
Everyone needs to be quiet and go watch myth busters on youtube.
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=mythbusters+moon+landing&search_type=&aq=1s&oq=myth+busters+mo
[QUOTE="J-Man725"]
I believe I heard something about NASA hoping to send another manned mission within the next decade.
hyrueprince11
they also want to send a manned misssion to mars
Really? That'd be quite the achievement.
I imagine that would spark up a lot of renewed interest in the space program.
You smartypants!The flag waved without air because that is what the astronaut did for get a better picture. If you put the flag up it will stay up because there is very little gravity. There were no stars in the picture because it is very bright on the moon. In order to allow us to view everything they needed to turn the aperture, or something, down to allow us to view the landscape.
BumFluff122
Of course the flags moves, if he just plopped it down then with gravity it's going to move... and there's a bar along to top of the flag to hold it up.
I already made a thread back in July proving that the moon landing was fake. What follows is a copy-paste of the original post from it:
There are a lot of things about the moon landing that are contradictory. Let's start with something small:
For the airship to have gotten that far away by the time they landed on the surface, it would have had to have been moving far faster than was portrayed. With all of the attention to realism and small detail that was paid here, it's actually kind of funny that they screwed up something so obvious.
This here is obviously Cold War propaganda to vilify Moonmen, as real Moonmen are physically incapable of mimicking The Bangles' 1986 hit single "Walk Like an Egyptian."
Mere seconds after the umbrella-cam shot of a clearly grumpy moon, we have the following image...
The moon, clearly unhappy with the paparazzi, has decided to turn the other way from the airship-cam. Nothing out of the ordinary about that. The real problem is all of the stars that have materialized out of nowhwere. Also, a space fairy cannot ride on the tail of a shooting star. Only the star itself has a high enough density to support their mass.
The moon landing was clearly fake. Don't believe the propaganda of the lunaral media.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment