@Legend_of_Link: i think what you would want more is a demo. gameplay wise you have probably seen all there is too see. dodge system. wepon system class change system. took at look at some skills saw the menus. saw the caracters. saw the dialog system. saw the enviroment and a glimpse of the story.
saw exploration and jet packs. saw armor custumization.
@jdc6305: i can respect that . but honestly people were over reacting over the ending. its not that good yeah but its nothing to rage about that bad. specialy because SPOILERS.
@Nakaruga: DAI MP was just bad.... the end. DAI fighting style does not translate very well to MP because DA has tactics incorporated into their style. and in MP you canot take advantage of it due to the really simplistic skill trees. armor jobs and wepons were hard to get. so a new player would really strugle with the game. in a level full of monsters with limited healing.....and then a stupidly strong boss apears that just wipes the team
@Legend_of_Link: hype has been a bad thing latly. the hype = MS or sony paying webpages for constant advertisment making it look beter then it is. no mans sky was that. people complain about the game but if they used their head for a second they would think a couple of things for the game sucking.
1- its a indie game meaning limited resources lower then your avarage game.
2- the world was huge.... stupidly huge.....so ofc it would have impacts in the quality of the worlds... its obvious.
3- a indie game being the price of a triple A game
but no...... they fell for the hype train of websites saying how amazing it was.
@jdc6305: this is true for many games. but not mass effect. ME3 multiplayer was great and only got beter for it. i would buy the game just for multiplayer
@ndmallmann: anyway you cant compare a movie to a game. for one the price is a big diference. and everyone can just watch it at home. not the same with games. if games were 10 bucks on release.... you can bet it would be much higher
leonA0's comments