Battle of the Titans:Shaun of the Dead VS Zombieland!

So,which one do you prefer.
Having seen both now.
Shaun of the dead about 38 times and Zombieland 7 times(just got the movie).
I still think Shaun wins.Zombieland was a fun movie and Woody was hilarious.(Thank God for Rednecks!)..I still gotta give Shaun of the Dead more credit.

Shaun of the Dead obviously...

Zombieland was just another typical Hollywood movie. It was OK at best. Shaun of the Dead has some of the funniest lines I have ever heard in film.

i guess i liked Zombieland better.

I like Shaun of the Dead, but then again I haven't seen Zombieland so I'm more than a bit biased.

Ima go with Shaun of the Dead as well, but zombieland was still an alright movie.

Shaun of the Dead had a far better plot, it was actually believable. If there was a zombie apocalypse that is probably exactly how i'd react. Get to the pub and wait it out.

Bill Murray = Zombieland: 1, Shaun of the Dead: 0

even though i havn't seen Zombielan i would still vote for SotD

Shaun of the Dead had a far better plot, it was actually believable. If there was a zombie apocalypse that is probably exactly how i'd react. Get to the pub and wait it out.

mattisgod01

[QUOTE="clayron"]Shaun of the Dead WAS. NOT. FUNNY. It sucked. Zombieland was hilarious.akuma_od3

Wow. You just embarassed yourself in front of the entire thread. If you honestly thought Zombieland was "hilarious" and Shaun of the Dead was "not funny", then you clearly have no idea (or are simply American).

[QUOTE="mattisgod01"]

Shaun of the Dead had a far better plot, it was actually believable. If there was a zombie apocalypse that is probably exactly how i'd react. Get to the pub and wait it out.

Serraph105

You should read "The Zombie Survival Guide". Best place to go when the apocolypse happens is in fact....a prison. Think about it. It has guns and it is a fortress.

Worst place to go would be a hospital. Thats where it will all begin...

[QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="mattisgod01"]

Shaun of the Dead had a far better plot, it was actually believable. If there was a zombie apocalypse that is probably exactly how i'd react. Get to the pub and wait it out.

akuma_od3

You should read "The Zombie Survival Guide". Best place to go when the apocolypse happens is in fact....a prison. Think about it. It has guns and it is a fortress.

Worst place to go would be a hospital. Thats where it will all begin...

[QUOTE="akuma_od3"]

[QUOTE="clayron"]Shaun of the Dead WAS. NOT. FUNNY. It sucked. Zombieland was hilarious.clayron

Wow. You just embarassed yourself in front of the entire thread. If you honestly thought Zombieland was "hilarious" and Shaun of the Dead was "not funny", then you clearly have no idea (or are simply American).

You embarrassed yourself because you said "it sucked". Its obvious that the only people who would say it sucked, are people who didnt understand the humour (which was WAY smarter than Zombielame). If you didnt like it, it is simply because you didn't understand it, and thats a crying shame.

I voted shaun of the dead =p

That movie's gold

[QUOTE="clayron"][QUOTE="akuma_od3"]

Wow. You just embarassed yourself in front of the entire thread. If you honestly thought Zombieland was "hilarious" and Shaun of the Dead was "not funny", then you clearly have no idea (or are simply American).

akuma_od3

You embarrassed yourself because you said "it sucked". Its obvious that the only people who would say it sucked, are people who didnt understand the humour (which was WAY smarter than Zombielame). If you didnt like it, it is simply because you didn't understand it, and thats a crying shame.

Zombieland had action over comedy, although it has several humerous moments I only laughed out loud at one moment (when he gets on the bike and falls off :lol: ). Shaun of the Dead put comedy over action.

[QUOTE="MrLions"][QUOTE="Sajedene"]Shaun of the Dead definitely! The only thing I thought was funny with Zombieland was the beginning with the rules.Sajedene

Everything they did in Shawn of the Dead was carefully planned out, the plan may have been flawed but it was still a plan. Also i thought the Bill Murray part was out of place, it felt like they only added him to the movie to get cheap laughs. Like when you see in TV shows or movies a random celebrity playing themselves walks into the scene for a 10 second cameo appearance, they serve no purpose to anything so i always hate when they do it.

[QUOTE="akuma_od3"]

[QUOTE="clayron"] Embarrassed myself? Why? Because I did not like a movie? Are you kidding? Or are you an idiot who believes all people must have similar taste in movies? I did not like Shaun of the Dead, and I did like Zombieland. That is kind of the long and short of it.clayron

You embarrassed yourself because you said "it sucked". Its obvious that the only people who would say it sucked, are people who didnt understand the humour (which was WAY smarter than Zombielame). If you didnt like it, it is simply because you didn't understand it, and thats a crying shame.

