@huerito323 said:
@Metamania said:
@huerito323 said:
Agreeing with a review on a game you haven't even played is idiotic. If the time limit bothers you, then the game is not meant for you. It doesn't make it a bad game because you can't deal with that. If I don't like violent games, I'm not going to shit all over GTA and call it a bad game. Many people that have already finished the game have had no problem with the time limit, and you can increase it by doing quests. The time limit is part of the game design, and you don't have to do every side quest on your first playthrough. There's new game+.
It's ridiculous how much hate this series is getting, all for changing things up and actually doing something different. Yet people complain when games stay the same. I feel bad for developers.
I'm not going to listen to this crap and your theory about violent games and GTA has no purpose being here. If you enjoy the game, that's fine, but if not, that's fine too. I've only played the demo from start to finish and can pretty much imagine what the rest of the game will be like for me. But to tell me that I agree with a review of a game that I haven't played is idiotic is a waste of time. I do what I want, when I please.
I played enough Final Fantasy XIII to know that it's one of the worst trilogies I've seen and even if Final Fantasy XIII-2 made some improvements, that doesn't mean it's a great series. Basically, what I'm telling you is that Square Enix screwed the pooch on FFXIII and in order to justify its existence, they had to shove it down our throats to make money when it's not even that good to BEGIN WITH. Why aren't people realizing that?
You sure do, and I'm not going to do anything about it except be the guy that tells you it's idiotic. If someone asks for an opinion on a video game they're thinking about getting, are they going to listen to the guy who just played the demo, or the guy who played the full game? The answer is simple and I don't even need to explain it.
They didn't shove anything down your throat, nor did they take your money. You've only played the demo remember? The people who buy it are the people that are fans of the XIII series. Move on already and stop being such a baby for no reason.
You don't need to ask me a stupid question like that and all you've been doing is wasting valuable time with. Quite frankly, you're wasting your time being here if you're attempting to convince of anything, because you haven't done an excellent job n it. You had your chance earlier on, but you blew it. So that's on you.
Also, let me remind you something; a demo is just a taste of things to come. Certainly, some, if not, a lot of things will be different. But this demo that I played is pretty much what I'll be expecting when I play the full version at some point in the future and I know, for a FACT, that the only thing that would get me to play the game would be for the battle system. That's it. The characters, story, atmosphere, everything around that, I would not be pleased with because SE killed any potential it had with the first game. So no, I don't need to play the full game if the demo holds up well enough to give me a good idea of the full game. If you're going to tell me that the demo is COMPLETELY different from the full game, then you got problems. But it SEEMS like you're intelligent enough to know the difference between the two, so that's all I have to say about that.
I'm done explaining myself here. That's it. All I asked from people was a question and you failed to do that. So again, pal, that's on you.
Log in to comment