High Gun Ownership Makes Countries Less Safe, AJM Finds

  • 157 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for thebest31406
thebest31406

3775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 thebest31406
Member since 2004 • 3775 Posts

The American Journal of Medicine published a study concering gun ownership and public safety and it looks as if it debunks many of the propagandistic misnomers we've receive from pro-gun advocates within the US.  

Generally speaking, developed countries with the most gun ownership are far less safer than those with the least amount of ownership within the developed countries -- South Africa being the exception.  Regarding gun ownership and crime, they found that there was no significant correlation between guns per capita per country and the decreased crime rate, invalidating the claim that more guns translates into less crime. Conversely, the authors also stated that "high crime rates may instigate widespread anxiety and fear, thereby motivating people to arm themselves and give rise to increased gun ownership, which, in turn, increases availability. The resulting vicious cycle could, bit-by-bit, lead to the polarized status that is now the case with the US. Regardless of exact cause and effect, however, the current study debunks the widely quoted hypothesis purporting to show that countries with the higher gun ownership are safer than those with low gun ownership"  

On the issue of mental illness and gun related deaths, they've determined that there does exist a correlation between the two but it was of borderline significance.

 

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/18/gun-ownership-gun-deaths-study

Study: http://www.amjmed.com/webfiles/images/journals/ajm/AJM12080.pdf

Avatar image for Makhaidos
Makhaidos

2162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Makhaidos
Member since 2013 • 2162 Posts
 .
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178878 Posts
Switzerland says otherwise....
Avatar image for Makhaidos
Makhaidos

2162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Makhaidos
Member since 2013 • 2162 Posts
Not implementing background/mental checks is what makes the US a dangerous place. NRA needs to initiate a background check for all applicants; other than that, nothing else. Piece of shit liberals are speaking through their assholes.Ackad
Except it's the piece of shit liberals who are advocating for the background checks.
Avatar image for Makhaidos
Makhaidos

2162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Makhaidos
Member since 2013 • 2162 Posts
[QUOTE="Makhaidos"][QUOTE="Ackad"]Not implementing background/mental checks is what makes the US a dangerous place. NRA needs to initiate a background check for all applicants; other than that, nothing else. Piece of shit liberals are speaking through their assholes.Ackad
Except it's the piece of shit liberals who are advocating for the background checks.

Even moderates? ;)

I'm sure moderate conservatives want background checks too. All six of them.
Avatar image for SwagSurf
SwagSurf

3022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 SwagSurf
Member since 2009 • 3022 Posts
[QUOTE="Ackad"]Not implementing background/mental checks is what makes the US a dangerous place. NRA needs to initiate a background check for all applicants; other than that, nothing else. Piece of shit liberals are speaking through their assholes.Makhaidos
Except it's the piece of shit liberals who are advocating for the background checks.

Seriously believe that the believe is made only by Liberals? :?
Avatar image for Makhaidos
Makhaidos

2162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Makhaidos
Member since 2013 • 2162 Posts
[QUOTE="Ackad"][QUOTE="Makhaidos"][QUOTE="Ackad"] Even moderates? ;)

I'm sure moderate conservatives want background checks too. All six of them.

You really believe there's not many moderate conservatives? :? You're tweaking

There are fewer and fewer every election cycle. In America, what constitutes "conservative" has been moving farther and farther to the right for the past three generations. Moderate conservatives are dismissed by their fellow conservatives as liberals and rejected by liberals for identifying as conservatives, so no, I don't think there are very many moderate conservatives. Pile that on with the fact that all but maybe three self-identified conservative politicians are teabagging blowhards and that conservative talk radio consists almost entirely of Chrsto-fascist racists, sexists and homophobes and my outlook isn't exactly improved.
Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts

Not implementing background/mental checks is what makes the US a dangerous place. NRA needs to initiate a background check for all applicants; other than that, nothing else. Piece of shit liberals are speaking through their assholes.Ackad

What the frack? We have background checks, and even then, it's not easy to determine who has a mental illness and who doesn't.

Our gun crime rate is going down, not up and these shootings are random, it's almost impossible to predict them.

