Character Battle III: Winner: Kirby + Nominations

No I was saying Michael should have nominated Android 18 instead of 16. :PMr_Jenkins

Why? Android 16 was way cooler.

What the hell? Both of these are sucky.

Not voting :cool:

What the hell? Both of these are sucky.

Not voting :cool:

Aidan129

No, you're sucky. :x

What is wrong with Baby Bowser?Courtney817

There's nothing particularly good about him. 

Both are lame. Not voting.DrAwesomeMD

Eeyup. 

[QUOTE="DrAwesomeMD"]Both are lame. Not voting.DrAwesomeMD

Eeyup. 

STFU You can't judge something you never experimented. 

[QUOTE="DrAwesomeMD"]

[QUOTE="DrAwesomeMD"]Both are lame. Not voting.Wetty01

Eeyup. 

STFU You can't judge something you never experimented. 

U mad bro?

I voted for Oak, too. However, if I ever need to go to the hospital, I want this Dr. Stiles to be my doctor. :oops: 

I abstain from voting.DrAwesomeMD

I know. The choices this time around are unusually crappy.

[QUOTE="DrAwesomeMD"]I abstain from voting.Aidan129

I know. The choices this time around are unusually crappy.

Aidan, how can you not like meat? :P

Anyways, Meat Boy, evem though it was hard to chose. :P 

Tiebreaker today between Henry Touchdown and Meat Boy. First to 3 votes wins. I choose Meat Boy.

And I voted for Layton.

I don't think that Michael should be able to vote in any tiebreaker! At least not right away. The winner is declared when one of the deadlocked opponents reaches three votes, but since Michael votes in the exact same post that the deadlock is declared, it automatically gives the advantage to the character he voted for! As in, the tiebreaker automatically starts off at 1-0 in favor of Michael's choice. He should have to wait until somebody else votes, that way the entire processes is a fair one!

I should note that this has nothing to do with the results of yesterday's tiebreaker. I did not care for either character, did not care which one prevailed, and subsequently did not vote. But for the sake of fairness, I thought I should broach the subject. 

I don't think that Michael should be able to vote in any tiebreaker! At least not right away. The winner is declared when one of the deadlocked opponents reaches three votes, but since Michael votes in the exact same post that the deadlock is declared, it automatically gives the advantage to the character he voted for! As in, the tiebreaker automatically starts off at 1-0 in favor of Michael's choice. He should have to wait until somebody else votes, that way the entire processes is a fair one!

I should note that this has nothing to do with the results of yesterday's tiebreaker. I did not care for either character, did not care which one prevailed, and subsequently did not vote. But for the sake of fairness, I thought I should broach the subject. 

Courtney817

Yeah I thought about this too. 

I don't think that Michael should be able to vote in any tiebreaker! At least not right away. The winner is declared when one of the deadlocked opponents reaches three votes, but since Michael votes in the exact same post that the deadlock is declared, it automatically gives the advantage to the character he voted for! As in, the tiebreaker automatically starts off at 1-0 in favor of Michael's choice. He should have to wait until somebody else votes, that way the entire processes is a fair one!

I should note that this has nothing to do with the results of yesterday's tiebreaker. I did not care for either character, did not care which one prevailed, and subsequently did not vote. But for the sake of fairness, I thought I should broach the subject.

Courtney817

He's still going to vote either way, so I don't see the big deal.

I don't see why it matters. It's essentially the same thing as voting in the poll. I'm always the first person to vote in the poll so what's the difference? It's not like I'm rigging it in any way, shape, or form. And besides, it gets the tiebreaker over with faster with one vote already cast.

Voted for Sgt. Byrd too.

I don't see why it matters. It's essentially the same thing as voting in the poll. I'm always the first person to vote in the poll so what's the difference? It's not like I'm rigging it in any way, shape, or form. And besides, it gets the tiebreaker over with faster with one vote already cast.

Voted for Sgt. Byrd too.

Dragon66116

Well for tie-breakers it does matter since it's the three to vote first.  In the regular poll you can connect once a day without worrying about time and the result won't change. 

[QUOTE="Dragon66116"]

I don't see why it matters. It's essentially the same thing as voting in the poll. I'm always the first person to vote in the poll so what's the difference? It's not like I'm rigging it in any way, shape, or form. And besides, it gets the tiebreaker over with faster with one vote already cast.

Voted for Sgt. Byrd too.

Wetty01

Well for tie-breakers it does matter since it's the three to vote first.  In the regular poll you can connect once a day without worrying about time and the result won't change. 

Okay, but how is me not voting first going to change anything? I'm still going to vote so it doesn't really matter.

Well, if other people manage to see the post before you vote, it may give the other a better chance of winning.  So I suggest you should wait something like 30 minutes before inputting your vote on tie-breakers.

Yeah, I never thought of that before! :x This contest thing really is a sham.

Okay, but how is me not voting first going to change anything? I'm still going to vote so it doesn't really matter. Dragon66116

Uh, if you're not allowed to vote until someone else does, then there's a chance that 3 other people could sneak in before you can come back and declare a winner, without you voting at all. Nobody else is guranteed a vote. Why should you be?

Well, in that case, I demand that I am *ALSO* guaranteed a vote in every tiebreaker.

Either way, someone is going to get a 1-0 head start, so I don't see the big deal with Mike kicking it off.DrAwesomeMD

This, exactly.

Also, if you aren't on early enough to get in a vote for the tiebreaker, it's not my fault.