tatsujb's forum posts

Avatar image for tatsujb
tatsujb

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 tatsujb
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
I totally agree with you, TA4Life. I couldn't agree more on what I believe Supcom FA, GPG, FAF, Supreme commander 2 and planetary annihilation to be. I don't think PA will be any big revolution but It'll please us (who've been on a diet as to what we prey on) for awhile... and then we'll be back on FA. I personally hope to one day see someone buy up the supcom rights and make a third installment or should we say the REAL second installment (because I was more than just disappointed with SupCom2). I Imagine a sup com with bigger (yes this will require even more proportional contrast) more detailed units with bigger maps. I'll stop you right there where you're thinking "but big maps take forever to get across and kill the com" the coms could be the same distance apart and there could be faster units. What I also want is more factions more unit variety and especially moving sea ....Like the raging "you've angered the gods" type were naval units would be swung so crazily up and down they'd have to do more vertical aim correction than horizontal and no naval unit's length would be even half the size of the biggest waves. most of the shells would have to be shot through he waves because after passing the top of the wave the target would be behind it, the unit gestimating where the enemy might actually be. Experimental wars, or star wars type air frigates and carriers strategic zoom all the way out into space , fights in space and on moons. THAT type of FA. and if my idea was a cake then PA is a bite of that cake so I'll take it. I just hope it's not a lick of the frosting, that would be too little.
Avatar image for tatsujb
tatsujb

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 tatsujb
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
Fixed laggyness my registry wasn't up to date since the upgrade from windows 7 to windows 8 so the correct target is: Homeword.exe -w 1920 -h 1080 now trying out halo mod
Avatar image for tatsujb
tatsujb

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 tatsujb
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
Found the fix here: http://blog.coultard.com/2011/12/windows-shortcut-name-specified-not.html apparently you must remove the quotation marks and the path leaving only the exe and the appendments, however this line did not work for me, it launches homeworld on a small portion of the sreen -w 1920 -h 1080 worked however but was incredibly laggy
Avatar image for tatsujb
tatsujb

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 tatsujb
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
oh and outside/ inside quotation marks, OF COURSE I've tried that I've tried a bigilion things ranging from creating shortcuts in different places, diffents ways, placing them in different folders, trying out the exe's properties
Avatar image for tatsujb
tatsujb

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 tatsujb
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
I donot get why I am the only one with this problem: Runing windows 7 (more precicely 8 build 8250, it's not the problem, I have same problem on another comp with xp, and another with windows) I open a freshly made shorcut's properties the target is in between "quotation marks" and the advanced button has everything greyed out and I cannot append ANYTHING not EVER to the target or any other thing. I get this error message: "Problem with Shortcut" "The name 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Homeworld2\Bin\Release\Homeworld2.exe-h 1080 -v 1920' specified in the Target Box is not valid. MAke sure the path and file name are correct. " for Christ sake I install my programs with terminal when I'm on Ubuntu, I can handle wine, just WHAT am I missing here, how do you get windows to allow you to edit target in shortcuts? I get the impression from reading all these forums that no one has ever seen such an error message. HELP