Worms Forts: Under Siege

Classic or Pathetic?

User Rating: 6.8 | Worms Forts: Under Siege PS2

By gamepopper | Review Date: March 25, 2006

Classic: Featuring classic voiceover and weapons, which does make the game good. It also features funny storyboards, missions, voiceovers and weapons, good scenarios and it has good graphics when playing movies.

Pathetic: Worms Forts Under Siege has the same graphics as Worms 3-D and doesn't feature the never play the same scenarios twice feature, which makes the game a bit boring. And finally, the game has pathetic, really bad voice over timing.

Classic? Can make people remember the first worms game.
Pathetic? Team 17 should have made Worms Forts: Under Siege better.

This means Worms Forts: Under Siege is a classic (but not a good classic) game.

Other Helpful Reviews for Worms Forts: Under Siege

• Rating:2.5

  The original formula has been killed off and replaced with crappy nonsense!!! :(

  By Gardevoir_1993 | Review Date: Aug 31, 2007 | PS2

  The Good: Mass Destruction, Customisation of Worms The Bad: Customisation severely limited, boring, over-reliance on buildings, limited sudden death options, links on buildings, Worms barely do anything by themselves.... Read Full Review

  1 of 1 users found the following review helpful
• Rating:6.1

  The Worms Series is really starting to show its age.

  By CoolZaim | Review Date: Jun 13, 2006 | PS2

  Worms Forts: Under Siege! is actually a huge, huge, huge dissapointment. It isn't horrible, but tts very slow paced and no destructable enviroments really do spil the game. The game usually just isn't fun. The variet... Read Full Review

  1 of 1 users found the following review helpful