paperwarior17's comments

Avatar image for paperwarior17
paperwarior17

479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

At least they brought the price down, which, incidentally, is something they have yet to do for the original.

Avatar image for paperwarior17
paperwarior17

479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

You want to talk demoralizing online experiences, Smash Ultimate matchmaking is that. That aside, it's true that you can't wave a wand and implement good rollback, but I think every single Smash Bros player would rather have reliable online multiplayer than what we have now.

Avatar image for paperwarior17
paperwarior17

479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'm not sure how many real-life situations call for "Omae wa mou shindeiru"

Avatar image for paperwarior17
paperwarior17

479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

No way he pulled that off already without downloading the leaked version.

Avatar image for paperwarior17
paperwarior17

479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

My GM has been using a program called Dungeon Alchemist to create detailed interiors and then convert them to overhead maps for use in Roll20.

Avatar image for paperwarior17
paperwarior17

479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I never finished Saints Row 2 even though I love it. But now it's stranded on PS3 or in a far-from-ideal PC version.

Avatar image for paperwarior17
paperwarior17

479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for paperwarior17
paperwarior17

479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

That HDR issue was the first thing I encountered when starting the game. I briefly considered whether it was an odd stylistic choice until it became clear that I really couldn't tell what was being shown on-screen at all.

Avatar image for paperwarior17
paperwarior17

479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By paperwarior17

@tchonn said:

Exp Share didn't start as "an actual item that you could give to an individual Pokemon", since the feature of giving items to Pokémon for them to hold was introduced only in the second generation games.

The Exp Share feature actually started as soon as the 1st generation. It was indeed an actual item, which, as long as players had it in their inventory, would redistribute Exp to all 6 Pokémon in the team. In a way, it was closer to how the system looks like today. Except that, back then, the amount of Exp shared was incredibly low, rendering the object close to useless.

Well, I had to look this one up because I simply didn't remember it. The Exp.All was indeed a passive inventory item. It did give 50% EXP (and stat EXP) to every non-participating party member but like most things in gen 1, it was glitched somehow to decrease the effect depending on participating and fainted members.

Avatar image for paperwarior17
paperwarior17

479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rolento25: If they received the game early then they didn't need to delete their account, true.