Qualifying still important in 2012 season

Avatar image for Redders1989
Redders1989

13410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 Redders1989
Member since 2006 • 13410 Posts
Qualifying is no less important a determining factor in who wins races in Formula 1 in 2012 than it has been in previous seasons.

There have been suggestions that the combination of high-degradation Pirelli rubber and the relative ease of overtaking have reduced the impact of Saturday afternoons, but the statistics suggest this not to be the case.

An analysis of the past 10 years of Formula 1, a total of 172 grands prix from the start of the 2003 season to the Hungarian Grand Prix earlier this month, reveals that this year, 55 per cent of races have been won from pole.

By comparison, the mean for the past decade for wins from pole stands at 52 per cent, three per cent lower than this season.

In 2012, 82 per cent of races have been won from the front row, which is seven per cent higher than the average.

The mean average qualifying position for race winners is 2.7, relatively high compared to the previous 10 years, but this is distorted by Fernando Alonso's exceptional wins from 11th at Valencia and eight at Sepang.

Despite the belief that qualifying is not as important as it was in the pre-DRS, Bridgestone era, the 2010 season produced the lowest percentage of race winners from pole position.

While it is clearly easier to pass this year than it was before the introduction of the DRS and Pirelli rubber, the need to manage tyres makes it difficult to charge in races.

Also, time lost by a quick car in traffic in the first stint of the race is difficult to make up given how tight the competitive spread between the top nine teams is.

During this period there have been a number of changes to the regs that have effected the way cars qualify. Most significant is the ban on refueling ahead of the 2010 season.

Percentage wins from pole by season (*)
1. 2007: 65%
2. 2004: 61%
3. 2003: 56%
4. 2006: 56%
5. 2012: 55%
6. 2009: 53%
7. 2011: 47%
8. 2005: 47%
9. 2008: 44%
10. 2010: 42%

Percentage of races won from the front row by season (*)
2007: 88%
2011: 84%
2004: 84%
2012: 82%
2008: 78%
2010: 74%
2006: 72%
2009: 71%
2005: 63%
2003: 56%

Average starting position of race winners by season (*)
1. 2003: 3.2
2. 2005: 3.2
3. 2012: 2.8
4. 2006: 2.7
5. 2008: 2.6
6. 2009: 2.2
7. 2004: 2.2
8. 2010: 2.0
9. 2011: 1.9
10. 2007: 1.5

* Figures rounded up to nearest whole number. In the case of a tie, the figures are ordered by reference to unrounded number.

SOURCE: Autosport

Avatar image for SadPSPAddict
SadPSPAddict

5462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

#2 SadPSPAddict
Member since 2006 • 5462 Posts

Interesting - as stats always are. But I believe that there is a big influencing factor that wasn't mentioned in the article at all - reliability. How often did we hold our breath over the last few laps of a race praying that an engine would/wouldn't blow up or some similar mechanical failure occur. For all or all bar one cars to finish a race was unheard of until the last couple of years where it has become common place.

At least that's my perception - I dare say someone will crunch the numbers and prove me right or wrong :P

Avatar image for Rayrota
Rayrota

1456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 Rayrota
Member since 2005 • 1456 Posts
Well there were only 7 engine related retirements last year, zero for Mercedes engines.
Avatar image for SadPSPAddict
SadPSPAddict

5462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

#6 SadPSPAddict
Member since 2006 • 5462 Posts

Well there were only 7 engine related retirements last year, zero for Mercedes engines.Rayrota

Yes exactly thus making it more likely that the "fast" cars get on the front row of the grid and go on to win