mortalhuman's forum posts
[QUOTE="mortalhuman"]I am not really asking for people to consider the possibility - I wrote that post in that way because I KNEW I would have to let people come to the conclusion on their own. Straight up telling them "this is the fact" would not end well (even that thread did not end well!). But it is the fact man. No, the screenshots are NOT from the gameplay, the screenshots are LEAPS AND BOUNDS higher fidelity than those consoles. Here is a comparrison between screenshot and gameplay (aka pc and console - FACT) here is the screenshot:
and HERE is a console image of the same place, and it is downscaled so it should be even more crisp... but it's not: WHERE DID THE TREES GO? On PC, we call this "view distance" and "detail distance" - and my source told me "foliage density"
YOU GONNA LEARN TODAY. YOU WERE SAFE IN BLISSFUL IGNORANCE UNTIL I WAS NOTIFIED OF THIS FORUM. MY PROFESSIONAL EXPERTISE WILL BE ENOUGH TO CURB YOUR DISGUST IN MY UNPROFESSIONAL ASS WHOOPING.menes777
What if they were just bullshots that were doctored up for promotional purposes?
how the frigg do you suppose they would just doctor up some images?! everything in both of those images is rendered in RAGE. Do you own GTA IV on PC? Or just console? If you own it on PC, you should recognize high pc settings vs normal console settings very easily, even under a different asset set and some improvements. Not all shots are dx11, not all shot are MSAA'd - there are multiple people taking these screenshots, some of them even use different brightness contrast settings then their colleagues - but these screenshots are coming off of rockstar north's rigs, not off their dev kits. They simply cannot populate that scene (very technical, skip it), and look at the trains. And the size of textures - one is "medium" if this was GTA IV, and the other is "Very High" Promise. and HERE is a console image of the same place, and it is downscaled so it should be even more crisp... but it's not: WHERE DID THE TREES GO? On PC, we call this "view distance" and "detail distance" - and my source told me "foliage density" YOU GONNA LEARN TODAY. YOU WERE SAFE IN BLISSFUL IGNORANCE UNTIL I WAS NOTIFIED OF THIS FORUM. MY PROFESSIONAL EXPERTISE WILL BE ENOUGH TO CURB YOUR DISGUST IN MY UNPROFESSIONAL ASS WHOOPING.
[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]It's more likely the GTA V screens are bullshots rather than actual screens taken from a real-time PC version faizan_faizanI agree with this guy. EVERY game you can name that has "bullshots", those "bullshots" ARE THE GAME I PLAY. PERIOD. You know nothing, even when it is very carefully explained. It's hilarious. And the funniest part is that any serious gamer ALWAYS ends up on PC anyway. If you don't, you were just a casual anyway - which is okay - but don't pretend you know what you're talking about, you're repeating the assumptions of morons who are inexperienced.
Same car in GTA IV, on PC, no tessellation, same density as the GTA V green ruiner in the first image, you can see the edges on the wheelwell. On the car in the first shot, it is way subdivided to make it smoother, and the screenshot is rage engine, not a render: 
Log in to comment