@Dirty_Window According to your response, we are on the same page here. We both agree that DLC can be a complete and utter ripoff, and I would never spend money on something so trivial. But you have now agreed with me by saying that there is good DLC out there. I know that it is used a lot to rip off customers and drain money from their customers, hell online passes are the worst thing that has ever come to gaming. But I don't know about you, I have had more fun with DLC like The Ballad of Gay Tony than I did with GTA IV on it's own. So what it comes down to, is only pay for what you should get, if something should be free, don't pay for it, but if something worth 15.00$ is being sold for 15.00$ I fail to see the issue.

@Dirty_Window So tell me then, why is getting more things to do in a game a bad thing? I can understand DLC that hardly does a damn thing (like a lot of the things in Saints Row the Third) but didn't you ever play the GTA IV DLC? It added whole new stories, new features, more multiplayer options, etc. Please do tell me how all DLC is horrid and should not be purchased, because if anything we should support good DLC and not support the sort of s&*t that Capcom does with content locked on the disc. If it's legitimate DLC, that isn't just some color pallet swap for 5.00$ than support it so that you can support the developer.

P.S. No one is MAKING YOU but it, so quit complaining.

@emperiox Red Dead had DLC that cost money too, and this game already has a free DLC. I wouldn't worry to much about it.

@picho86 So what you are saying is that you don't want more things for games you like? That's like saying that you hate games in general. The only DLC I hate is the kind that Capcom is giving us, because that we should already have. Proper DLC should be made after the games has been released for at least a month, no sooner or there is no excuse for it not to be included with the retail copy.