The main character is refreshingly new, and the adventure while at places a bit simple - is by no means as bad as you make it out to be.
A score of 5...what not enough explosions and fast framerate?
Sorry for the sarcasm, but it seems the reviewer either forgot or never liked how adventure games used to be ( I refer to older games because this genre especially often finds people pointing back at its golden age 1 or 2 decades back).
I do see the reviewer defend herself below with a list of many good classics. But I fail to believe the same reviewer would give them a high score, based on the "flaws" pointed out here.
My personal score for this: 7.5 - it's not amongst the best, but definitely not a horrible adventure either. Fans of the genre will find the good outweigh the bad and then some.
It's a sad trend that GS reviews low budget games badly.
Sure they'll defend themselves as below with lists of games they "love", yet they can't deny they slaughter the new games the resembles those old ones the most.
lostcause78's comments