Nah. You didn't get it. I guess you have to have lived in London or the UK at least to get most of it. Its not your fault, but you didnt get it.

I know he isn't. I'm talking about the lead guy (Columbus) - he was playing Michael Cera. Woody was playing himself. And Bill Murray played the bumbling washed up fool. Don't cry. Its just my opinion.Sajedene

[QUOTE="clayron"][QUOTE="akuma_od3"]

You embarrassed yourself because you said "it sucked". Its obvious that the only people who would say it sucked, are people who didnt understand the humour (which was WAY smarter than Zombielame). If you didnt like it, it is simply because you didn't understand it, and thats a crying shame.

akuma_od3

Nah. You didn't get it. I guess you have to have lived in London or the UK at least to get most of it. Its not your fault, but you didnt get it.

[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="MrLions"] WHAT!?!?! You're crazy! That Bill Muary scene was funny :cry:mattisgod01

Everything they did in Shawn of the Dead was carefully planned out, the plan may have been flawed but it was still a plan. Also i thought the Bill Murray part was out of place, it felt like they only added him to the movie to get cheap laughs. Like when you see in TV shows or movies a random celebrity playing themselves walks into the scene for a 10 second cameo appearance, they serve no purpose to anything so i always hate when they do it.

[QUOTE="akuma_od3"]

[QUOTE="clayron"] Please explain to me how any of that is obvious. I got the humor, there were parts I chuckled, but I really did not enjoy. How about you get off that pedestal bud.clayron

Nah. You didn't get it. I guess you have to have lived in London or the UK at least to get most of it. Its not your fault, but you didnt get it.

Sure. You're the one who thought Shaun of the Dead "sucked". Go back to watching Gladiators or whatever it is you Americans find entertaining.

[QUOTE="akuma_od3"]Nah. You didn't get it. I guess you have to have lived in London or the UK at least to get most of it. Its not your fault, but you didnt get it.clayron

I bet he's just livid that we have a BBC America channel.

[QUOTE="Sajedene"]I know he isn't. I'm talking about the lead guy (Columbus) - he was playing Michael Cera. Woody was playing himself. And Bill Murray played the bumbling washed up fool. Don't cry. Its just my opinion.DigitalExile

[QUOTE="clayron"][QUOTE="akuma_od3"]

Nah. You didn't get it. I guess you have to have lived in London or the UK at least to get most of it. Its not your fault, but you didnt get it.

akuma_od3

Sure. You're the one who thought Shaun of the Dead "sucked". Go back to watching Gladiators or whatever it is you Americans find entertaining.

[QUOTE="akuma_od3"]

Nah. You didn't get it. I guess you have to have lived in London or the UK at least to get most of it. Its not your fault, but you didnt get it.

clayron

I'm with clayron on this. While I thought Shaun of the Dead was way funnier, akuma, your argument is just ridiculous. clayron didn't like it, that doesn't mean he didn't "get" it. He just didn't like it. Personal opinion > your argument, not that your argument is strong anyway.

[QUOTE="clayron"][QUOTE="akuma_od3"]

Nah. You didn't get it. I guess you have to have lived in London or the UK at least to get most of it. Its not your fault, but you didnt get it.

akuma_od3

Sure. You're the one who thought Shaun of the Dead "sucked". Go back to watching Gladiators or whatever it is you Americans find entertaining.

[QUOTE="clayron"][QUOTE="akuma_od3"]

Nah. You didn't get it. I guess you have to have lived in London or the UK at least to get most of it. Its not your fault, but you didnt get it.

akuma_od3

Sure. You're the one who thought Shaun of the Dead "sucked". Go back to watching Gladiators or whatever it is you Americans find entertaining.

ahhhh i cant choose i loved both of them

but ill go with Shaun of the Dead

I enjoyed both immensely, but Shaun of the Dead is the clear victor.

I enjoyed both immensely, but Shaun of the Dead is the clear victor.

Jackboot343

Shaun of the dead by far. Zombieland is fun and Woody Harrelson is great in it, but the film was very dull and bland for the most part. Zombie movies have been done to death by now and Zombieland didnt have much that made it stand out other than Harrelson. Shaun of the dead however was much better in every way. It was much better written and was much funnier than zombieland too. I got all of the little British cultural references, and that humor just appeals to me much more. It is just a better film to me. Some may not like how it turned serious later on, but I think that the transition was done very well.

Zombieland was good, but Shaun of the Dead seems pretty much insurmountable in the zombie comedy department.

Titan? Zombieland? Hardly.