retrofraction12's comments

  • 12 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for retrofraction12
retrofraction12

437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By retrofraction12

I am not impressed, most of those new features could easily be updates for vist and not a new operating system. shame on microsoft for being so lazy. i have no clue what gamespot was talking about "shoddy driver support" i have never had driver errors. Vista only runs slow if you don't have a core duo and 3-4gb of ram, but that is not new; windows 98 ran slower than 95 on the pentium 1.

Avatar image for retrofraction12
retrofraction12

437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By retrofraction12

I would recomend that you get ccleaner if you have used your computer over a year and want it to work like it did when you first installed windows on it. ( also it fixes all your Registry issues from previously installed programs )

Avatar image for retrofraction12
retrofraction12

437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By retrofraction12

this is anoying why is the 360 cheeper everywhere but the untited states? I would literaly go buy one now if they actually cost that much.

Avatar image for retrofraction12
retrofraction12

437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By retrofraction12

why japan only? if the 360 was this cheep new I would get one. of coarce its because they are trying to out do ps3 in japan which we all know is impossible because Blue-ray is going to be the next dvd

Avatar image for retrofraction12
retrofraction12

437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By retrofraction12

cause ps3 owners defenatly have 400$ more to spend on just a ps3, right now this hardware is too exspencive for how well it performs.

Avatar image for retrofraction12
retrofraction12

437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By retrofraction12

well it is still too early to be worring about this, most developers make thier games for the 360 first and then port it to the ps3 so the ps3 version won't look as good because the engeine is not realy bilt around the platform. But on the contrary metal gear solid 4 is going to look pretty good just because it is only for ps3, not to mention that the have 7.1 uncompressed sound in that game wich the 360 just can't do because of the lack of dvd spave. Edventually if sony pushes poeple to use the full rang of blue ray the 360 will fall behind, but thats if microsoft does not pull a blue ray drive out of no where. on graphics the ps3 has a darker shade of black unforchantlly it looks like on most of the ps3 screans no one has adjust the brightness.

Avatar image for retrofraction12
retrofraction12

437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By retrofraction12

actually if you wach the *** show you would know unlike harry poter does lose once

Avatar image for retrofraction12
retrofraction12

437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By retrofraction12

yeah I finnaly played theis game at a lan of 14 players, and I liked it but there are not enough maps. And some of the game modes are pointless.

Avatar image for retrofraction12
retrofraction12

437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By retrofraction12

you stupid retard the reson why ffWIII had the grapics is because all your attacks and most of you do is a pre made movie they don't have to program all thoughs random movements on halo. stupid, you really can't compare these games grapically

Avatar image for retrofraction12
retrofraction12

437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By retrofraction12

cool, but it must have been had to find areas that look some what the same

  • 12 results
  • 1
  • 2