Avatar image for ScottMescudi
ScottMescudi

1550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 ScottMescudi
Member since 2011 • 1550 Posts
[QUOTE="Makhaidos"][QUOTE="Ackad"][QUOTE="Makhaidos"] I'm sure moderate conservatives want background checks too. All six of them.

You really believe there's not many moderate conservatives? :? You're tweaking

There are fewer and fewer every election cycle. In America, what constitutes "conservative" has been moving farther and farther to the right for the past three generations. Moderate conservatives are dismissed by their fellow conservatives as liberals and rejected by liberals for identifying as conservatives, so no, I don't think there are very many moderate conservatives. Pile that on with the fact that all but maybe three self-identified conservative politicians are teabagging blowhards and that conservative talk radio consists almost entirely of Chrsto-fascist racists, sexists and homophobes and my outlook isn't exactly improved.

Regardless, staying between the lines and having some conservative agreements still makes you a moderate conservative. Conservatives usually like to point fingers as well. There are many moderate conservatives, but people can't differentiate between the different statuses; others will immediately label them as liberals though.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#13 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

Gun ownership isn't the issue. Full background checks and increase awareness and treatment of mental illness will do more to prevent these crimes. Look at home many people could have raised a red flag for the Navy Yard shooter.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts
Reading the abstract and conclusion it seems pretty obvious, "significant positive correlation between guns per capita per country and the rate of firearm related deaths." Not astonishing to see that countries with more guns are going to have more murders that involve them.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#17 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Kind of a poorly written article that has a clear spin that is against gun ownership. The study was specifically looking at gun related deaths, not overall homicide rates. Of course the USA has higher gun related deaths. Place with the most guns will have the most gun homocides and the most gun releated deaths. That's just pure logic.

More guns meant more deaths, they found. "The gun ownership rate was a strong and independent predictor of firearm-related death," says Bangalore. "Private gun ownership was highest in the US. Japan, on the other end, had an extremely low gun ownership rate. Similarly, South Africa (9.4 per 100,000) and the US (10.2 per 100,000) had extremely high firearm-related deaths, whereas the United Kingdom (0.25 per 100,000) had an extremely low rate of firearm-related deaths.

The Guardian

Didn't need a study to prove common sense. 

Overall the homocide rate in the US is overall higher than most of the developed world but gun related fatalities have been falling steadly since 1993. All homocides have actually been falling since then. Generally the higher murder rates in this nation can be tied with high amounts of gang violence and drug crime related violence. It's really more evidence that our war on drugs has only hurt this country.

So while violent crimes have been decreasing the amount of media coverage over these incidents has greatly increased and has made it seem like these make up the majority of gun crime. More people are slaughtered in Chicago on a weekend by guns than in the last two mass shooting combined. Clearly there are more issues here in the USA.

There is also no evidence to show that increased background checks is going to lower gun crime. At least none I've ever read or seen. If there is some I would love to see it. From what I've seen background checks and bans on certain weapons hasn't helped Chicago much.

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#18 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12388 Posts

Link: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/08/27/Harvard-Study-Shows-No-Correlation-Between-Strict-Gun-Control-And-Less-Crime-Violence

Study: http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf

 

Eastern European nations essentially prove that high gun ownership rates do not make a country less safe. The real issue surrounding firearms in the US is mental health of the population and the overall awareness of firearms. The 2nd Amendment of the United States involves firearms yet we seem to shy aware from speaking about it. The public should be more well informed about firearms and not less. 

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#19 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Link: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/08/27/Harvard-Study-Shows-No-Correlation-Between-Strict-Gun-Control-And-Less-Crime-Violence

Study: http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf

 

Eastern European nations essentially prove that high gun ownership rates do not make a country less safe. The real issue surrounding firearms in the US is mental health of the population and the overall awareness of firearms. The 2nd Amendment of the United States involves firearms yet we seem to shy aware from speaking about it. The public should be more well informed about firearms and not less. 

Nonstop-Madness

Often what I see is the people who are totally oblivious and uneducated about firearms are at the forefront of the gun-control debate. 

