That's actually a pretty damn good idea. I mean most settings offer the same sort of "advantages", there's a river or something, some businesses/industrial, but to have it at a place that could be set as the "prime" location for an army creation that has lots of industrial infrastructure would be best for one of the upcoming games.
Not if they wind up using redudant textures/settings, mass-produced townsfolk that repeat the same 4 lines across the entire game and have mostly repetitive fetch quests. I of course would love to have a longer Fallout game, but at the same time I'd rather they kept changing up the locaitons and kept the script/game solid if they could just produce them a little faster (minimum should be 50 hours for any game though, preferrably close to 100 prior to expansions).
People will always have different opinions, and Fallout isn't exactly an "unpopular" franchise. I loved V.A.T.S., I'd shoot them near death then VATS for the killshot to the head, seriously I thought it would get old but here I am years later still doing the same damn thing. I play the RPGs mostly for the storyline, and Skyrim was certainly awesome but after going back and replaying it, I couldn't believe how boring the characters and quests were, they felt far more "fetch"-ish then Fallout.
I just wish they focused primarily on Elder Scrolls and Fallout, the other titles (which yes may be different studios or whatever, blah blah blah) were just nowhere near as fun.
somesome11's comments