mortalhuman's forum posts

  • 33 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Avatar image for mortalhuman
mortalhuman

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 mortalhuman
Member since 2011 • 31 Posts
Read the opening post?! I never claim that the videos are not from PS3. I use the PS3 videos to PROVE the top most screenshot cannot be current console and must be PC or nexgen console, because the top image on page 1 has "night shadows" - a pc only feature. People try to say "maybe v has them now" - fair enough, but then where ARE they in the images below the top one? The purple car image on page 1 = pc screenshot, and it is a promotional shot. The images below it, with the writing on them are from the PS3 video. They do NOT have shadows from the headlights or street lamps - but the top screen does. PC confirmed :D
Avatar image for mortalhuman
mortalhuman

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 mortalhuman
Member since 2011 • 31 Posts

[QUOTE="Sweenix"]

No

http://www.playstationlifestyle.net/2013/08/15/grand-theft-auto-online-trailer-was-demoed-on-ps3-it-would-be-hard-to-tell-the-ps3-xbox-360-versions-apart/

The online gameplay trailer was demoed on ps3

http://au.gamespot.com/news/gtav-gameplay-trailer-captured-on-ps3-6411234

and the official trailer was also demoed on ps3

nice try

R3FURBISHED

How is this thread still going on?

because the denial artist you quoted got it completely backwards and is wrong. And because the thread is true. Regardless of console players' ignorance, the screenshots are, like any other game, from a PC build where it is developed.
Avatar image for mortalhuman
mortalhuman

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 mortalhuman
Member since 2011 • 31 Posts
quoted down for ragnarok: [QUOTE="brian"]Finally took the time to grab examples from IV marketing, console version, and PC version: IV console shots directly captured from the game running on xbox 360:  and like this:  [color=yellow]Promo shots[/color]:  another with more view distance to see, take special notice how crisp this is, downscaled and that introduced its own jaggies by eliminating/mashing up small details, but this is a promo shot, that people complained the final game wasn't like ,and called a bullshot after release, but this is how the game looks on PC, after downscaling a screenshot:  [color=yellow]Actual PC screenshots, downscaled to 720p[/color]: (actually, 1280x800, since it's a 16:10 screen, more view area than 16:9)   SOME would argue these look BETTER than all the other shots - so I would say people should pray that I am right, because if the IV screenshots are any indication, V on PC is going to look even better than those screenshots. And PLEASE take careful notice that downscaling the image did not magically deform and smooth out Niko's collar. Franklin is tessellated in that other image, along with the cop car, other characers, and the bike aside from its spoked wheels :^: Sweet huh? Puts my claims in better perspective perhaps? (I still haven't done my max payne 3 comparisons between promo shots -> console captures -> and pc version maxed out and downscaled to console size - anyone excited for that? I'll be doing it soon!) Ever since IV, rage has come a long way. All the features I can see in the V screenshots are present in max payne 3.

Avatar image for mortalhuman
mortalhuman

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 mortalhuman
Member since 2011 • 31 Posts

Alot of compaies have used pc versions to promote there games in trailer and screenshots wouldn't suprise me if this was the case.

DJ_Headshot
Indeed they ALL do. Console players just assume, falsely, that they magically photoshop DX11 shaders into these images. They are morons because even in the face of ample evidence, they still don't believe it. I was once like that. But then I actually PLAYED on PC for a while instead of just talk about it as if my piece of crap console was worth anything special. Then I started realizing that "bullshots" were actually the pC version, every **** time. Either a dev shows the real game, OR they show pc shots. Forward renderer games tends to show the real game still these days. They can easily AA and render very nice forward images. Deferred games like GTA, these tend to be downscaled, because screenshots really don't do the "actual TV outputted image" justice. HEAR THAT CONSOLE PROFESSIONALS?! THATS RIGHT: YOUR GAMES LOOK BETTER ON THE TV SCREEN THAN THEIR DIRECT CAPTURES DO. ESPECIALLY ON TUBE TV's. But they never look as good as those directx11 screenshots, and GTA V ain't got dynamic night shadows on the console, only moon shadows. And it is proven in the opening post, because the top screen is pc with night shadows (see direction of light pole and car shadow - shadow is coming from light pole - PC only, and you could doubt it, EXCEPT the images under it prove clearly console does not have this feature but IV had it on PC and so will V)
Avatar image for mortalhuman
mortalhuman

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 mortalhuman
Member since 2011 • 31 Posts

[QUOTE="parkurtommo"][QUOTE="sts106mat"]How sad is this shit?R4gn4r0k

Sad that people actually believe the console versions will look as good as those screenshots? Yeah that is pretty damn sad. I'm glad people like "Brian" here are providing their insight, that is quite NOT SAD.

Whatever the case is. This "Brian" at least backs up his statement with arguments. How hard is that to come by here on SW... someone actually backing up his statement with any arugments.

