If I may offer my own thoughts on this - I think a part of it is two-fold. On one side, I think it's true about the "online interaction" scene - so many sites (Gamespot included!) now just have a "sign up and post" format that anyone could claim to be a "journalist" and write reviews. Heck, technically I don't have a piece of paper saying I am one, just a certificate saying I'm an above-average English major, and an online certificate says I passed a basic free online journalism course. So I have the education, but not the experience to prove it yet.
However, the other side of the coin is this - especially with gaming or any entertainment write-up: You are going to get 10 times more opinion based articles than any other media. If for instance, I write about my other passion, food. I could say, "This is a good recipe, it may just need some more veggies" or something. The harshest reaction I might get is, "I don't agree, this amount works perfectly!" Now if I wrote a review of say, The Division. If I make the tiniest opinion, such as "I think it'd be cool to see a first-person option." - the next day, there would be so many angry opinions stating that's a TERRIBLE idea, or they can't believe I'd ever want to even mess with The Division, or something similar.
I do feel it's the social media aspect of the Internet and blogging tools that has made game journalism a tough ride. The sweet spot seemed to be when every game console and PC had a magazine, the gamers had a magazine, and even the TV channel G4 had good news shows like X-Play and Attack of the Show. But as soon as blogging and multiple sites came out - at least 5 magazines disappeared, and now G4 is just random geeky reruns.
Log in to comment