@thatforumuser: "U think this is fair to leak prosecution tape with Donald J Trump hand tied behind the back?"
Donald Trump isn't prohibited from seeing the classified documents, but there are restrictions to how, and it has to be in the presence of his legal council, given their sensitivity, doubly appropriate in the greater context of the crimes he's accused of. He cannot retain these documents or copies of them for his personal records. And even though you're oh-so super-duper very wrong about Trump having access to discovery, it'd be amusing to act like it's exculpatory evidence, it's the exact opposite, it's the smoking gun, and yeah, he has access to it, or else it couldn't be used in trial by prosecution, it's just controlled access.
The judge will likely set additional constraints during the evidentiary hearing. Both sides will tell the judge what evidence and witnesses they plan to use, in prosecution/defense and how they plan to structure their prosecution/defense, both sides can make submission and suppression requests and a judge will rule on those before the trial begins. The prosecution and defense will know what they can and can't talk about.
Mostly likely the judge will not grant evidence of irrelevant facts to the trial. Any of the normal right wing spin like arguing the the tape vindicated him because the issue was he's being prosecuted for policy and a contingency plan constitutes hypocrisy by Milley ergo Trump is innocent, the judge would slap the fuuuck out of any attorney that brings that bullshit before their court, even a MAGA nutter recruited from the Federalist Society. Nor would a competent judge allow the defense to argue something along lines that this is a President Records Act issue and the law doesn't say what he did isn't a crime, again, because the judge knows he's being prosecuted under criminal statutes laid out under the Espionage Act. None of that right wing spin BS you all love because even though you can't wrap your heads around it you think the person who thought it up must be a genius. I think it'll be a jump-ball whether she'll even let him argue his claim he declassified them, because the judge will know this isn't the case. But even if she granted that, the prosecution will tear that defense to shreds.
And who leaked this tape? Could have been Trump, there'd be no restriction from him having access to other evidence that doesn't require such protections, and leaked it thinking it would vindicate him. That's the spin you guys slurped up with no resistance to its absurdity. Worse is despite this tape he has countless times admitted to having these classified documents, just he claims he has a right to them, also something a judge might prohibit claiming in court. No lawyer either will argue that for him, and I am sure any competent lawyer won't let Trump take the stand to argue that himself as a cross examination from the prosecutors will seal the deal.
And I really don't see this tape as enlightening in the least since we knew of this event during his indictment, we just hear it outright and not just read a transcription. The groundbreaking news of late IMO is how he's likely going to indicted again in the fake electors plot, that all requests to testify to the grand jury about it have until end of month to do so. Sounds like he'll be indicating Trump AGAIN in coming weeks.
Also, the world isn't trying Trump's arms behind his back, he's doing it himself. Any defense Trump could have tried, like feigning ignorance he had them, gone the moment he admits to taking them. He even could have avoided a lot of his troubles if he listened to his lawyers. Again, his fault. Some point this guy needs to learn a lesson, not feed his sense of entitlement never to be held accountable.
Log in to comment