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts
I don't need a study to tell me that high gun ownership does not translate to lower crime rate. In fact its common sense that the opposite holds: higher rate of gun ownership leads to higher rate of violent crimes.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
Switzerland says otherwise....LJS9502_basic
This.
Avatar image for thebest31406
thebest31406

3775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 thebest31406
Member since 2004 • 3775 Posts

Kind of a poorly written article that has a clear spin that is against gun ownership. The study was specifically looking at gun related deaths, not overall homicide rates. Of course the USA has higher gun related deaths. Place with the most guns will have the most gun homocides and the most gun releated deaths. That's just pure logic.

[quote="The Guardian"]

More guns meant more deaths, they found. "The gun ownership rate was a strong and independent predictor of firearm-related death," says Bangalore. "Private gun ownership was highest in the US. Japan, on the other end, had an extremely low gun ownership rate. Similarly, South Africa (9.4 per 100,000) and the US (10.2 per 100,000) had extremely high firearm-related deaths, whereas the United Kingdom (0.25 per 100,000) had an extremely low rate of firearm-related deaths.

Wasdie

Didn't need a study to prove common sense. 

Overall the homocide rate in the US is overall higher than most of the developed world but gun related fatalities have been falling steadly since 1993. All homocides have actually been falling since then. Generally the higher murder rates in this nation can be tied with high amounts of gang violence and drug crime related violence. It's really more evidence that our war on drugs has only hurt this country.

So while violent crimes have been decreasing the amount of media coverage over these incidents has greatly increased and has made it seem like these make up the majority of gun crime. More people are slaughtered in Chicago on a weekend by guns than in the last two mass shooting combined. Clearly there are more issues here in the USA.

There is also no evidence to show that increased background checks is going to lower gun crime. At least none I've ever read or seen. If there is some I would love to see it. From what I've seen background checks and bans on certain weapons hasn't helped Chicago much.

With regard to the bans in Chicago, these measures are entirely superficial. Yes, there is a ban on paper but there are no meaningful ways to enforce it. You cannot simply have a ban in one city only to have sanctioned firearms in the surounding cities where the firearms can be purchased. And there's no customs line between Chicago and the rest of Illinois.
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

>Controls for no variables.

Probably written by some undergrad.

Avatar image for rastotm
rastotm

1380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 rastotm
Member since 2011 • 1380 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Switzerland says otherwise....Nibroc420
This.

Excellent argument. The gun politics in Switzerland are definitely similar to the gun politics in the US.

Avatar image for Amvis
Amvis

510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#25 Amvis
Member since 2007 • 510 Posts

How far are people really willing to go on this Crusade for Safety? Seriously...

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

Civilian gun ownership per capita.

a

Homocides per capita

a

Yep no correlation at all :roll:

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts
Uhm. South Africa is not a developed country.
Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
Four pages. Really?
Avatar image for Amvis
Amvis

510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#29 Amvis
Member since 2007 • 510 Posts

Judging by that chart, the Danes need to reel those Greenlanders in and teach them some order. Holy crap.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

44689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#30 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 44689 Posts
it would be pretty stupid to deny that gun prevalence has some factor in the degree of gun violence a nation faces, but there are other factors at play, crime rates and mental health statistics didn't prove too much of a factor in determining the rates of death, but I don't think the existence of guns is wholeheartedly the reasons, there's probably many social and economic factors that play a huge part in this there was an article a while back about a town and it that claimed the high ownership of guns was being argued as the reason for the town's low crime rate, though when you look into the town itself one finds that most people there made quite a bit of money, I imagine poverty is a very big factor in crime (though of course doesn't account for it all) as people lack economic mobility or even the essentials to provide a certain standard of living, so they resort to a life of crime I also figure wealth disparity plays a big role as well when it comes to crime attributed to poverty, I think wealth disparity probably makes people think there's a standard of living they're entitled to, and in that sense can lead people to resorting to crime when they feel their disparity is an injustice or undeserving... I kind of remember a documentary about North Korea where one person explained why it was nobody was upset about their impoverished conditions and the answer to that was that everybody was poor, didn't matter what they did for a living they were all equally poor and thus felt no resentment toward others in their social roles
Avatar image for thebest31406
thebest31406

3775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 thebest31406
Member since 2004 • 3775 Posts

Civilian gun ownership per capita.

a

Homocides per capita

a

Yep no correlation at all :roll:

themajormayor

Populations of the most economically depressed areas usually fall victim to most of world's homicides. I don't think permits will change that reality.

