[QUOTE="rastotm"]It is still a 20% difference between now and when The Netherlands had compulsory voting. I know, arguing along those lines is your best bet. You should try to keep it basic though. 20% including blank votes and in a multi-party system is not that much. As I mentioned try to highlight the formation issues. You can further strengthen your point by explaining the stability issues in the recent years. I have to guess but I think that only one government made it the full 4 years in the last 20 years.Btw the Netherlands tend to have troubles during the formation. Portraying the non-voters as important because even that small group could have a dramatic impact on the formation process is your best bet. It remains a horrible subject to discuss about though.
Â
deeliman
To clarify, I said it is a horrible subject to discuss because it is practically impossible to asses the value of voters. Democracy assumes informed citizens, which is very often not the case. In many ways, a non-voter is better than a uninformed voter.
Log in to comment