I know what everyone means, but no ones really answer my question. I know the combat system is much more improves, many perks about stats/weapon assigning make it easier. But, my question is the comparison of ME1-ME2. ME2 is better then ME1 alot, but what if we removed that 5 year difference?
Removing controversial topics like the inventory. The combat system is better, graphics are better, but what if ME1 had the advantages that new technology gives bioware in 2010? Would it be better or for worse.
Never heard anyone argue about them removing some of the RPG'ness about it. RPG itself is free roaming customization. I miss the fact that theres only really 2 sets of armor in the entire game. and only like 2-4 different weapons for each weapon type.
So im asking, everyone think really hard about it, is ME2 really better, or is it just the graphics and the extra little perks? I preffer ME2 alot more, but if you made both games in the same year id go with ME1
Log in to comment