Avatar image for thebest31406
thebest31406

3775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 thebest31406
Member since 2004 • 3775 Posts
Uhm. South Africa is not a developed country.themajormayor
I didn't think so. The CIA suggest otherwise https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/appendix/appendix-b.html
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#33 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
You cray cray. Guns are the answer to life's major problems, such as gun crime.
Avatar image for thebest31406
thebest31406

3775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 thebest31406
Member since 2004 • 3775 Posts
Four pages. Really?CptJSparrow
Yeah, you're right.
Avatar image for DJ419
DJ419

1016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 DJ419
Member since 2005 • 1016 Posts

Oh look, another study that fails to link gun ownership to the causality of crimes while presenting it as if it does. The next study is going to link higher rates of car ownership with more vehicle deaths I bet!

 

brady-campaign-rape-lasts-30-seconds.jpg

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#36 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20510 Posts

Oh look, another study that fails to link gun ownership to the causality of crimes while presenting it as if it does. The next study is going to link higher rates of car ownership with more vehicle deaths I bet!

 

brady-campaign-rape-lasts-30-seconds.jpg

DJ419
Oh man, that banner is awful lol.
Avatar image for Flubbbs
Flubbbs

4968

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Flubbbs
Member since 2010 • 4968 Posts

nope

Avatar image for gamerguru100
gamerguru100

12718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 gamerguru100
Member since 2009 • 12718 Posts

Switzerland says hi. 

Avatar image for Barbariser
Barbariser

6785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#39 Barbariser
Member since 2009 • 6785 Posts

The study only seems to focus on firearm deaths (duh more guns are going to lead to more gun deaths). The correlation coefficient for guns vs overall crime rate is 0.33 and is therefore statistically insignificant, but I wonder what its value is for the overall homicide rate.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

It's not a shame to have any of you folk armed.

"Guns are criminal. If you touch one you have committed a crime. Only government is responsible to use them."

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#41 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

It's not a shame to have any of you folk armed.

"Guns are criminal. If you touch one you have committed a crime. Only government is responsible to use them."

LOXO7
I think it's a shame that people think guns are necessary. What a crappy state of affairs that is if true.
Avatar image for Capitan_Kid
Capitan_Kid

6700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Capitan_Kid
Member since 2009 • 6700 Posts
Makes perfect sense. More guns= more death. Its just that simple
Avatar image for DJ419
DJ419

1016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 DJ419
Member since 2005 • 1016 Posts

[QUOTE="LOXO7"]

It's not a shame to have any of you folk armed.

"Guns are criminal. If you touch one you have committed a crime. Only government is responsible to use them."

SolidSnake35

I think it's a shame that people think guns are necessary.

It isn't necessary for you to be posting on a gaming forum right now, yet here you are.

Avatar image for deactivated-598fc45371265
deactivated-598fc45371265

13247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#44 deactivated-598fc45371265
Member since 2008 • 13247 Posts

Makes perfect sense. More guns= more death. Its just that simpleCapitan_Kid

sigh, just look at themajormayor's post.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
[QUOTE="LOXO7"]

It's not a shame to have any of you folk armed.

"Guns are criminal. If you touch one you have committed a crime. Only government is responsible to use them."

SolidSnake35
I think it's a shame that people think guns are necessary. What a crappy state of affairs that is if true.

It's defensive, like wearing clothes, locking doors, and brushing teeth. I wish for paradise, but for now, I'll wear a coat when it's cold outside.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
Makes perfect sense. More guns= more death. Its just that simpleCapitan_Kid
Yet when guns were made harder to get in the UK, knife crimes skyrocketed.
Avatar image for SwagSurf
SwagSurf

3022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 SwagSurf
Member since 2009 • 3022 Posts

Wouldn't you know, the nanny state has the highest crime rate in America (at least of 2012)..

http://www.nbcchicago.com/blogs/ward-room/chicago-fbi-homicide-report-224396461.html

Ackad
Liberals should suck on a fat shlong
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

Civilian gun ownership per capita.

a

Homocides per capita

a

Yep no correlation at all :roll:

thebest31406

Populations of the most economically depressed areas usually fall victim to most of world's homicides. I don't think permits will change that reality.

That's why I said correlation and not causation.