All I see here is just "lol PC gamers still sad". Without any counter argument given whatsoever.

Personally I don't believe those are PC screenshots, they are just touched up. Like the touched up screenshots that were released before GTA IV was out.

Those GTA IV screenshots were pc shots too at different stages of development (i have posted IV console, promo, and pc shots in earlier pages of this thread). You need to understand: what console players call "bullshots" and "touch ups", PC players call "the actual game I play". It's true for IV, it's true for Max Payne 3, and it will be true for GTA V.
Avatar image for mortalhuman
mortalhuman

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 mortalhuman
Member since 2011 • 31 Posts
yea, especially when the image is more about what console players want, and PC players like myself telling them why it cannot be. No DX11 on the consoles. Not enough memory for high detail textures and high quality shaders. etc. The jokes on the noob that made the played out image, because it's basically the story of console players who can't get the shit they want in those screenshots, and it has been very varefully explained why.
Avatar image for mortalhuman
mortalhuman

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 mortalhuman
Member since 2011 • 31 Posts
At the end of the day, the OP is true. Period. And half the people here completely misunderstood it or didn't even read it, because the morons are talking about it reverse than what it actually means.
Avatar image for mortalhuman
mortalhuman

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 mortalhuman
Member since 2011 • 31 Posts
[quote=brian.]Finally took the time to grab examples from IV marketing, console version, and PC version: IV console shots directly captured from the game running on xbox 360:  and like this:  [color=yellow]Promo shots[/color]:  another with more view distance to see, take special notice how crisp this is, downscaled and that introduced its own jaggies by eliminating/mashing up small details, but this is a promo shot, that people complained the final game wasn't like ,and called a bullshot after release, but this is how the game looks on PC, after downscaling a screenshot:  [color=yellow]Actual PC screenshots, downscaled to 720p[/color]: (actually, 1280x800, since it's a 16:10 screen, more view area than 16:9)   SOME would argue these look BETTER than all the other shots - so I would say people should pray that I am right, because if the IV screenshots are any indication, V on PC is going to look even better than those screenshots. And PLEASE take careful notice that downscaling the image did not magically deform and smooth out Niko's collar. Franklin is tessellated in that other image, along with the cop car, other characers, and the bike aside from its spoked wheels :^: Sweet huh? Puts my claims in better perspective perhaps? (I still haven't done my max payne 3 comparisons between promo shots -> console captures -> and pc version maxed out and downscaled to console size - anyone excited for that? I'll be doing it soon!) Ever since IV, rage has come a long way. All the features I can see in the V screenshots are present in max payne 3.

Avatar image for mortalhuman
mortalhuman

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 mortalhuman
Member since 2011 • 31 Posts
[QUOTE="sts106mat"][QUOTE="AMD655"][QUOTE="sts106mat"] you must have been born in the previous decade.

I am 23, what does age have to do with this? Is this now your DC again? Throughout this thread you have managed to do nothing but talk rubbish, anything and everything to put console in a better light. Your opinion is an opinion, not a fact.

are you for real? you are the one who was spamming pics of aliens, which has nothing to do with GTA. you are the one who cannot accept, that in my opinion, i'd much rather have the console version of the game than wait up to a year or more for slightly better graphics, but essentially the exact same game. I have not once spoken rubbish or tried to do "anything and everything to put console in a better light" I am well aware that opinions are not facts. you should go back through the thread and read your own responses. you come across as a bit of a dickhead to be honest.

NOOB it will NOT be slight. PROMISE> FACT.
Avatar image for mortalhuman
mortalhuman

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 mortalhuman
Member since 2011 • 31 Posts

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

 

nope it looks fooking amazing on 1080p 3DTV

nihonking

 

Give it up man you and I both know that game does not look that great. Thats fine tho the next gen consoles will provide graphics that will help blur the line between pc and themselves. If 1080p becomes a standard next gen my rigs will be getting a major rest lol. I hope that sony and microsoft pull thru with this.

Nice of you to be nice to the consoles, but they will date just like these ones did, right? :P Like, those consoles will be "nexgen" until the next generation of cards :P PS3 gpu is now 7 generations behind. Sure, the consoles will blur the gap - but for only about a year, then it's back to PC being the true gaming platform, and the console being the casual, more expensive solution. :P People who think console gaming is cheaper than PC, don't even try it: My multiplayer is free. I have PS+ and Live for life, for free. I get my games at 75% off and 90% off, I get sales on release days half the time - you add up all your costs over 5 years, and add up mine, I've got you beat by double, easily. You can build a PS4-equal PC for 500 bucks. You can upgrade that and stick with the times. Or you can spend more and not upgrade for a while over time. The console is going to be old fast though. 7 generations of GPU. First post of this thread shows the MASSIVE difference between PC and Consoles, and so do the other examples here. 720p is unacceptable to me in 2013, especially for GTA.
  • 33 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4