DazKurupt wrote: "ps3 is lined up to own the gaming market for 10 years ! So you gota be patient , in the end ps3 will be still alive and kicking when ms and nintendo are introducing some new consoles 4 years from now. At that point ps3 will be attractively priced at 149.00 or 199.00." Okay, you know what the problem with that (unlikely) strategy is? 10 years is just way too long of a period to go through without revisions. I'd give it five or six years as usual. Oh, btw, it'll never drop to $250. Hell, I'd buy it if it had a sub-$300 price tag, but it'll never happen. I'm betting it'll cost $400 four years from now. Now if I could just find a Wii...(-_-')
KorJax wrote: "These high end cards are not really for gamers, considering most human eyes dont notice differences in perforamacne above 30 FPS as long as it doesnt fluxuate, and more "sensitive" eyes will see 60FPS (with no fluxuations) as even more perfectly smooth. Remeber, movies that do not use motion blur run at about 24 FPS, and it looks completely smooth. The people who desire 60+FPS are really idiots who like to show off alot. AA in many people's opionion do not make much difference in quality AT ALL if your runnign the game in a high resolution at 1600x1200. 2x-4x is enough to run any game at a standard resolution and see amazing picture quality. Honestly, look at that 3D Mark picture on the last page. Do you notice any real difference in the larger screenshot? No? Thats because AA doesnt do much at a high resolution, only if you run at lower ones or "zoom in" like in the screenshot. Especially if your in motion" Honestly, I see a huge difference when I play games running at 30fps to those running at 60-75+. U guess thats just me...
Lets see...Devil May Cry FOUR, Final Fantasy THIRTEEN, Metal Gear Solid FOUR, Ridge Racer SEVEN, Tekken SIX, and Virtua Fighter FIVE. Well...I see that they like to keep things original. Taking chances just seems like something they'd like to do [/endsarcasm] Seriously, I'm only looking forward to MGS4 and Too Human. The rest of those titles for either the PS3 or 360 have way too many numbers in 'em or just look plain boring.
Umm...this whole "E3 was the meaning of my life" thing that a bunch of you guys are saying is kind of...disturbing...to say it in one way. I'm betting that the vg industry will realize that a big once-a-year event is going to be a requirement in order to gain big media attention. I'm thinking of this as a "cleansing" moment for E3. It was getting too out of hand. It'll probably come back, only next time it'll be a little more refined and controlled. Seriously though, this choice of action ESA decided to make is a really big positive for people like you and me. More coverage, less nonsense. Only people missing out are those that just turned 18...
Hmm...whatever. Never really was a chance of me gettin' in an E3 anyways. I won't be affected. Game coverage will stay the same. Woop-dee-doo. Who knows, instead of sloppy E3 trailers where a guy is trying to hold a camera steady to a screen with the crowd going crazy, music blaring and lights flashing, we may get better quality coverage.
x505's comments