ruffryd172's comments

Avatar image for ruffryd172
ruffryd172

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By ruffryd172

Hmm? I never knew that they used HDMI for 360 and component for PS3.... I see why images always seemed washed out for PS3 on this site. Shoot, 360 graphics Look podunk with component cables compared to 360 with HDMI. Even the playing field gamespot you can't compare pc with consoles, and you can't compare component cables with HDMI, especially when trying to fuel a ps3 vs 360 flame fest. Take your images off the 360 with component cables and then try to find a huge difference. When it comes down to it, gamers play. If your friends have ps3 you have ps3. If your friends have 360, you have 360, and when you have both and play the same games same cable hookups, with both systems the only difference in a game, is the controller and who your enjoying the game with. I could argue until my face turns red about what each system has or doesn't, I got em both, and until there's only one console I will own every one. I'm a gamer, that's what I do, thats what fanboys should do, play your crap and don't force what you think is great on others, it's an argument you can't win, so while your all whining about what is better for the rest of the night I'm gonna text my friends and play a game, on either system, thats what gamers should do not itch and moan in a forum all night.

Avatar image for ruffryd172
ruffryd172

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By ruffryd172

games for windows = microsoft, microsoft = xbox360. Of course these games look better on a microsoft platform, that is how they're made. Remember how ps2 held back the first xbox? Its because everyone MADE games for ps2 and then ported it to xbox with a graphical touch. But when exclusives came out for xbox they were 100% better looking. Thats whats going on here 360 had a user base first, so devs. make multiplatform games for the 360 then port it on over to the ps3. Ps3 exclusives with the exception of UBIsofts haze, have looked increadible, none of the same issues seen above. Killzone 2 in its pre-demo form, months ago, was already called (by gamespot) the best looking console game to date, graphically. So its not a hardware issue, it is, and always will be, the devs. saving a but load of money by porting an x86 architecture game to just work on a PPC machine. So I guess sony made a mistake by putting, at the time, the worlds 29th most advanced processor in a gaming machine.

Avatar image for ruffryd172
ruffryd172

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By ruffryd172

I bought gta4 for my ps3 and gameflyd it for 360, I got 2 of the same model tvs in to seperate rooms so i decided to do this for myself. I got both tvs together and i had to force my ps3 to 1080p which sucks, but i set both tvs to dynamic (fixed) which means you cant change any of the property levels, for picture and sound, went into my safehouse on the game and Let me tell you that these gamespot images are shotty, the only diff. btwn. the two is that ps3 had a tiny bit more jagged edge goin on, an the 360 looked a bit better on closer things and the ps3 looked a bit better further away. by a bit better i mean i had to really concentrate for a long time, As for the ubisoft games, they all look better on 360 ubisoft is crud on ps3, thats all that needs to change in my mind.